• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent do I agree with the Thesis? The Allied victors following the end of World War I had a job to set the peace terms for the defeated Central Powers following the armistices of 1918. The main countries and leaders involved were France- Clemenceau, Britain- Lloyd George and America- Wilson: the big three. They held Paris peace conferences were they deliberated and discussed their own ideas and views about what should be done; now the war was over. However, all three men were very opinionated and tended not to agree on many things, which concludes why it took a little over five months for the treaty of Versailles to be formed. The thesis formulated here advocates that even though Wilson?s conception was considered idealistic, it was the best approach for sustaining the post-war peace. An issue that Wilson was passionate about was self-determination; he believed that every country should be ruled by their own people. He strongly disagreed with empires and colonies, and believed that the people of the country should choose their leader. But, with the collapse of the Austrian empire it was possible that in the future Austria may look for support from Germany- join forces to become a union. ...read more.

Middle

So, after seeing so many young men not return from the trenches on the western front, Clemenceau and his people wanted revenge against the German through the peace settlement. He wanted to ensure that his country and its people would never be destroyed by German aggression again. Therefore, he demanded very high reparations- 200 billion gold francs- so Germany would never have the means to harm France again. Since, unlike in America and Britain, the German troops had managed to do a lot of damage to the French industry for example flooding coal mines, and destroying farm machinery. But, most importantly the war had obliterated the French economy, their economic state was very poor at the time and Clemenceau wanted to use the money he received in reparations, to get France back on its feet. However, Lloyd George was only following popular sentiment back in Britain when he fought for harsher terms than Wilson. He, himself was much more reserved on this issue and like Wilson did not want too much from Germany. He did not want the German industry to cripple, because he ultimately believed a weak Germany would damage the British economy as Germany was considered a very useful trading partner. ...read more.

Conclusion

the situation, if Germany wasn?t weakened dramatically in the first place, I highly there would be a purpose or reason for Germany to invade again. However, I do believe that the military should have been reduced- especially the army- as they had more than 2 million, which was more than any country, needs to defend themselves. Overall, I believe that Wilson and Clemenceau were both extreme. Their views were very much either side of the scale whereas Lloyd George seemed to be sometimes in agreement with Wilson and other times with Clemenceau. So, in effect Wilson?s views were idealistic and I believe that Lloyd George had the common ground and was right for most of the issues. However, if the treaty of Versailles contained the proposals that Wilson wanted, I do believe that there may not have been a second world war. This is because the German people would have not felt suppressed and would not support the rise of a leader like Hitler. So, even though I think that Lloyd George had the best approach considering the circumstances, the German people would still be repressed immensely if his terms were agreed to. Therefore, in hindsight I do agree with the thesis that Wilson did have the best approach for the sake of long lasting peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This did happen. * All land taken from Russia had to be handed back to Russia. This did happen though land in the western area became Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in keeping with the belief in national self-determination. * Germany's army had to be reduced to 100,000 men.

  2. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    England's population was about one half as much as the United States. English government's wealth should be put at about to fifth as the United States. A debtor nation does not love its creditor. The existence of debts will crush the finance and the economy of a debtor.

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    "National aspirations must be respected; peoples may only be dominated and governed by their own consent."4 Wilson's main concern and aim was to set up an international body that could deal with any problems that a nation may have, thus disposing of secret treaties and conflict between nations.

  2. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    As a result, they wanted a harsh treaty. France wanted to ensure that no third attack would ever take place, and wanted Germany to be reduced to a minor European State. France was an Imperialist country, therefore it had vast expanses of empire around the world; as did England who opposed the idea of self determination too.

  1. "The treaty of Versailles represented neither a Wilson peace nor a Clemenceau peace, but ...

    Woodrow Wilson had joined the war for idealistic reasons on the part of his country: propaganda across America portrayed her role in the war as champion for democracy and the savior of Europe. Wilson had also formulated, prior to the German Armistice, a list of "14-Points", based on which the latter had been signed.

  2. The Antarctic Treaty: When and why was the treaty formed?

    Once a treaty is ratified, it means that all Australians are bound by law to observe and obey its provisions, terms and conditions. How successful has the treaty been in achieving its goals? As treaties go, the Antarctica Treaty has been an extremely successful one.

  1. The airline industry

    Ryanair, Hapag-Lloyd Express and EasyJet are just a few to mention, which spring up like mushrooms in Europe mostly and not to think of other places like Australia and USA (Air Tran). In Europe you can fly from Frankfurt to Stockholm for a round-trip fare of $35 including tax and

  2. Post War Peace -even though Wilsons conception was considered idealistic, it was the best ...

    Lloyd George was not too concerned regarding this issue, he, himself did not see the problem of the two countries combining. However, Lloyd George knew the people of Britain would not be keen on the two countries joining a union. In my opinion, Wilsonâs view would not restore lasting peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work