• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law : Juries & Judges

Extracts from this document...


Law Coursework Jury Trial within the English Legal System. The Jury system throughout England is one, which manages to give the public the chance to play a vital part in the legal system. This gives you the chance to see what is going on throughout the law and informs you what happens in court. You, as a juror will usually be involved in the more serious criminal cases such as burgluary, theft and drug offences. It would be less likely that you would be sitting in a case about murder or rape. The trial which you would attend would be seen in the Crown Court. However, sometimes a juror would be needed in a civil case, which would be heard at either the High Court or County Court. Although a jury would be less likely to be in a civil case than a criminal case. The usual amount of people on a dury is 12, usually there will be a cross-section of the society in order to get a fair and unbiased trial. Your aim as a jury would be to consider the evidence and then reach a verdict of 'guilty' or 'not guilty.' In order to be able to become a juror you have to have some certain qualities, such as: * Between 18 and 70 years of age. * On the electoral register to vote. * Lived in the UK, Channel Islands or Isle of Man for at least 5 years since the age of 13. ...read more.


He/She even may give a brief overview of the law involved. The 12 of you then proceed to the jury room, where you discuss your verdict. The usher escorts you to the jury room, where by considering all the evidence you reach a verdict. You then would have been given an indictment, which is a list of offences the defendant is charged with. After the verdict has been reached you would then be asked, if you are the foremen, the verdict by the clerk. Once you have given your decision your work would have been completed. If you found the defendant guilty the judge may have sentence him/her then or could have asked for pre-sentencing reports to be written the probation service. The defendant would then attend court at a later date. Once this is completed you would then be escorted once again by the usher to the Jury Assemble Area. You also would be expected to report back to the court officials after a trial, as you could be part of another jury within your two-week service. Now I have mentioned the way in which the jury service operates, do you think it works? How efficient is the service? Does it really help the community? Is it just too inconvenient? Well, this is the next part of my coursework. I will explain the advantages, but as you know, with many advantages comes many disadvantages, however I will also express my opinions and some other people opinions towards this system. ...read more.


Whilst this cuts down the public involvement is also cuts down on costs, although most of the disadvantages I have mentioned about a jury would still apply. So, what is your method? I believe that by deciding upon a method which contains a judge to look over the case would be an efficient way of operating, whilst having a jury to make up their mind as this would ensure the idea of unbiased views. I suggest that the idea of the courts explaining the case in more detail would be more beneficial than rushing through the case. Although it may mean you only get to sit on one case during your two weeks of jury service, I believe it will make the idea of justice work more efficiently. So, to conclude I believe that although sometimes a jury may work efficiently it is not always approached in the best way. As we are all aware our society today is not perfect and neither are we. Law is a fascinating subject that compels the best of minds. The human makeup is never going to be perfect but we have to deal with what we have been given. Personally I believe the system is working, although if something does happen there are alternative methods. Just as we are changing I think that the law needs to evolve and change with us, just as for example, the death penalty became abolished. Who knows what the future may bring for law? But, one thing for sure is that with out it today's society would not be a civilized one, but an outrage beyond belief. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    Auld said on eligibility. The only qualification required for jury service in England and Wales, apart from age and ordinary residence in this country, is entry on the electoral roll. The nature of this record results in under-representation of those in their early 20s, ethnic minorities and the more mobile sections of the community, such as those living in rented accommodation3.

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    between the concept of reasonable man in torts and the concept of reasonable man in administrative law. In the arguments there was some general misapprehension of the scope of the "rea-sonableness"-test in administrative law. By whose standards of reasonableness that a matter is to be decided?

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    COA rejected appeal. R v Baille (1995) - The provocative action was directed at his son. Baille went after a drug dealer who had threatened his son. He drove to the victims house which was about 30 minutes away and then chased the victim for about 15 minutes before catching him.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    can even amend or repeal Acts of Parliament. Third, and perhaps most important, parliament is no longer free to legislate without restriction in areas governed by Community law. An Act of Parliament incompatible with any requirement of European law can and must be declared invalid and ineffective to the extent of that incompatibility.

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    Again the court affirmed the pre Human Rights Act of a successful claim in breach of confidence: (a) that the information is confidential (b) there was an obligation of confidence (c) that the publication of the information was detriment to the claimant.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The possession by the payer of a receipt for payment is no. substitute for the surrender of the instrument. 2. Debtor as Holder: When the primary party lawfully becomes the holder of the instrument in his own right at or after maturity, the instrument is discharged.

  1. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    Interview people suspected of criminal offences to discover the truth 2. Interview and record statements from witnesses and victims of occurrences to discover the truth 3. Processing persons through the custody office by documentation, fingerprinting and photographing. 4. Identification of persons committing criminal offences, traffic offences and breaches of the

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    companies just like CropDesign around the world, and having one of these (-15-) Bradley & Quirk other companies file a patent application before them it could cost the business possibly hundreds of thousands of dollars and the individual writing the report his/her job.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work