• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European Union Law (LS2011)

Extracts from this document...


European Union Law (LS2011) Question 6: "The role of general principles in EU law is opaque and uncertain." Discuss. Student ID: 03157563 Since the founding European Community Treaties of the 1950's there has been a noticeable evolution in regards to the lack of provisions concerning the protection of human rights in the conduct of the Community affairs. Primarily this evolution was the work of The Court of Justice, who stated that "the 'general principles of EC law' include protection for fundamental rights which are part of the common constitutional traditions of Member States."1 Article 249 of the EC treaty lays out the sources from which the Community may govern, with greatest emphasis being placed on regulations and directives. However, there are 'softer' forms of law, which have been adopted due to their natural and logical evolution in practice. The 'general principles', inspired by the common traditions and constitutional rules shared by the Member States, fall into this category, and are thus used more as aids to legal interpretation rather than definitions of the law itself. These general principles of EU law include; 1) Legal certainty and legitimate expectations, (the knowledge of citizens of the likely legal consequences of their actions); 2) Proportionality, (originally a German based principle that the ECJ has adopted, which says that "it must be ascertained whether the means which it employs are suitable for the purpose of achieving the desired objective and whether they go beyond what is necessary to achieve it."2); 3) ...read more.


The former of which was referred to in the case of Hauer12, a case also useful when looking at the application of specific provisions of a particular nations constitution. Here the applicant was refused authorization to plant new vines on her land due to the EC Council having passed a regulation forbidding any new planting in that region. On appeal to the German court, on the grounds of incompatibility of the Council Regulations with the German Constitution, it was found that "if it were incompatible with fundamental German constitutional rights, the Regulation might be inapplicable in Germany"13. Other international sources that the Court utilises include the European Social Charter. This was so in the case of Defrenne14, where the court, "deeming the elimination of sex discrimination to be a fundamental Community right, supported its conclusion by noting that 'the same concepts are recognised by the European Social Charter and by Convention No. 111 of the International Labour Organisation concerning discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.'"15 The relative vastness of sources from which the Court obtains its legal backing when applying the general principles, from countries constitutions and numerous European sources, may be seen to create a high degree of uncertainty when deciding the law, however, to look at it in a more positivistic view, one could approach it with the viewpoint that the Court is merely trying to encompass all relevant law in an attempt to create a consistent foundation from which the law may be derived. ...read more.


c) A third concern is that the Court has effectively become yet another European Court of Human Rights. However, juxtaposed with these sceptical outlooks are opinions emanating more positivistic approaches to the role of general principles as governed by the Charter. These include; in the case of P v. S24 and the case of Schroder25 where Advocate General Tesauro displays an approach towards cases which takes the judgement away from any economic, benefits and instead focuses upon the "dignity of the individual and the value of equality as a fundamental human right."26 These and other such encouraging approaches have led to arguments that if a more encompassing commitment could be made to ensure respect for fundamental human rights then the EU could develop the ethical foundation which so far it lacks. Overall, regardless of the changing and progressively enhanced status of human rights within the EU and EU law, the evolution of the general principles and fundamental rights have come under a great extent of criticism. However, such human rights issues as are embedded within the general principles have been enjoying an increasingly higher profile within EU law, particularly in the wake of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. More specifically the general principles display a "broad and non-exhaustive"27 category taken from the constitutions of Member States and administrative traditions. This width of jurisdiction is ever increasing with some principles, formerly not recognised by EU law, now gaining that recognition, for example the developing transparency principle, which has now been 'concretised' in secondary legislation. However, the general principles will always remain relatively opaque and uncertain unless the legal status of the Charter for Fundamental Rights is finally settled. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    However, the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (s39) tells us that these offences are summary with a maximum penalty of 6 moths custodial sentence and/or �5,000 fine. Definitions COMMON ASSAULT - Words and action 'Causing the victim to apprehend immediate physical harm' R v Fagan 1969 - 'It is to intentionally

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    With "feminine wiles," Boccaccio explains, she "masqueraded as a man and pretended to be her own son": Semiramis's face looked very much like her son's; both were beardless; her woman's voice sounded no different from her young son's; and she was just a trifle taller, if at all.

  1. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    Re Rose allows a more relaxed interpretation of the requirement in Milroy which can now be understood as: the settlor must have done everything within his power which, according to the nature of the property comprised in the settlement, was necessary to be done in order to transfer the property and render the settlement binding upon him.

  2. Effectiveness of the law in gaining justice for society.

    This is a significant issue if the legal system is to effectively gain justice for all members of society, including older people. Society is concerned that because a younger person may not have the years of understanding necessary to form an analysis of their actions, that they may be receiving

  1. 'The European Court of Justice played a decisive role in the transformation of the ...

    Within the UK, the House of Lords is such a court as there are no grounds for appeal after this court. Article 234 has been central for the growth of Community law and as a result of references through this particular channel; the Court of Justice has developed the concept of direct effect and supremacy.

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Taking of hostages; (c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment; (d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples In article 13

  1. Explain how constitutional conventions differ from laws and discuss, with the use of examples, ...

    feeling of uncertainty in relation to what a "general direction"9 was, hence there was done another one in 1987. Moreover, it is also "not clear that no conventions are enforced by court"10; there have been a number of cases where conventions were put into force by courts in order to make a decision.

  2. The Supreme Court of Canada and the Charter: Democratic or Anti-Democratic?

    This proves that Keegstra's individual freedom of expression was violated, as the rights of the group, his students, were considered 'more important'. Under section 2a and 2b of the Charter, each individual has the right to the following fundamental freedoms: the freedom of conscience and religion and the freedom of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work