• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what extent do I agree with the Thesis? The Allied victors following the end of World War I had a job to set the peace terms for the defeated Central Powers following the armistices of 1918. The main countries and leaders involved were France- Clemenceau, Britain- Lloyd George and America- Wilson: the big three. They held Paris peace conferences were they deliberated and discussed their own ideas and views about what should be done; now the war was over. However, all three men were very opinionated and tended not to agree on many things, which concludes why it took a little over five months for the treaty of Versailles to be formed. The thesis formulated here advocates that even though Wilson?s conception was considered idealistic, it was the best approach for sustaining the post-war peace. An issue that Wilson was passionate about was self-determination; he believed that every country should be ruled by their own people. He strongly disagreed with empires and colonies, and believed that the people of the country should choose their leader. But, with the collapse of the Austrian empire it was possible that in the future Austria may look for support from Germany- join forces to become a union. ...read more.


So, after seeing so many young men not return from the trenches on the western front, Clemenceau and his people wanted revenge against the German through the peace settlement. He wanted to ensure that his country and its people would never be destroyed by German aggression again. Therefore, he demanded very high reparations- 200 billion gold francs- so Germany would never have the means to harm France again. Since, unlike in America and Britain, the German troops had managed to do a lot of damage to the French industry for example flooding coal mines, and destroying farm machinery. But, most importantly the war had obliterated the French economy, their economic state was very poor at the time and Clemenceau wanted to use the money he received in reparations, to get France back on its feet. However, Lloyd George was only following popular sentiment back in Britain when he fought for harsher terms than Wilson. He, himself was much more reserved on this issue and like Wilson did not want too much from Germany. He did not want the German industry to cripple, because he ultimately believed a weak Germany would damage the British economy as Germany was considered a very useful trading partner. ...read more.


the situation, if Germany wasn?t weakened dramatically in the first place, I highly there would be a purpose or reason for Germany to invade again. However, I do believe that the military should have been reduced- especially the army- as they had more than 2 million, which was more than any country, needs to defend themselves. Overall, I believe that Wilson and Clemenceau were both extreme. Their views were very much either side of the scale whereas Lloyd George seemed to be sometimes in agreement with Wilson and other times with Clemenceau. So, in effect Wilson?s views were idealistic and I believe that Lloyd George had the common ground and was right for most of the issues. However, if the treaty of Versailles contained the proposals that Wilson wanted, I do believe that there may not have been a second world war. This is because the German people would have not felt suppressed and would not support the rise of a leader like Hitler. So, even though I think that Lloyd George had the best approach considering the circumstances, the German people would still be repressed immensely if his terms were agreed to. Therefore, in hindsight I do agree with the thesis that Wilson did have the best approach for the sake of long lasting peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This did happen. * All land taken from Russia had to be handed back to Russia. This did happen though land in the western area became Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in keeping with the belief in national self-determination. * Germany's army had to be reduced to 100,000 men.

  2. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    As well as the USA must give even more money to prosper Europe, since USA's losses are much less than those of Europe. Controversies, however, are very foolish, since there is no reason from sacrifices equilibrium. 1. The amount of money England borrowed from the States were approximately the same

  1. The Allies punished Germany in the Treaty of Versailles because of the pressure exerted ...

    The people of the victorious countries, particularly in France and Britain, felt strongly that Germany was responsible for the war and should be punished. There was also a strong feeling that Germany should pay for all the damage and destruction caused by the war.

  2. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    These aims were not based around punishing Germany as such, but ensuring that no war of that escalation should happen again. Only 116,000 American soldiers died in the war; this is as they only entered the war in the last year.

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    He aimed at removing the secretive nature of European governments, allowing self determination for all people, and removing autocratic regimes. Wilson wanted to determine things in a way that he believed would prevent further conflict: establishing democracy, self determination, and open diplomacy.

  2. "The treaty of Versailles represented neither a Wilson peace nor a Clemenceau peace, but ...

    Woodrow Wilson had joined the war for idealistic reasons on the part of his country: propaganda across America portrayed her role in the war as champion for democracy and the savior of Europe. Wilson had also formulated, prior to the German Armistice, a list of "14-Points", based on which the latter had been signed.

  1. The Antarctic Treaty: When and why was the treaty formed?

    In 1958 the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) launched the Special Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) to provide an international coordinating organization for Antarctic science. At its first meeting in 1958, SCAR was entrusted with "furthering the coordination of scientific activity in the Antarctic, with a view to framing a scientific program of circumpolar scope and significance."

  2. Post War Peace -even though Wilsons conception was considered idealistic, it was the best ...

    Lloyd George was not too concerned regarding this issue, he, himself did not see the problem of the two countries combining. However, Lloyd George knew the people of Britain would not be keen on the two countries joining a union. In my opinion, Wilsonâs view would not restore lasting peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work