• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WW1 and Changes In Weapons Technology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Wills Rance 8A2/8F December2010 Technology and World War One There were many technological advances in the First World War. Some of these advances were; Poison Gas, The Tank, Improvements to the Aeroplane, Portable Machine gun, the Hand Grenade. These advances made war fare a lot bloodier and battles drag on for longer as both sides were forced into a stale-mate. For instance, 100 years before, in the Battle of Waterloo which lasted for 3 days, out of 72,000 French soldiers 48,000 were killed, wounded, captured or missing and out of 118,000 Anglo and Prussian troops 25000 were killed, wounded, captured or missing. In the Battle of The Somme which lasted 144 days and took place 100 year after the Battle of Waterloo out of 1,000,000 French troops that took part in battle 220,000 soldiers were killed, wounded, captured or missing. Out of 1,000,000 British Troops that took part 420,000 were killed, wounded, captured or missing. The worst suffering army was the German army. Out of 1,000,000 German troops that were involved nearly 500,000 soldiers were killed, wounded, captured or missing. ...read more.

Middle

Originally there had been fifty of these machines but these thirty ton machines could not cope with the harsh lunar landscape of the churned up ground and fourteen had broken down or got bogged down. Tanks were used. Many German troops ran at the sight of the tank, it spread fear amongst the ranks in the Trenches. The first Tank offensive had been successful in the fact that they had scared the Germans, and that they had not been disabled immediately. As a trial though some were disappointed. Concerns that were raised included the fact that the view slits were too thin to be able to see much while moving, and they were targets for enemy gunshot; and the exhaust made too much noise and the heat could have set alight the fuel tank. A further issue raised was the amount of mud that found its way into the treads causing them to block up. Also after the initial fear of the Tank had gone they started to become easy targets to German artillery as they were often bogged down in the mud. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless the successful use of tanks at Cambrai restored dwindling faith in tank development. The U.S. army took note and undertook development of its own tank series. I think that the tank was not a success in World War One, but overall it has been a great success in the development of it. Today the Tank is one of the most effective weapons if used correctly. They now have bigger fuel tanks, better engines and better working conditions for their crew inside. Overall I think the tank has been a great success as it is now a very effective weapon. The Hand Grenade The second advance in World War One technology I have chose to talk to you about is the Hand Grenade. Early in World War I, both sides only had small grenades of a pre-war design. For example, in Italy, the Besozzi grenade had a five-second fuse with a match-tip that was ignited by striking on a ring on the soldier's hand. As an interim measure, the troops often improvised their own, such as the Jam Tin Grenade. These were replaced when manufactured versions such as the Mills bomb, the first modern fragmentation grenade, became available to British front-line troops. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Cartoon Analysis - WW1

    The depiction that America and Britain are just as bad, waiting there turn to destroy Germany (the bats outside the window in the cartoon) is also biased, as both Lloyd George (Britain) and President Wilson's (America) aims in the big three were no where near as harsh as Clemenceau's.

  2. Courses of WW1

    Kaiser Wilhelm II glorified war and militarism. This increased the suspicion between them and there was more tension. Many countries thought a war was bound to happen so they began to make detailed plans for what to do if it happened.

  1. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    It would have been a terrifying experience for the people who were attacked by chlorine gas but it could be seen and prevented by gas masks easily. Phosgene gas was also used in the war. It was twice as deadly as chlorine gas but had no affects on the victims' sight or skin.

  2. Justifications for WW1

    The willingness of ruling Europe through its territorial control, is what prompted England to commit to the war to avoid this happening. The relationship between Germany and England was tense enough for the latter not to accept Germany's territorial ambitions.

  1. Causes of WW1

    Although Russia and France had an alliance together and had promised to fight with each other, Britain only had an entente with Russia and France which meant she was only promising to talk. However Kaiser William II was not as clever as his predecessor Bismarck at making alliances with other countries.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    The Somme attack was now weaker than before, and couldn't hope to be as effective. However - by taking this action, the Allies had shown that the British and the French were working together, cooperating, proving their strategic military advantage of having two armies.

  1. Haig and The Somme

    shows his true colours and claims that he expressed his doubts to Haig and was worried that the Somme would be a huge failure. Lloyd George wrote source I because he had to agree with what Haig was doing and get fully behind him to show that he was in full confidence of Haig and the soldiers.

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    him many more times due to its success, but it was inevitable that this would back fire once the natives saw the repeated use of it. Custer's war tactics worked well for him in some ways, as he took 875 of their horses, and put them to death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work