• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what extent do I agree with the Thesis? The Allied victors following the end of World War I had a job to set the peace terms for the defeated Central Powers following the armistices of 1918. The main countries and leaders involved were France- Clemenceau, Britain- Lloyd George and America- Wilson: the big three. They held Paris peace conferences were they deliberated and discussed their own ideas and views about what should be done; now the war was over. However, all three men were very opinionated and tended not to agree on many things, which concludes why it took a little over five months for the treaty of Versailles to be formed. The thesis formulated here advocates that even though Wilson?s conception was considered idealistic, it was the best approach for sustaining the post-war peace. An issue that Wilson was passionate about was self-determination; he believed that every country should be ruled by their own people. He strongly disagreed with empires and colonies, and believed that the people of the country should choose their leader. But, with the collapse of the Austrian empire it was possible that in the future Austria may look for support from Germany- join forces to become a union. ...read more.


So, after seeing so many young men not return from the trenches on the western front, Clemenceau and his people wanted revenge against the German through the peace settlement. He wanted to ensure that his country and its people would never be destroyed by German aggression again. Therefore, he demanded very high reparations- 200 billion gold francs- so Germany would never have the means to harm France again. Since, unlike in America and Britain, the German troops had managed to do a lot of damage to the French industry for example flooding coal mines, and destroying farm machinery. But, most importantly the war had obliterated the French economy, their economic state was very poor at the time and Clemenceau wanted to use the money he received in reparations, to get France back on its feet. However, Lloyd George was only following popular sentiment back in Britain when he fought for harsher terms than Wilson. He, himself was much more reserved on this issue and like Wilson did not want too much from Germany. He did not want the German industry to cripple, because he ultimately believed a weak Germany would damage the British economy as Germany was considered a very useful trading partner. ...read more.


the situation, if Germany wasn?t weakened dramatically in the first place, I highly there would be a purpose or reason for Germany to invade again. However, I do believe that the military should have been reduced- especially the army- as they had more than 2 million, which was more than any country, needs to defend themselves. Overall, I believe that Wilson and Clemenceau were both extreme. Their views were very much either side of the scale whereas Lloyd George seemed to be sometimes in agreement with Wilson and other times with Clemenceau. So, in effect Wilson?s views were idealistic and I believe that Lloyd George had the common ground and was right for most of the issues. However, if the treaty of Versailles contained the proposals that Wilson wanted, I do believe that there may not have been a second world war. This is because the German people would have not felt suppressed and would not support the rise of a leader like Hitler. So, even though I think that Lloyd George had the best approach considering the circumstances, the German people would still be repressed immensely if his terms were agreed to. Therefore, in hindsight I do agree with the thesis that Wilson did have the best approach for the sake of long lasting peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This did happen. * All land taken from Russia had to be handed back to Russia. This did happen though land in the western area became Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in keeping with the belief in national self-determination. * Germany's army had to be reduced to 100,000 men.

  2. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    as England gave to other Allies during the same period (excluding sums given by the United States before the war) so that almost the whole of England's debts to the United States was incurred to assist her Allies. 2. England gave about 5 billion dollars for foreign securities.

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    He desired to apply self determination and democracy to all people, and establish a just and permanent system of international relations. Also included in Wilson's Fourteen Points were the restoration of Belgium, return of Alsace-Lorraine to France, independent Poland with access to the sea, complete freedom on the seas except

  2. "The treaty of Versailles represented neither a Wilson peace nor a Clemenceau peace, but ...

    He wished for an extremely conciliatory peace, even one with no clear victors defined. In addition, he had no wishes to impose reparations on the German peoples, nor in any specific way, save the returning of Alsace-Lorraine and the 'mandate'-ation of German colonies, punish Germany for her involvement in the war.

  1. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    As a result, they wanted a harsh treaty. France wanted to ensure that no third attack would ever take place, and wanted Germany to be reduced to a minor European State. France was an Imperialist country, therefore it had vast expanses of empire around the world; as did England who opposed the idea of self determination too.

  2. The Allies punished Germany in the Treaty of Versailles because of the pressure exerted ...

    Also, the Rhineland became a demilitarised zone. This meant that no German troops were allowed into this area. B) The Allies punished Germany in the Treaty of Versailles because of the pressure exerted on Lloyd George, Clemenceau and Wilson by the civilians of the allied countries to deal severely with Germany.

  1. The Antarctic Treaty: When and why was the treaty formed?

    The success of the IGY was not lost on the diplomats and politicians of the nations involved with Antarctica. The United States had instigated negotiations for some sort of worldwide administration for the Antarctic, but they came up against numerous hurdles including Cold War politics and the territorial claims of seven countries, including Australia.

  2. Post War Peace -even though Wilsons conception was considered idealistic, it was the best ...

    Lloyd George was not too concerned regarding this issue, he, himself did not see the problem of the two countries combining. However, Lloyd George knew the people of Britain would not be keen on the two countries joining a union. In my opinion, Wilsonâs view would not restore lasting peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work