• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WW1 and Changes In Weapons Technology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Wills Rance 8A2/8F December2010 Technology and World War One There were many technological advances in the First World War. Some of these advances were; Poison Gas, The Tank, Improvements to the Aeroplane, Portable Machine gun, the Hand Grenade. These advances made war fare a lot bloodier and battles drag on for longer as both sides were forced into a stale-mate. For instance, 100 years before, in the Battle of Waterloo which lasted for 3 days, out of 72,000 French soldiers 48,000 were killed, wounded, captured or missing and out of 118,000 Anglo and Prussian troops 25000 were killed, wounded, captured or missing. In the Battle of The Somme which lasted 144 days and took place 100 year after the Battle of Waterloo out of 1,000,000 French troops that took part in battle 220,000 soldiers were killed, wounded, captured or missing. Out of 1,000,000 British Troops that took part 420,000 were killed, wounded, captured or missing. The worst suffering army was the German army. Out of 1,000,000 German troops that were involved nearly 500,000 soldiers were killed, wounded, captured or missing. ...read more.

Middle

Originally there had been fifty of these machines but these thirty ton machines could not cope with the harsh lunar landscape of the churned up ground and fourteen had broken down or got bogged down. Tanks were used. Many German troops ran at the sight of the tank, it spread fear amongst the ranks in the Trenches. The first Tank offensive had been successful in the fact that they had scared the Germans, and that they had not been disabled immediately. As a trial though some were disappointed. Concerns that were raised included the fact that the view slits were too thin to be able to see much while moving, and they were targets for enemy gunshot; and the exhaust made too much noise and the heat could have set alight the fuel tank. A further issue raised was the amount of mud that found its way into the treads causing them to block up. Also after the initial fear of the Tank had gone they started to become easy targets to German artillery as they were often bogged down in the mud. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless the successful use of tanks at Cambrai restored dwindling faith in tank development. The U.S. army took note and undertook development of its own tank series. I think that the tank was not a success in World War One, but overall it has been a great success in the development of it. Today the Tank is one of the most effective weapons if used correctly. They now have bigger fuel tanks, better engines and better working conditions for their crew inside. Overall I think the tank has been a great success as it is now a very effective weapon. The Hand Grenade The second advance in World War One technology I have chose to talk to you about is the Hand Grenade. Early in World War I, both sides only had small grenades of a pre-war design. For example, in Italy, the Besozzi grenade had a five-second fuse with a match-tip that was ignited by striking on a ring on the soldier's hand. As an interim measure, the troops often improvised their own, such as the Jam Tin Grenade. These were replaced when manufactured versions such as the Mills bomb, the first modern fragmentation grenade, became available to British front-line troops. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Cartoon Analysis - WW1

    an amount, German hostility and cruelty that contributed to war and it is therefore biased to represent a woman as Germany. The French are depicted as evil and opportunistic in the way they gained assets from Germany, with their supposed main aim to make the Germans suffer as much as possible.

  2. Courses of WW1

    Kaiser Wilhelm II glorified war and militarism. This increased the suspicion between them and there was more tension. Many countries thought a war was bound to happen so they began to make detailed plans for what to do if it happened.

  1. How were the lives of women on the home front affected by WW1?

    A group of women, working at an aircraft works, had approached her in 1916. She wrote, "It was common, they told me for 6 or more of the 30 women dope painters to be lying ill on the stones outside the workshop..."

  2. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    It would have been a terrifying experience for the people who were attacked by chlorine gas but it could be seen and prevented by gas masks easily. Phosgene gas was also used in the war. It was twice as deadly as chlorine gas but had no affects on the victims' sight or skin.

  1. Causes of WW1

    This agreement meant Russian neutrality if France was to attack Germany. When Russia wanted to renew this treaty in 1890 Kaiser William II refused because he wanted to improve the British-German relations and Russia was not Britain's favourite country at that time.

  2. Who was to blam for WW1?

    Hitler thought Germany had lost W.W.I as they had to rely on other countries for war materials and this is why he wanted to achieve autarky (self-sufficiency) in Germany. His introduction of the four year plan seems to us to be an obvious way of Hitler saying he wanted a war.

  1. Assesement of Haig and other Generals in WW1

    Historians often evaluate the generals performances based on modern situations, but these were much different back then. It was more difficult to communicate. Carrier pigeons and dogs were often used to transmit messages. These were obviously not always accurate so delivering messages limited communication between generals, soldiers and their base,

  2. Nuclear Weapons and Disarmament

    Countries like India have over 60 nuclear weapons while countries like the USA have 10,500 nuclear weapons hence urging India to catch up and make more. People believe that it is like a competition to see who has the most and this makes it more dangerous because it can cause a chain reaction which can lead to huge destruction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work