• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European Union Law (LS2011)

Extracts from this document...


European Union Law (LS2011) Question 6: "The role of general principles in EU law is opaque and uncertain." Discuss. Student ID: 03157563 Since the founding European Community Treaties of the 1950's there has been a noticeable evolution in regards to the lack of provisions concerning the protection of human rights in the conduct of the Community affairs. Primarily this evolution was the work of The Court of Justice, who stated that "the 'general principles of EC law' include protection for fundamental rights which are part of the common constitutional traditions of Member States."1 Article 249 of the EC treaty lays out the sources from which the Community may govern, with greatest emphasis being placed on regulations and directives. However, there are 'softer' forms of law, which have been adopted due to their natural and logical evolution in practice. The 'general principles', inspired by the common traditions and constitutional rules shared by the Member States, fall into this category, and are thus used more as aids to legal interpretation rather than definitions of the law itself. These general principles of EU law include; 1) Legal certainty and legitimate expectations, (the knowledge of citizens of the likely legal consequences of their actions); 2) Proportionality, (originally a German based principle that the ECJ has adopted, which says that "it must be ascertained whether the means which it employs are suitable for the purpose of achieving the desired objective and whether they go beyond what is necessary to achieve it."2); 3) ...read more.


The former of which was referred to in the case of Hauer12, a case also useful when looking at the application of specific provisions of a particular nations constitution. Here the applicant was refused authorization to plant new vines on her land due to the EC Council having passed a regulation forbidding any new planting in that region. On appeal to the German court, on the grounds of incompatibility of the Council Regulations with the German Constitution, it was found that "if it were incompatible with fundamental German constitutional rights, the Regulation might be inapplicable in Germany"13. Other international sources that the Court utilises include the European Social Charter. This was so in the case of Defrenne14, where the court, "deeming the elimination of sex discrimination to be a fundamental Community right, supported its conclusion by noting that 'the same concepts are recognised by the European Social Charter and by Convention No. 111 of the International Labour Organisation concerning discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.'"15 The relative vastness of sources from which the Court obtains its legal backing when applying the general principles, from countries constitutions and numerous European sources, may be seen to create a high degree of uncertainty when deciding the law, however, to look at it in a more positivistic view, one could approach it with the viewpoint that the Court is merely trying to encompass all relevant law in an attempt to create a consistent foundation from which the law may be derived. ...read more.


c) A third concern is that the Court has effectively become yet another European Court of Human Rights. However, juxtaposed with these sceptical outlooks are opinions emanating more positivistic approaches to the role of general principles as governed by the Charter. These include; in the case of P v. S24 and the case of Schroder25 where Advocate General Tesauro displays an approach towards cases which takes the judgement away from any economic, benefits and instead focuses upon the "dignity of the individual and the value of equality as a fundamental human right."26 These and other such encouraging approaches have led to arguments that if a more encompassing commitment could be made to ensure respect for fundamental human rights then the EU could develop the ethical foundation which so far it lacks. Overall, regardless of the changing and progressively enhanced status of human rights within the EU and EU law, the evolution of the general principles and fundamental rights have come under a great extent of criticism. However, such human rights issues as are embedded within the general principles have been enjoying an increasingly higher profile within EU law, particularly in the wake of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. More specifically the general principles display a "broad and non-exhaustive"27 category taken from the constitutions of Member States and administrative traditions. This width of jurisdiction is ever increasing with some principles, formerly not recognised by EU law, now gaining that recognition, for example the developing transparency principle, which has now been 'concretised' in secondary legislation. However, the general principles will always remain relatively opaque and uncertain unless the legal status of the Charter for Fundamental Rights is finally settled. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    Donegild next intercepts the return letter from Aella, which voices his compassionate acceptance of the fabricated news, and substitutes her own missive, which directs that Custance and her son are to be exiled from the country, set adrift in the sea.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Charged with unlawful act 1. MR? Yes (for a crime) 2. Crime? Yes 3. Was it dangerous? He said no because he thought she was already dead The jury was directed it was an objective test and concluded it was.

  1. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    The doctrine of Re Rose is concerned with whether a purported gift at law which is ineffective can nevertheless take effect as a gift of equity. Recently the case of Pagarani18 brought up the same point of law, also concerning shares.

  2. Outline the approach of the European Court of Justice in Van Gend en Loos, ...

    It can be seen that direct effect gives rights to individuals against their member states; this is known as a vertical relationship as the individuals are beneath the state in a hierarchy.6 In the above case of Van Gend en Loos individual rights are talked of and so an individual

  1. 'The European Court of Justice played a decisive role in the transformation of the ...

    The doctrine that established the supremacy of Community law and of direct effects both owe their basis to the judicial creativity of the Court of Justice. It is clear that within the E.C Treaty there is no reference to be found which suggests that Community law shall be supreme, nor to the impression that it shall be directly effective.

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    PACE is separated into sections for easy access. Legal powers of the police are governed by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act most commonly known as PACE this act was created in 1984 to give the police a guideline as to how to cat and when different actions where appropriate

  1. Eureopean Union & Child Protection with reference to UK

    Act which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) into the English Law, has both a complimentary as well as conflicting role through its provision for adults and children alike . Family Law Practitioners have consistently been pointing out the contradiction between the welfare principle that

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    of a note or the drawee of a check is not necessary as they are the principal debtors and primarily liable on the instrument, and they must pay on the due date at the proper place. It is they who dishonor the instrument by non-acceptance or non-payment, and to give

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work