• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Supreme Court Case Study - R. v. Latimer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Supreme Court Case Assignment (R. v. Latimer) Abhit Sahota 18/10/2012 CLU3M1-01 Part 1: Case Citation R. v. Latimer (2001) SCC 1 S.C.R. 3 Criminal or Civil Case? Criminal R Regina (Crown) v. ?versus? Defendant Latimer Year 2001 Court Supreme Court of Canada Volume Number 1 Edition - Page Number 3 Part 2: Case Synopsis This was a controversial case that concerned the issue of a mercy killing or assisted suicide. The decision of the case would ignite an ethical battle across Canada due to it?s sensitive nature. Robert Latimer, Saskatchewan resident was convicted of murdering his disabled daughter, Tracy Latimer. The 12 year old girl was diagnosed with cerebral palsy from birth, and had severe physical and mental disabilities. ...read more.

Middle

The appeal had been filed to argue that they had not legally arrested him, but the court ordered a new trial after information about the authorities questioning and picking the jury members based upon their moral standpoints with controversial issues. The second trial at the SCC was concerned with if Mr. Latimer?s sentence was cruel and unusual and a breach of section 12 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The court ruled that his sentence of 10 year minimum sentence was not cruel and unusual. The Crown pointed out that Mr. Latimer?s actions were planned, and he did not regret them. Part 3: Significance of the Judgement Why did the Supreme Court hear this particular case? R. v. Latimer more or less an ethical debate on if mercy killings can be justified. ...read more.

Conclusion

Did the Supreme Court set a precedent? Explain. Yes, the Supreme Court set a precedent on the sentence of mercy killings. There was support for Robert Latimer to receive a more lenient sentence, however the court still treated the case as a second degree murder as it was planned, and the defendant had no regret of his action. Robert Latimer received the minimum 10 year penalty for a second degree murder as he acted out of compassion.\ Other Comments According, to a report in 1999 73% of Canadians felt that Robert Latimer acted out of compassion for his daughter, and 41% believe that mercy killings should not be against the law. All 9 Supreme Court judges were on this case and voted unanimously for the 10 year sentence was not a cruel or unusual punishment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law of Evidence - R v Kearley

    5 star(s)

    His Lordship went further and suggested that 'the fact that there were a number of people seeking to buy drugs was legally relevant and admissible as showing that there was a market to which the accused could sell'5. Finally an interesting point made by Lord Browne-Wilkinson is that any human

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    However, judges tend to follow the decisions of other High Court Judges on the basis of judicial co-operation and certainty where a judge in the High Court is confronted by conflicting decisions of the Court of Appeal, the later of which had bee n fully considered (i.e.

  1. The Supreme Court of Canada and the Charter: Democratic or Anti-Democratic?

    In order to be called a democratic country, every person within Canada should have equal rights; however, in many cases, this is not portrayed through the Canadian judicial system. Firstly, although the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been set out in order to give each and every citizen

  2. Euthanasia In Canada

    Allowing death to occur when the patient specifically refuses further therapy is to acknowledge the natural limit of autonomy. This does not extend to refusal of basic care and does not mean the withdrawal of comfort measures. In 1991, the BC Royal Commission concluded that "the person who is dying

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Subsequently, the accounts became badly overdrawn, and the bank dishonored a number of their checks. The Kendalls brought suit against United California Bank, charging that wrongful dishonor of checks that the bank had originally agreed to accept as overdrafts damaged the Kendalls' personal reputation and their credit rating.

  2. prisoners rights

    to be insured by the trial court before ordering for further remand. The mental agony, expense and strain which a person proceeded against in criminal law has to undergo and which, coupled with delay, may result in impairing the capability or ability of the accused to defend himself have persuaded

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    The prosecuting barrister then outlines the prosecution's case and calls witnesses. Each witness is examined "in chief" by the prosecutor, cross-examined by the defence, and re-examined if necessary to clear up any ambiguities: the judge may also ask relevant questions of his own, but must not adopt the role of an advocate.

  2. Legal proceedings are a seminal example of a cultural performance. For this case study ...

    For example, the judge is referred to as "Your Honor" and "The Court"; attorneys are referred to as "learned counsel," "opposing counsel," "learned colleague"; the bailiff as "court security officer"; police officers by their respective rank; jury members as "Ladies and Gentlemen."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work