• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Find two cases on Indigenous customary law and discuss how they relate to the recognition of Indigenous customary law in Australia(TM)s legal system

Extracts from this document...


PART B Find two cases on Indigenous customary law and discuss how they relate to the recognition of Indigenous customary law in Australia's legal system. Aboriginal customary law as well as any other law is shaped by the individual and culture of the society. Today in Australian society the use of a combination of customary aboriginal laws and western laws are used in an effort to satisfy and maintain stability in the Aboriginal and wider community. In the study of the Mabo case and the case of Minor, it can be seen that conflicts may arise due to the differences in law, in the case of Mabo , Meanwhile the combination of traditional aboriginal law and The High Court's decision in the Mabo v Queensland became an important milestone in the recognition of Indigenous customary law in the Australian legal system. It left behind the myth that Australia was terra nullius and as a precedent highlighted that there was no longer a lawful reason as to why customary law is not taken into consideration in some indigenous cases. The case was brought forward by Eddie Mabo, David Passi and James Rice who all were Miriam people from the Murray Island in the Torres Straits. ...read more.


to a criminal jurisdiction. Customary laws were not recognised in common law but rather seen as precluding the existence of competing Aboriginal criminal jurisdictions. His Honours states "Even if it be assumed that customary criminal law of Aboriginal people survived British settlement, it was extinguished by the passage of criminal statutes of general application. In Mabo (No 2), the court held that there was no inconsistency between native title being held by people of Aboriginal descent and the underlying radical title being vested in the Crown. There is no analogy with the criminal law"4 Even though there was evidence of the existence of a native law, the situation of the Mabo case is substantially different to a criminal jurisdiction. In holding a criminal status the application of traditional laws is not applicable to offenders, they are to be treated like any other criminals under the general common law. However nonetheless Courts still incorporate and take into consideration of customary laws in certain cases. The Mabo case provided a gateway for many other indigenous cases who argue the right for the traditional customary law to be taken into consideration, many cases like Coe v Commonwealth and R v Wilson Jagamara Walker5 were some of the first few cases that argued that there was no longer a lawful reason as to not to take account of aboriginal customary laws. ...read more.


In order to give fairer sentences and more just decisions it is necessary to take into consideration of the offender's context and make decision's that are in the best interest in the offender's community as well as the wider community. Through the study of the two cases Mabo v Queensland and R v Minor, we notice how customary laws are incorporated and considered in the Australian Legal system. The Mabo case was a significant in helping the recognition of the native laws of the indigenous people, which lead to cases like the case of Minor where traditional punishment was considered in the final sentencing of the respondent. 1 Mabo and Ors v The State of Queensland (No.2) (1992) 175 CLR 1. 2 Meyers, G. D. & Muller, S. C. Through the Eyes Of The Media (Part 1): A Brief History of the Political and Social Responses to Mabo v Queensland (Murdoch University Environmental Law and Policy Centre, 1995). 3R v Minor (1992) 59 a crim r 227 (1) 4 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23 5 Law reform Commission "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/alrc/custlaw2/286.html" Aboriginal customary law, viewed 9th June 2008 6 (1992) 59 A Crim R 227 7 (1992) 59 A Crim R 227 8 (1992) 59 A Crim R 227 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law of Evidence - R v Kearley

    5 star(s)

    Everyday experience in this case suggests that the evidence was indicative that the defendant was a drug dealer. One associates a drug dealer with customers and frequent callers, a point made by Hirst. The nature of the word 'dealer' imports an element of potential customers and someone who can sell the product to potential customers.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Distinguish Criminal law from Civil law in the English Legal System. Outline the jurisdiction ...

    4 star(s)

    The Chancery Division evolved from the old Court of Chancery, which specialised in equity matters - trusts, mortgages - but now includes wills, company law and partnership law. There are special courts dealing with Companies, Bankruptcy and, more recently, a Patents Court.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - C shot victim with air rifle. Hit victim in the eye. Massive hemorrhage of eye, but no blood spilt. Indictment wrong, therefore found not guilty. Should be inflicting GBH, not malicious wounding. Inflict � Old law suggested that type word 'inflict' required the injuries required the commission of an actual assault.

  2. Describe the main differences between solicitors and barristers with regard to training and work ...

    Currently employing two lawyers means that a solicitor produces all the paper work, which then has to be duplicated and given to the barrister when handing over the case. This is wasteful and also increases costs. This could be avoided if the two professions were fused as only one lawyer

  1. Pre Trial Procedure in Criminal Cases

    prosecution the right to appal against a grant of bail by magistrates to a person charged with AO. Someone arrested and charged for an offence which he would generally not be imprisoned must be given bail unless: * previously failed to surrender to bail * he must be kept in

  2. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    If this is properly conducted, it can be considered humane. This is carried out by breaking the neck, and the time taken for death varies depending on the free-fall distance. Intoxicating one with poisonous gas, or otherwise known as the lethal gas method is currently used in six states, including California and Arizona.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    But a notice by a stranger is a mere nullity for a valid notice can be given only by a parson who is liable on the instrument at the time of the notice or by his agent. Notice of dishonor to the acceptor of a bill or to the maker

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Bradley & Quirk profitable to do so." What she is saying, is that people will put time and effort into their property only if they have a guarantee that the work that they have put into something is recognized and protected by the government. But like all law, there are some politics involved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work