• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The law is impartial and exists to protect the rights of individuals and society without favour or prejudice." - To what extent do you agree with this opinion?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Law. "The law is impartial and exists to protect the rights of individuals and society without favour or prejudice." - To what extent do you agree with this opinion? Our world is far from perfect, everyday more and more crimes occur - robberies, muggings, rape, assaults and sometimes even murder. There is no doubt that some sort of control is necessary, any society or group of people has its own set of rules in order to control the behaviour of individuals. These rules are rules which define what is right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable. Laws exist to promote social order, establish justice, protect property rights, establish moral standards and give legal status to authorities. Laws are primarily to keep people safe and make our society a better place to be in, but do they always fulfil this function? Does it really provide protection for individuals? Does it protect the rights of individuals and societies? ...read more.

Middle

However, not all laws are entirely for the benefit of the working class. It is obvious that many laws are there to protect everyone, laws concerning stealing, assault etc. For a legal system to be effective, any law must have the majority support of the population, otherwise they would have no use. If this statement is to be believed, then law must be for the protection and rights in society and people must agree with it surely? Another argument would be that law is pointless, as it is not always obeyed by numerous individuals. Although, it is impossible to control the actions of every person on our planet and no method could be 100% successful in preventing crime. Respect for the law will exist if it is regarded as reasonable. If a law is thought unreasonable, pressure for change will develop. Law is usually a compromise between different views and is often open to interpretation. ...read more.

Conclusion

As with everything, the law will improve over time and become more and more efficient, the law will change according to opinions and attitudes of our population. Pressures for change can come in various ways: - New knowledge may make changes possible or necessary. - It may come from changing attitudes and values. - People may campaign about laws that they do not agree with. - Events may cause a panic amongst the public and therefore society would demand new laws. - Campaigns may be supported or encouraged by media. - Structure of society may change over time and make new laws necessary. - Changes in opinions or attitudes of other countries reported in the media may affect our laws. - Dominant groups, particularly political parties that have an agenda for change may come into power and enforce these changes. Over time, as more and more changes are made our law and justice system should gradually improve and eventually be as effective as possible in protecting the rights of individuals and society without favour or prejudice. Kerry Phillips. 01/10/04. 12.9. General Studies. 1 Mrs Carr. The Law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    It has to be noted that unlike the English cases, though the concept of reasonable man has made an appearance to explain or

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    Learned men promoted this view, and some apparently recognized at the same time that it was a falsification, as is the case with Peter the Venerable. Peter, who wrote his Summa totius haeresis Saracenorum for the purpose of acquainting Europeans with Islam so that they might resist it, opens his

  1. Our Day Out and social deprivation.

    He is a traditional teacher of the "old school", with rigorous views of discipline, standards, uniform, appropriate behaviour and hard work. He is not used to dealing with pupils in the Progress Class and does not really know how to cope with them.

  2. Lay People

    However, the 15 mile rule doesn't help if not enough ethnic people want to become magistrates. Only about 6% of all Lay Magistrates are from an ethnic background and 94% from a white middle-aged background according to a census of lay magistrates in 2002.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    the Government to exercise the functions of a Notary Public as laid down in the Negotiable Instruments Act. (Noting, Protest etc.). The term "Notary Public", includes the notary public of a foreign country also. Gujrat Singh v. Jaswant Singh3. Noting Where a note or bill is dishonored, the holder is

  2. Effectiveness of the law in gaining justice for society.

    in that of the "truth in sentencing" laws in the year 1989. People within society were outraged at the amount of penal servitude being sentenced and not being completed. Prisoners were only serving a small fraction of their original sentence, the community was outraged, and the legal system made changes.

  1. prisoners rights

    Giasuddin v State of A.P (1977) 3 SCC 287 because in that case reformative aspect was emphasized by stating that the State has to rehabilitate rather than to avenge. Krishna Iyer, J, pointed out that the sub-culture that leads to anti-social behaviour has to be countered not by undue cruelty but by re-culturalisation.

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    This demonstrates the courts willingness to expand existing doctrines to cover new areas, rather then develop a whole new freestanding doctrine. He also suggested that kaye v Robertson might have decided differently if it reoccurred and expressed the view that; 'English law would now protect all those who find themselves subjected to unwanted intrusion into their private lives'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work