• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Law
  • Word count: 3332

In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within the modern tradition of equity, it is important to understand the history and development of Equity.

Extracts from this document...


In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within the modern tradition of equity, it is important to understand the history and development of Equity. Equity is the body of law developed by the Court of Chancery in England before 1873. Its justification was that it corrected, supplemented and amended the common law. It softened and changed many injustices inherent in common law and provided remedies where at law they were either inadequate or non-existent. Equity looks to substance rather than form, thus enabling it to give effect to the true intentions of parties to a transaction where the strict legal position does not reflect those intentions. Equity does not operate on its own. There never is equity without law. Wherever the Common Law grants rights and duties to the civilian population at large, equity regulates the conscientious use of those legal powers and the discharge of the legal duties. Equity is not distinct from law but a distinct feature of law. Equity's origin was the exercise, by the Chancellor, of the residual discretionary power of the King to do justice among his subjects in circumstances in which, for one reason or another, justice could not be obtained in a common law court. In the early seventeenth century the competition between 'common law' and 'Chancery' came to a head in the Earl of Oxford Case1. In this case the common law court gave a verdict in favour of one party and the Court of Equity then issued an injunction to prevent that party enforcing that judgement. After the outcome of this case it was decided that in cases of conflict between common law and equity, equity will prevail. The Judicature Act 1873 "fused" the administration of law and equity by the creation of the High Court of Judicature exercising both law and equity and gave supremacy to equity in cases of conflict. ...read more.


The subject of the trust must also be certain. If, for example, the trust involved the transfer of shares, that amount of shares must be certain. Uncertain objects may indicate uncertain intention as was the case in Lambe v Eames9. This case involved a gift by a testator to his widow of his entire estate "to be at her disposal in any way she may think best for the benefit of herself and her family." The wording makes it unclear as to whether he intended a gift to his wife or a trust where his wife would be a trustee and her family would be the beneficiaries. It was held to be ineffective to create a trust and the widow took the estate absolutely. Finally, Lord Langdale said that the third requirement is certainty of object. The beneficiary or beneficiaries under the trust must be a calculable amount. Declaring that "all employees and their families" are beneficiaries would be too vague for the court to declare it to be a valid fixed trust. Lord Evershed stated in Re Endacott10, that "in order [for a fixed trust] to be effective, [it] must have ascertained or ascertainable beneficiaries." These three certainties must be satisfied for the protection of the trustees. If the trustees do not know the terms of the trust they might breach the trust and be personally liable for any loss. In the case of Morice v Bishop of Durham11, Sir William Grant said that "there can be no trust over the exercise of which this court will have no control, for an uncontrollable power of disposition would be ownership and not a trust." In order for a trust to be controlled by the courts, its object and subject must be certain. A trust is said to be completely constituted when "the trust property is vested in trustees for the benefit of beneficiaries; until that has been done the trust is incompletely constituted" There are three ways to benefit an intended donee. ...read more.


The courts now increasingly recognise that unconscionability is the foundation of many of the principles of equity. The case of Pennington will prove indispensable for those seeking to uphold gifts which are not formally complete. An appeal to unconscionability or benevolent principles of construction may enable a successful argument that the gift is valid even though the donee has not in his possession the documents necessary to obtain legal title. To conclude, the case of Strong v Bird required that the donor to have the relevant intention and that their intention stayed fresh until the donor's death. Milroy, required that the settlor do everything which is required to transfer property of that type. Re Rose required the donee only to do whatever was within his powers, Pagarani allowed the "words used" to create a gift on trust and finally Pennington was decided because the judge felt that it would be unconscionable for the donor to change their mind. From all these changes in the past one thing has become clear: As noble as the 'ideology' of equity is, it largely depends on the judge and how he feels on that certain day. There is a lot of debate about which decisions are good law and which are bad law but at the end of the day it's up to the judges. Donors' intentions die with them. It is impossible for anyone to be precise about the intentions of a dead person. Even if the donor put his or her wishes and intentions in a will, if that will is read by one hundred people, there will be many variations of the donors' intentions. Equity, just like its Common Law brother, should be decided on case law and not maxims and dead peoples conscious. Approaches within modern equity to disputes concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trust have changed and will continue to change. Equity, compared to the common law, is very young and the outcome of cases, unlike the common law, is difficult to predict because it depends on how the court perceives the justice of the individual case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    But it arises whether or not the transferor intended to retain a beneficial interest - he almost always does not - since it responds to the absence of any intention on his part to pass a beneficial interest to the recipient".5 Already it has become clear that there is considerable

  2. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    There have been attempts recently to remove the rights of defendants to a jury trial in either way offences and allow Magistrates to decide on which cases can be referred to Crown Court. This would undoubtedly remove the defendant's ability to manipulate the system.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    In conclusion, the officer's actions towards Tyrone was in breach of the Code of Practice stated in the PACE Act 1984. Homer Simpson, aged 35, has been arrested for the murder of Ned Flanders. Explain and comment on how Homer's rights are protected during his detention The police must respect Homer's civil rights.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Eventually the courts decided that s18 GBH could be committed recklessly providing that the defendant was resisting lawful apprehension. R v Morrison 1989 - Resisted arrest when trying to escape form the police. He escaped through a window. The police officer cut herself.

  1. There are two types of trusts , private and public trusts. A private trust ...

    Also the courts and the Charity Commissioners under s. 4 of the Charities ACT 1960 have built up a large number of case law. This is why Warburton argues that " often it ( case law) may appear illogical and capricious.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The bank or financial institution on which the check is drawn is the drawee. The payee can indorse the check to another person, thereby making that receiver a holder. A holder is a person who is in rightful possession of an instrument that is drawn to that person's order (or drawn to bearer)

  1. Analysis of Performance - Badminton.

    catching it as it is fed over the net creates hand-eye co-ordination and improves agility. Racquet work will be where you are being fed a shuttle and repeating a shot to improve it, moving on to a game situation. Cardio-Vascular endurance, Muscular endurance and Agility are three essential components of fitness in badminton.

  2. Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have ...

    Besides that contrary with common law, equity recognises trust and mortgages. Equity recognises and enforce the rights of the beneficiary. While for mortgages, equity provides a means 'equity of redemption' which gave the mortgagor the right to redeem the property after the set date provided certain formalities are complied with.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work