• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Law
  • Word count: 2479

Tort Project 2003

Extracts from this document...


NAME: Vivienne Matthews O'Neill STUDENT NUMBER: 00394556 LECTURER: Ms Kathleen Moore-Walsh TITLE: The concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law, why not? WORD COUNT: DATE DUE: 5th December 2003 10 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Main theory >what is a battery >what is transferred malice >transferred malice in crime >Livingstone v Ministry of Defence >other jurisdictions opinion 3. Conclusion 4. Bibliography 10 Introduction The title of this assignment, which i propose that i shall be revisiting for the purposes of this tort project is that: "the concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law" In dealing with this topic I will inevitably be looking at what a battery is, what is transferred malice, cases in other jurisdictions which have accepted the concept of transferred malice in tort law, transferred malice in crime and why it is accepted in criminal law, and finally my arguments as to why I believe it should be adopted into our jurisdiction. In examining this topic it will be necessary to refer to case law of a number of jurisdictions such as America, Australia, the UK, Northern Ireland, and Ireland. ...read more.


to be successful so if a form of this doctrine was introduced to Irish tort law the courts could lay down similar guidelines to prevent the doctrine from being abused. One jurisdiction which has accepted the concept of transferred malice in relation to battery in tort law is Northern Ireland. In researching this project it was difficult to uncover many cases where transferred malice has been accepted so when one as close as across the border from us arose it made me question even more why we have not yet accepted the process or if we ever will. The case in which is being used to highlight that sometimes transferred malice will be accepted is Livingstone v Ministry of Defence13. In this case the plaintiff was struck and injured by a baton round fired by a soldier at a time when the security forces had cordoned off streets in the vicinity of Divis Street and Millfield in Belfast in order to prevent an unlawful procession reaching the centre of the city. It was part of the case for the defence that baton rounds were fired by the security forces after they had been attacked by rioters who threw stones and bricks and other missiles at them, this claim was not seriously disputed by the plaintiff. ...read more.


The defendant was convicted of battery on the baby. The Court held that direct can include via another person so for example setting a dog on someone can be direct force22. The concept of transferred malice could have been successfully applied here also to achieve the same outcome. CONCLUSION In concluding this argument, I would like to clearly point out that in America the concept of transferred intent /malice has been accepted and is established in the Doctrine of Transferred Intention23. I believe through the case law i have been able to locate on the issue of transferred intent /malice being used in American tort law, that it has proven to be quite successful since it has been introduced. Northern Ireland has also proven that a doctrine is quite workable and can be successfully applied in tort law24. Even though since the application of this doctrine in the Livingstone case no further progress or guidelines have been laid down by the courts in relation to this issue. England currently has no doctrine of transferred intent / malice in tort law but it has widened its view25 towards the acceptance of such a doctrine and may be accepted fully into tort law in the near future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    However, it was clear that the position would have been different if the couple had been husband and wife and the house purchased in the wife's name only. In such a case, the fraudulent motive would mean that the husband would not be allowed to enforce his interest in the property.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    for murder was direct or oblique intention. The same rule would apply fort s18 GBH. This was confirmed in R v Bryson 1985 when it was concluded that the MR. for s18 was direct intention to do GBH or oblique intention to do GBH (GBH was a virtual certainly following the defendants actions)

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    The legal standard is not that of the defendant himself but that of 'a man of ordinary prudence', 'a man using ordinary care and skill', 'a hypothetical reasonable man.' In this context lord MACMILLAN words "the standard of foresight of reasonable man...eliminates the personal equation and is independent of the idiosyncrasies of the particular person whose conduct is in question."

  2. Metafiktion er betegnelsen for den type af sknlitteratur, film og drama, som gr opmrksom ...

    128 l 20-21). Desuden er metafiktion kendetegnet ved meget intertekstualitet, der giver teksten mere dybdevirkning. (http://www.hum.uit.no/nordlit/8/gemzoe.html) ____________________________________________________________________________ Jeg har valgt at unders�ge Karen Blixens novelle "Dykkeren" som metafiktion, da jeg synes det kunne v�re sp�ndende at arbejde med en af hendes historier.

  1. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    Moore selects the video footage in a way so that the action gets more dramatic and there is more panic as Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold undergo their butchery. This manipulates the viewer into thinking that the events had an even bigger effect on people and that it caused an extreme level of fear, worry and panic.


    This case may initially seem to be a straight forward application of negligence law, however the issues it deals with reflect on issues in society. Gleeson CJ in his dissenting judgement concisely outlines this issue at 39: "... it involves treating, as actionable damage, and as a matter to be

  1. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    The Irish bombing cases may have been wrongful convictions, but the error arose from perjured or mistaken evidence rather than from the jury system. Research by Baldwin & McConville in 1979 paints a more disturbing picture: they suggest that about 5 per cent of jury convictions in Birmingham were "doubtful",

  2. For this essay we will be looking at the defence of assault and battery, ...

    The court held that the boys did not understand the nature of the act, so there was no consent. Consent is no defence to murder as no one will consent to anyone wanting to kill himself or herself. There are only a few occasions in fraud that can actually validate consent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work