• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was revolution in Russia considered by many to be inevitable in the years before World War One?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was revolution in Russia considered by many to be inevitable in the years before World War One? Russia's disastrous and humiliating defeat during World War One is widely seen as the final factor contributing to the explosive revolutions of 1917. Their ill-equipped and badly run armies stood no chance against the smaller yet highly organised German troops. The situation continued to deteriorate as soldiers incessantly charged to their deaths in the battle fields, and thousands starved in the cities and countryside. Although the failure of the war effort certainly provided the spark Lenin and others needed to finally seize power, many claim that revolution was inevitable even in the years leading up to 1914. By 1917 Russia had been run by the same dynasty, the Rominovs, for 304 years. The ruler of Russia, the Tsar, ruled by divine right and imposed an autocracy, a repressive system under which 95% of the population was effectively ignored and abused. The Tsar thus retained complete power and authority over all areas of life, including the Orthodox Church. ...read more.

Middle

Having been recently freed from slavery, these peasants lived in the utmost poverty owning small patches of land, (usually unworkable during the winter due to frost) and large debts. They were, for the most part illiterate which made it hard, if not impossible, for them to modernise their techniques. There was a rising discontent among these peasants, they began to long for a reform of the system as their love of the land was marred by stories of the relatively wealthy peasants of Western Europe. Russia's alliance with France in ?????? brought a sudden industrialisation preparing this huge country for the possibility of war. Huge industries and cheaply erected accommodation were built up almost over night as the Tsar anticipated the vast influx of workers into the cities. By the turn of the century, almost 20% of the population consisted of factory workers. Having migrated to the city under illusions of what the future would bring them, they laboured all day, every day, for horrifically low wages and little to no rights. ...read more.

Conclusion

By 1900 therefore, Russia was not only behind in industry and agriculture compared to her allies, but also in her autocratic political system. Britain and France had both had their revolutions, having made the transition from absolutism to democracy over 100 years earlier. Russia, however, had yet to undergo this transition which many believed was essential for one's development. A second revolution seemed to be sweeping through Europe, not quite finding a country to settle in, a revolution based on an ideology, that of collectivism. Many determined revolutionists had arisen as a result of Europe's industrialisation which seemed to have been accompanied by the establishment of a new system based on exploitation and wealth, a system which came to be called capitalism. Socialist parties became popular in Europe and then in Russia. The Marxist ideology, based on the principle of total equality and aiming for the abolition of hierarchy within a society, seemed to have a strong hold in Russia where exploitation and inequality were taken to a new extreme. With the rising mistrust of the Tsar, support for these revolutionaries soared as people began to predict a collapse of the archaic regime, or at least a reformation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source C is a prime example of this, as it shows Stalin being polite to the wives of the red army and reaching down to them which shows that he was very positive towards the army. This will give a very good impression of Stalin, however, in actual fact Stalin

  2. Why Was Russia Considered Backward in the Early 19th Century?

    Russia did not recognise the importance of educating its entire people as those in control were rich and comfortable. The social boundaries were also much stronger than most other countries, there were the rich and poor and they did not mix.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    sources have a similar ambiguity both sources portray that Stalin did use terror however one may say that Khrushchev criticized everything that Stalin did as part of his policy of destalinisation he introduced this After Stalin had died in March 1953 The new leadership declared an amnesty for some serving

  2. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    Their had been considerable support (around 80,000 picketers) for this movement lead by George Gapon who witness the massacre that ensued at the hands of the Tsar and wrote 'a new chapter was opened in the book of history of our people' which signalled the 1905 revolution.

  1. Tsar's Russia & revolution, Hitler's rise to power revison notes.

    --> Lost 34 seats (Nov.) --> Hitler offered Chancellor (Jan 1933) --> Election: 288 seats --> Richstag fire --> Declared communists illegal --> Passes Enabling Law --> Declares all parties illegal --> Night of Long Knives --> Death of Hindenburg --> Absolute Power.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    As late as 1940, two-thirds of the population lived in conditions of rural backwardness. Now, the entire position has been reversed. Two-thirds live in the cities and only one-third on the land, in other words, we have witnessed the same processes that we saw in the West over the last 50 years, i.e.

  1. Was the defeat in the war the real cause of the Russian Revolution

    This was around the time that he started to question whether Nicholas was able to uphold the autocracy while bringing Russia up to date with Eastern Europe, with countries like Britain and Germany. However because he achieved all of this he brought a threat to the tsar's authority and that of the autocracy so he was dismissed in April 1906.

  2. How far were things improving in Russia before the First World War?

    The middle-class were often well-educated and so could manage the Russian economy more successfully than it previously was. As the population of the middle class increased, so did economical wealth and capitalist influence in Russia. St. Petersburg was a particularly attractive capitalist venue and the amount of middle class in St.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work