• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Would you consider that the Treaty of Versailles (1919) was a fair treatment? Justify your view. (1990)

Extracts from this document...


Wong Sin Hang??? 7A1 St. Gloria College 1995-96 Would you consider that the Treaty of Versailles (1919) was a fair treatment? Justify your view. (1990) It is true to say that the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 was a fair treatment on the side of some victorious powers because they got many national interests and only Germany, which was the major defeated country, accepted punishments. However, on the viewpoint of the defeated, it was a harsh and unfair treatment. Even some of the victorious countries, like China, Italy and Russia, as well as the USA regarded it as an unfair treatment. After the First World War, the Powers held the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. However, all the defeated countries and Russia were not invited and the Conference was dominated by President Wilson??? of the USA; Clemenceau????, Prime Minister of France; Lloyd George??�??, Prime Minister of Britain, i.e. the 'Big Three'. Among them, Clemenceau wanted to have revenge on Germany and weaken Germany as far as possible. In this Conference, the most important treaty was the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 with Germany. ...read more.


First of all, it helped the spread of nationalism and liberalism. Because of the principle of national self-determination, many new states were created. Besides, most new states and defeated countries became liberal republics. Moreover, the League of Nations created many humanitarian organs, e.g. Red Cross, World Health Organization and International Labour Organization. On the other side, it had its demerits. Firstly, the new states were too weak and unable to solve post-war problems and easy to be invaded by aggressors, e.g. Sudetenland??? by Hitler in 1939. Secondly, because of no invitation of the defeated countries and Russia to the Conference, it made them discontented and worsened the relationship between the western Powers and them. For example, Stalin of Russia never recognized the loss of the three Baltic States in the Versailles Treaty. Hitler in 1935-36 even ordered conscription, occupation of the Rhine, built up air forces, in 1938 annexed Austria, in 1939 annexed the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia and invaded Poland, which were all deliberate violations of the Versailles Treaty. Moreover, it also had effects upon the subsequent development of Italy and Japan. ...read more.


This absence of the US made the Versailles Treaty liable to be violated, as France and Britain were declining. No superpower was able to contain Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin. So, it is true to say that the Versailles Treaty sowed the seed of World War II. Lastly, it did not arrange methods to deal with the problem of economic recovery of Europe. The Powers only made the defeated countries pay indemnities. Thus, these countries were facing economic hardship in the 1920s and the whole of Europe was economically weak and unstable. After that, they could hardly survive the challenges of the Great Depression in the 1930s. Only the Soviet Union was not affected by the Great Depression. All in all, the Versailles Treaty solved some problems brought about by the First World War but actually it created more problems which partly led to the outbreak of the Second World War. So, on the side on some victorious countries that had got national interests, they would think that the Versailles Treaty was a fair treatment. On the other hand, the defeated countries and Russia were dissatisfied with this treatment. Besides, even some victorious countries like China, the USA and Italy felt discontented with this treatment although this treaty was directly or indirectly related to them. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

    4 star(s)

    Argument stating that the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 were unfair: The Treaty of Saint-Germain was incredibly unfair on Austria, Austria was forced to give up some of her wealthiest territory - over 6 million German speakers were placed in a new state.

  2. How Far Was The Treaty Of Versailles Fair?

    to be increasing with all the compensation and Germany's power weakening - the Prime Minister feared France becoming the dominating force in Europe. George may have demonstrated a slight sense of sympathy for the Germans in attempt to implicate his deprecation of the amount of compensation going through to France; because he felt they were becoming too powerful etc.

  1. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    It would be pointless creating a new country that has no meaning and that has no use. Much German land was given to other countries to make Germany weak. Alsace and Lorraine was returned back to France which was lost in the Prussian.

  2. Was the Treaty Of Versailles a Harsh Treaty?

    Source B which was written by a British historian in 1974 a long time after the war he says "it is no longer acceptable to blame the ultimate failure of the republic on the Treaty of Versailles", which could be true to a certain extent the treaty did weaken Germany

  1. The Treaty of Versailles created more problems than it solved. Discuss.

    and eventually cancelled with Lausanne (1932). The fact that these other negotiations had to occur show that the very idea of reparations was flawed. The fact also that French troops entered the Ruhr in 1923 because Germany had stopped payments also highlights what a failure reparations were.


    This automatically ignited hatred against the Treaty. To link in with this point, Germany was told it was not allowed many representatives inside the Paris Peace Conference so understandably, they felt their view was not heard and described the Treaty as a 'Diktat' (dictated unto them).

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    soldiers killed Italy: 600,000 soldiers Russia: 1,700,000 soldiers killed America: 116,000 soldiers killed Germany: 2,000,000 soldiers killed Austria-Hungary : 1,200,000 soldiers killed Turkey : 325,000 soldiers killed Bulgaria : 100,000 soldiers killed The treaty said that the following land belonging to Germany had to be given to other countries; Alsace-Lorraine (given to France)

  2. To what extent was The Treaty of Versailles fair, and what were the consequences ...

    Woodrow Wilson (USA) got his Fourteen Points accepted by the other countries and the League of Nations was set up. Lloyd George (England) wanted the German navy and colonies to be taken away so that England was not threatened in the future and to stop the French from taking the Rhineland.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work