• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe how the system of judicial precedent operates

Extracts from this document...


Describe how the system of judicial precedent operates Along with the principal of an independent judiciary, the notion of trial by ones peers is perhaps one of the most important aspects of our legal system. This is why any suggestions of moving away from this principle of trial by jury are always controversial. A jury is a body of 12 persons from a cross section of society sworn to heed testimony and evidence in Her Majesty's court; and make judgement based in the evidence presented to them: this is known as their verdict. The verdict of guilty or not guilty in precedent years has had to be reached by a unanimous verdict, however over recent years this prerequisite has been changed so that if a unanimous verdict is not reached after the given time the jury may reach a verdict by 11-1 or 10-2 majority, at the discretion of the judge. In most common law jurisdictions the jury is only responsible for the verdict; it is the judge who decides on chastisement. ...read more.


10-year period: any persons whom in the past 10-years had either a community sentence or order passed against them; in the past 10-years had a suspended sentence or served any sentence of imprisonment in the past 10 years. Anyone who is currently on bail in criminal proceedings is also disqualified. Moving away from disqualifications based on legal history is that of disabilities and state of mind, again any person whom relates to these disqualifications i.e. mentally ill or in some way disabled (blind) can also be disqualified. Another thing which may prohibit any person to take part in jury service is anyone whom is unable to verbalize fluent English as this could affect the outcome of the case. All those disqualified should be identified so that the Central Summoning Bureau can clearly see whom those people are on their records, however anyone who is chosen for jury service that is disqualified can be fined up to �5000 for failing to declare their disqualification. A process called vetting can be carried out to ensure they have no criminal record: in national security cases they may allow a wider background check. ...read more.


Once the jury has been chosen they are generally subjected to a system of examination. The defence and prosecution (plaintiff in civil cases) can object a juror. In most common countries this is known as voir dire. Any member may be challenged for example if they know the defendant or if they are disqualified. On rare occasions the whole jury is challenged due to them not being selected properly; a reason for this could be that they think it will be bias like R v Ford where it was a selected jury resulting in all jurors being of the same ethnic creed. When the court begins jurors are able to take notes throughout the trial. After all of the evidence is heard jurors go to a private room where they decide on their verdict the judge first asks for a unanimous verdict but may change to a majority verdict if one ; cannot be found this discussion must be kept between jurors; failure to do so could result in a fine or even a prison sentence as they have breached the Contempt of Court Act 1981. Once a decision has been made a foreman or forewoman announces a verdict to the court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    bound by its own previous decisions in the same way as the Court of Appeal, such as in the case of C (a minor) v DPP [1994]. When sitting as a court of first instance, the Divisional Court treats its own previous decisions as highly persuasive but is not strictly

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    act, nor can one argue against the presumption of a resulting trust by reliance on an illegal act. In Tinsley v Milligan25 it was held that the defendant could assert ownership of her equitable right, the principle that a litigant cannot rely on his own fraud or illegality to rebut the presumption of advancement was confirmed.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    This system would offer greater protection from individual bias, but there would still be no lay input and at over �100000 pa would work out rather expensive not just in salaries but in the extra training that would be needed to provide a 200% increase in the number of judges required to operate such a system.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    What is judicial precedent?

    3 star(s)

    This uncertainty is increased by the ability of judiciary to select which authority to follow through use of distinguishing cases on their facts.It also creates fixity, where this refers to the possibility that the law in relation

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    In Young V Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd (1944) the court of appeal stated that the civil division is bound by its own decisions but that there were three exceptions to this, i.e. in the following situations the civil division could depart from its own previous decisions (Where there are conflicting Court of Appeal decisions the Court of Appeal

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    do harm - R v Mowalt 1967 R v Grimshaw - Pushed glass into someone's face. Cut victim. Intention not needed to prove harm. 2. Level of harm � s47 = ABH S20 = GBH (If ABG proven, GBH also proven)

  1. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    The information above is taken from the BBC News website. In comparison to Wikipedia, the BBC is a much more credible source for information. This is for a number of reasons. Firstly, all reports have the name of the author at the beginning of the text.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    person whose title to the check was defective, he would be protected and would not be held liable in 'conversion' to the true owner, provided he proves that: (i) he acted in good faith and without negligence; (ii) the check was already crossed before it reached his hands; and (iii)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work