• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law : Juries & Judges

Extracts from this document...


Law Coursework Jury Trial within the English Legal System. The Jury system throughout England is one, which manages to give the public the chance to play a vital part in the legal system. This gives you the chance to see what is going on throughout the law and informs you what happens in court. You, as a juror will usually be involved in the more serious criminal cases such as burgluary, theft and drug offences. It would be less likely that you would be sitting in a case about murder or rape. The trial which you would attend would be seen in the Crown Court. However, sometimes a juror would be needed in a civil case, which would be heard at either the High Court or County Court. Although a jury would be less likely to be in a civil case than a criminal case. The usual amount of people on a dury is 12, usually there will be a cross-section of the society in order to get a fair and unbiased trial. Your aim as a jury would be to consider the evidence and then reach a verdict of 'guilty' or 'not guilty.' In order to be able to become a juror you have to have some certain qualities, such as: * Between 18 and 70 years of age. * On the electoral register to vote. * Lived in the UK, Channel Islands or Isle of Man for at least 5 years since the age of 13. ...read more.


He/She even may give a brief overview of the law involved. The 12 of you then proceed to the jury room, where you discuss your verdict. The usher escorts you to the jury room, where by considering all the evidence you reach a verdict. You then would have been given an indictment, which is a list of offences the defendant is charged with. After the verdict has been reached you would then be asked, if you are the foremen, the verdict by the clerk. Once you have given your decision your work would have been completed. If you found the defendant guilty the judge may have sentence him/her then or could have asked for pre-sentencing reports to be written the probation service. The defendant would then attend court at a later date. Once this is completed you would then be escorted once again by the usher to the Jury Assemble Area. You also would be expected to report back to the court officials after a trial, as you could be part of another jury within your two-week service. Now I have mentioned the way in which the jury service operates, do you think it works? How efficient is the service? Does it really help the community? Is it just too inconvenient? Well, this is the next part of my coursework. I will explain the advantages, but as you know, with many advantages comes many disadvantages, however I will also express my opinions and some other people opinions towards this system. ...read more.


Whilst this cuts down the public involvement is also cuts down on costs, although most of the disadvantages I have mentioned about a jury would still apply. So, what is your method? I believe that by deciding upon a method which contains a judge to look over the case would be an efficient way of operating, whilst having a jury to make up their mind as this would ensure the idea of unbiased views. I suggest that the idea of the courts explaining the case in more detail would be more beneficial than rushing through the case. Although it may mean you only get to sit on one case during your two weeks of jury service, I believe it will make the idea of justice work more efficiently. So, to conclude I believe that although sometimes a jury may work efficiently it is not always approached in the best way. As we are all aware our society today is not perfect and neither are we. Law is a fascinating subject that compels the best of minds. The human makeup is never going to be perfect but we have to deal with what we have been given. Personally I believe the system is working, although if something does happen there are alternative methods. Just as we are changing I think that the law needs to evolve and change with us, just as for example, the death penalty became abolished. Who knows what the future may bring for law? But, one thing for sure is that with out it today's society would not be a civilized one, but an outrage beyond belief. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    Moving on to the second topic, the function of a jury. Here I propose to briefly outline its function, composition and some of the advantages and disadvantages of the jury system. The function of a jury is to weigh up the evidence in a trial and to decide what actually happened.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Smith got into an argument and killed someone. Raised 3 defences: - 1. Provocation 2. Diminished responsibility 3. Self defence He was convicted of murder and appealed to the COA and then HOL who said, "His clinical depression which may have reduced his level of control should have been put to the jury" Cumulative provocation - Battered wife

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    CHAPTER 3 REASONABLE MAN IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT. The concept of reasonableness has been vastly used in tort cases that have come before Indian judiciary. However the concept of reasonable man as it is has not been used extensively in the supreme court of India. The reason why this reasonable man who is very popular with the English

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    unwary "deadly poison" within a "sweet apple," analogizes the Prophet to the ultimate instigator of the heresy of Islam: Satan. Often, the link between Christianity's arch-heresiarch, its first and chief pervert, and Muhammad is asserted more baldly. For Peter the Venerable, Muhammad is simply "this Satan," one who advanced all

  1. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    The mentally ill are excused for obvious reasons, they wouldn't be able to cope with the trial as much as a normal person, and they're verdict wouldn't be reliable because they wouldn't have understood most of the trial. People who have a religious vocation would be excused because they are

  2. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    The doctrine of Re Rose is concerned with whether a purported gift at law which is ineffective can nevertheless take effect as a gift of equity. Recently the case of Pagarani18 brought up the same point of law, also concerning shares.

  1. Common Law and Equity

    Common Law only gave one type of remedy and this was damages. This meant that if something was damaged or hurt then the complainant would receive compensation, this meant that they would be given money to make up for the damage that was caused.

  2. Lay People

    A person may be disqualified from becoming a magistrate if they have any serious criminal convictions, if they are bankrupt or are members of the armed forces or police. The idea of the selection process is to create a panel representative of all sections of society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work