• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the ways a criminal case is conducted.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the ways a criminal case is conducted. When a case is being investigated the police have to get advice from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). This is to avoid cases being brought unnecessarily to court. The CPS also review all cases passed to them and find out if there is sufficient evidence to continue. This avoids weak cases being taken to court. Additionally the CPS are responsible for cases once they have been passed to them. They conduct the prosecution of cases in the Magistrates Court and conduct cases in the Crown Courts. The CPS have to carry out two tests before deciding whether a case should continue and go to court. The first is the Evidential Test. This test's how reliable and strong the evidence for each case is and how likely the jury are to convict. The other test is the Public Interest Test. This covers reasons for and against prosecution and depends on each case. ...read more.

Middle

They also take an initial look at evidence in triable either way offences, deal with the first hearing of indictable offences, work with all side matters connected with criminal cases and try cases in the youth court. In triable either way offences when a defendant pleads not guilty they can choose trial by jury in a Crown Court. Less than one in twenty choose this even though the decision of guilt or innocence is made by the jury which gives a better chance of acquittal. There are many reasons for and against the right to choose trial by jury. Some of the reasons against are that it takes much longer before the trial, it is more expensive and there is time wasted because many defendants choose trial by jury but then plead guilty. Two Bills were introduced into Parliament to get rid of this right however they were voted against both times by the House of Lords. ...read more.

Conclusion

If they don't directions are given to organise the actual trial. At the trial the defendant is normally represented by a barrister, but they can also represent themselves. During the trial the prosecution make an opening speech about what the case is and what they intend to prove. They bring out witnesses who give evidence and are cross-examined by the defence. The defence then make their opening speech, but only if they intend to call evidence other than the defendant. Defence witnesses then give evidence and are cross-examined by the prosecution. The defence and prosecution then make closing speeches followed by the judges summary. Once the jury have made their decision it is announced in open court. If they announce the defendant is guilty they are charged, if they announce not guilty they are discharged. When a defendant has been charged they are able to appeal against a conviction and/or sentence to the Court of Appeal. Law Maria Fisher ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    COA rejected appeal. R v Baille (1995) - The provocative action was directed at his son. Baille went after a drug dealer who had threatened his son. He drove to the victims house which was about 30 minutes away and then chased the victim for about 15 minutes before catching him.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    or unable (in which case he may be sent to a mental hospital until, if ever, he is fit to stand trial). If the defendant pleads not guilty the judge (with help from both sides) tries to identify > Which alleged facts are admitted and which are denied; > Whether

  1. Pre Trial Procedure in Criminal Cases

    9.2.3 Amendments to Bail Act 1976 * In 80's + 90's worry that dangerous criminals being released on bail and committing further crimes. * First ked to passing of sec 153 of criminal justice act 1988 which amended bail act so that court is required to give reason if granting bail for murder, manslaughter or rape.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    website has a job to do, to report on a story or an issue of interest. In order to carry out a report the reporter must gain facts and opinions from both sides, they do this by interviewing people and asking them questions, this ensures that facts and opinions from both sides can be given.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Act, 1988, which came into force on April 1, 1989. Apart from few minor amendments, the major amendment pertains to insertion of a new, Chapter (Chapter XVII) in the Negotiable Instruments Act, whose heading is "Penalties in case of Dishonor of certain Checks for Insufficiency of Funds in the Accounts".

  2. The criminal process

    are there more 'public' factors favouring a prosecution than opposing it. When deciding whether to continue with the prosecution in the public's interest the CPS take into account the seriousness of the offence and the circumstances of the offender and decide on balance whether a prosecution would be the best option or whether another course of action should be followed.

  1. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    Juvenile offender rates have decreased from 1996/97 to 2003/04 from 3965 to 3023 per 100 000 per year. It then increased in 2005/06 and increased again in 2006/07 to 3532. However, the adult offender rate peaked in 2000/01 at 2100 per 100 000, in 2006/07 it was 1492 per 100 000 the lowest rate recorded.

  2. The case R.V Machekequonabe, a pagan Indian prisoner.

    but when his challenges were not answered, Machekequonabe and his partner gave chase and shot what Machekequonabe was justified in believing was a wendigo. As wendigos are visually indistinguishable from humans, the only method of identification would have been calling out and receiving and answer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work