• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In order for a court to decide how to distinguish a fixture from a chattel the courts generally consider two tests in deciding the issue: the degree of annexation of the object to the land; and the purpose of the annexation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(a) In order for a court to decide how to distinguish a fixture from a chattel the courts generally consider two tests in deciding the issue: the degree of annexation of the object to the land; and the purpose of the annexation When considering the degree of annexation the general rule is that 'unless an item is physically attached to the land, it will not be considered as a fixture'.1 However this is some cases is not always true and so it becomes necessary to add a third category to 'fixtures and fittings', that is to say, 'items which are brought onto the land and become part of it, without properly being regarded as fixtures at all'.2 A recent case in which this issue arose was Elitestone v. Morris.3 The main question in the case was whether or not the bungalow on the land was a building or a chattel. The court held that the bungalow was part of the land as the building was unlike a mobile home because it could only be removed from the site by being destroyed, and so it was inappropriate to consider whether or not the bungalow was a fixture as to regard something as a fixture it must first be attached to a building. Traditionally when looking at purpose of annexation the courts will look at whether an object was affixed with the intention of making it a permanent improvement to the land or was it attached in order to use of display the chattel. ...read more.

Middle

But works of art which were placed in a building primarily to be enjoyed as objects in their own right, rather than forming part of the land or the building are not likely to be properly considered as fixtures and so it is not that the law lack coherence and certainty but that each case should be decided on its own individual facts and so the law should remain as it stands. 1 Thompson, M.P., Modern Land Law Second Edition, Oxford 2003, p. 14 2 Thompson, M.P., Modern Land Law Second Edition, Oxford 2003, p. 7 3 [1997] 1 W.L.R. 687; H Conway [1998] Conv. 418. 4 [1902] A.C. 157. 5 [1977] 241 E.G. 911. 6 (1866) L.R. 3 Eq. 382. 7 [1872] L.R. 7 C.P. (b) If a chattel is found on someone's land and the true owner cannot be located the general rule is that the finder of an item acquires a good title against all but the true owner, as the true owner will always have a superior title to the object in question than the finder or the landowner. This is shown in the case of Moffat v. Kazana.1 In this case the plaintiff hid bank notes in a biscuit tin in his house. Later when he sold the house, one of the workmen discovered the money and so he contended for the money to be returned. ...read more.

Conclusion

Fletcher.8 In which the defendant, when using a metal detector, found a brooch, but as the council had already stipulated that no digging was allowed in the park, his actions were seen as that of trespassing and so severely weakening his right to the object in question. The finding rule also excludes items which are found but where the land owner has expressed an intention to exercise control over any objects found on their land. An example of this issue is shown by Donaldson LJ in Parker v British Airways Board.9 He said the plaintiffs "rights could only be displaced by the defendants if they could show as occupiers an obvious intention to exercise such control over the lounge and things in it". In conclusion the law on finding objects on or beneath the surface of somebody else's land seems satisfactory as the general rule applied in the common law give a clear outline as to has rights over objects found. The exclusions to these rules are also satisfactory in that they are reasonable and clear for anyone to understand. The only disputes over the law are where different parties will use different areas of this law to support their claim however the rule of common law always prevails in giving the correct answer. 1 [1969] 2 Q.B. 152. 2 (1866) 33 Ch.D. 562. 3 [1862] 2 Q.B. 44. 4 Treasure Act 1996 5 Petroleum (Production) Act 1934 s.1; Coal Industry Act 1994, s.9. 6 (1722) 5 Stra 505 7 [1982] 1 All E.R 8 [1996] Q.B. 334. 9 [1982] 1 All E. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    the judge after hearing the prosecution evidence: 2% Acquitted by a jury: 7.7% So we can deduce that of those committed for trial at Crown Court the remaining 55.3% were found guilty by a jury and that the total judged by a jury was 63% and that juries found around 87.8% of those defendants they judged guilty13.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Case law on consent An examination of case law would suggest that under English law at the eminent the defence of consent only extends to common battery even when there is good evidence of consent between consenting adults the courts appear to be unwilling to accept it.

  1. To What Extent Have the Main Aims of the Land Registration Acts Been Met?

    Therefore, it follows that a significant amount of land is still held under the unregistered system. Eventually, virtually all land will become registered but until then two systems of land conveyancing are in operation. There are several fundamental principles and aims which form the basis for registered conveyancing.

  2. Metafiktion er betegnelsen for den type af sknlitteratur, film og drama, som gr opmrksom ...

    L�seren har den f�lelse af, at det er Elnazred der fort�ller historien, men i virkeligheden er det jo til Mira Jama, der har fortalt denne historie til den ukendte fort�ller i den yderste historie. I historie V overtager kuffertfisken historien og l�seren bliver vi kastet ind i et nyt univers.

  1. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    Where a defendant is charged with an offence triable only on indictment, or elects jury trial for an either-way offence, the magistrates are still responsible for the committal hearing. Even if the defendant is content to be tried summarily, the magistrates may still commit him for trial for an either-way

  2. Contact orders

    And understanding is not absolute. It has to be assessed relative to the issues of the case". This is very objective and dependent on the facts of the case. It is a delicate and difficult issue to determine a child's true wishes as was held in Re: CT (minor)

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    It cannot be raised as a defense against a holder in due course. In result it will discharge certain parties to the instrument and not the instrument itself, unless expressly agreed. 4. By Renunciation: A negotiable instrument is discharged when, the holder renounces or gives up his right against all the parties to the instrument.

  2. Petrol excise should not be excluded

    As a nation we have no moral imperative to increase Australia's foreign aid budget, when the high rate of money we already send is not helping the situation in foreign countries, but in-turn we could utilise that same money to help with problems within our own borders and there's plenty of them too!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work