• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system

Extracts from this document...


Section A: Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system. Over many years people have become familiarised by the term 'jury'. It is an essential part of our legal system, and can be traced back to the middle ages. In the Magna Carta, 1215, Clause 39 of the charter basically says that no man shall be imprisoned unless decided by his peers. It seemed a fair way to sentence someone. Juries have, however, normally still been under the power of the judge. Judges were allowed to fine or punish juries that come up with a verdict different to what he thinks himself. The independence of the jury finally happened in Bushel's Case, 1670. This happened following the trial of William Penn, who was being tried for unlawful speaking. Edward Bushel was a juror in the trial. All of the jury were treated unfairly, and eventually imprisoned, for the verdict that they came to. Whilst in prison, Bushel filed a writ of habeas corpus, which is a legal procedure that allows prisoners to argue the legality of their imprisonment. Chief Justice Vaughan agreed with Bushel and ordered the confined jurors to be released. Bushel's Case is very important in law because it basically invented jury nullification. The court made it clear that it is by the decision of the jury, not judge, that someone will be sentenced. ...read more.


Summoning the jury is how the process starts. A jury summoning computer has a special copy of the electoral register, marked with the names of people eligible. Then a list of 150 people is made, whom all of which will be sent a notice saying that they have been summoned, and also explaining ineligibility, excusals etc. the potential jurors must then appear at the court to be questioned to determine any unfair biases and if they are qualified for service. Lists of jurors are then made of different people to send to various courts around England. A jury of 12 is then selected by ballot from the panel in open court. The chosen jury must then be vetted. There are 2 kinds of jury vetting that have been authorised to be used. These are the checking of criminal records, and the checking of special branch and security services records in cases involving national security or terrorist attacks. Any other records are not allowed to be checked, as this is an invasion of privacy. Records must be checked in order to make sure that people are qualified for the role. Jury challenging is a process in which the defence and prosecution can argue that the jury chosen is biased. Defence alone can argue that the whole jury has been chosen in a biased or unrepresentative way. ...read more.


When a jury need to come to a decision they must exit the courtroom and enter a private room to discuss the case they just saw. Everything that goes on in the room must be strictly confidential. No-one other than the jurors may know what happened and the jury cannot tell people either. If a juror does tell someone anything they are guilty of contempt of the court and can either be fined or sent to prison. When a jury retires to the room, they are told that they must all agree on a verdict. The decision must be unanimous. However, if more than 2 hours have been spent where the jury are trying to come to a unanimous decision, the judge will ask them to return to the courtroom and then tell them they can reach a majority decision. For a majority decision to be allowed at least ten jurors must agree. The vote can then be either 11-1 or 10-2. When a jury falls below eleven jurors then at least nine of these must agree. Once a jury has decided on a verdict, they must return to the courtroom and the clerk will ask what decision they have come to. The foreman or forewoman on the jury (the spokesperson) must say whether the verdict is guilty or not guilty, and whether it was a unanimous or majority verdict. If the verdict is guilty by majority, the spokesperson must say how many jurors agreed. The judge will then sentence the defendant. If the verdict is not guilty then the defendant will be acquitted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Distinguish Criminal law from Civil law in the English Legal System. Outline the jurisdiction ...

    4 star(s)

    The normal limit for claims in contract and tort is ?5,000, whilst in personal injury cases the amount can be ?0,000. Cases involving larger amounts may still be heard by agreement. Equity cases e.g. trust is limited to ?0,000. Most have a divorce jurisdiction.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    Bristol Aeroplane. This includes situations where its own previous decisions conflict. The judges would then have the discretion to follow the precedent which they feel is more preferably and less likely to result in injustices. Also, the judges would have the choice to not follow a previous precedent of the

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    A recent Home Office research4 project suggests that only about a third of them are available to do it. It shows that, in a sample of 50,000 people summoned for jury service in June and July 1999, only one-third was available for service, about half of whom were allowed to defer their service until a later date.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    1861 - 1983 Wilson The law was interpreted so as: - MR. = Intention or Subjective Recklessness to assault or battery + AR = Actual injuries = Soreness = s47 + AR = Grievous injuries = Fractures =s20 If s47 can not be proven, then s20 can not either.

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    A major influence on English law and on the English legal system has been our membership of the European Community. In spite of the rhetoric of politicians there is no doubt that by joining the EC the United Kingdom gave up some of its sovereignty.

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    In an ice breaking statement Sedley LJ stated that; 'We have reached a point at which it can be said with confidence that the law recognises and will appropriately protect a personal right to privacy'. He later acknowledged that this would be 'grounded in the equitable doctrine of breach of confidence'.

  1. Pre Trial Procedure in Criminal Cases

    9.2 Bail An important pre trial matter is whether to grant bail. A person can be released on bail any point after being arrested. 9.2.1 Police power to grant bail * May release suspect while further inquiries are made. Must return at given date.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    this simply means that in case the endorsement of the payee subsequently comes out to be a forged one, the verifier will be liable to the original payee and not the banker. The banker is also protected against forged endorsements in case of `bank drafts' (Sec.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work