• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"What are the advantages and disadvantages of electing for a Summary trial as opposed to trail by jury?"

Extracts from this document...


"What are the advantages and disadvantages of electing for a Summary trial as opposed to trail by jury?" There are many advantages to electing for a summary trial as opposed to trail by jury. One advantage of electing for a summary trial is that magistrates know more about their local area as they are members of the local community appointed by the Lord Chancellor. This means that their views could be more conclusive and would most likely consider the needs of the community and the major problems it faces. On the other hand, magistrates' courts deal with smaller incidents and magistrates may have a more 'conviction-minded' attitude as they wish to look out for their local community. ...read more.


Which can lead to the loss of jobs, wages and accommodation. Another reason for electing for a summary trial is that magistrates have lesser powers of conviction. They can impose a maximum of 6 months imprisonment and or a �5000 fine. However if you then plea or are found to be guilty and the magistrates feels his powers are not enough then he will send the defendant to the crown court for sentencing. A disadvantage of electing for a summary trial is that the conviction rate in Magistrate Courts is very high, whereas in Crown Courts the figure is more evenly balanced, with the conviction rate being about 55%. This however, is somewhat biased, as crown court cases are more serious and not many cases move on from magistrates' courts. ...read more.


The main disadvantage of choosing trail by jury is the costs involved as a barrister becomes essential as in the crown court the case is looked into in more detail than the magistrate's court. Saying this however if a case is taken to the crown court then it is more likely that the defendant will receive legal aid. It could also be said that since magistrates are "lay" meaning not legally qualified that they are not capable of coming to a fair and more importantly a just verdict. This may or may not be so but they are certainly more experienced than a juror and that fact that magistrates usually sit in threes that any biases would be cancelled out and any inexperience compensated for. This experience would defiantly be looked upon as an advantage to electing for a summary trial as opposed to trail by jury. Page 1 02/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A good answer as many valid points made, some supported with evidence. What is impressive is that the answer often makes a point then in the same paragraph makes a counter point, showing awareness of both sides of the argument.
Rating ****

Marked by teacher Nick Price 18/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury ...

    5 star(s)

    A case, that illustrates random selection providing incapable jurors, is R v Young (1995) where the Court of Appeal ordered a retrial of a man convicted of double murder because 4 of the jurors had tried to contact the victims using a Ouija board in what was described as a

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    The doctrine of judicial precedent provides for latter cases to follow the decisions of previous cases, where the material facts happen to be similar.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not ...

    4 star(s)

    (It is this area that the current government is grappling with at the moment) As these lists have grown the number of cases that are tried by a jury has fallen. The crime figures published for 1998-99 show that there were 5,254,000 offences recorded by the Police.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    had been done to the police reputation: The Phillips commission in 1981: This looked at the balance between powers for the police and safe guards for the suspects. However, by the time the report was completed a number of changes had been made in society and the importance of this case had been diminished.

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    I will split up disciple into four sections, which are regulation, obedience, restraint and conformity. Regulation in the main discipline in the royal marines, this is because there are many different strict laws and guidelines within the marines that have to be abided by and followed.

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    that we are prepared to suspend our own immediate unfavourable assessments of their reasonableness on a particular issue in the anticipation that further consideration or fuller understanding will counter first impressions. That is, although we start with the individual's immediate assessment of reasonableness, this assessment is capable of correction, thanks

  1. "Discuss the meaning and constitutional significance of the rule of law. Illustrate your answer ...

    Today the state regulates national life in multifarious ways. Dicey's second meaning stresses the equal subjection of all persons to the ordinary law. The specific meaning he attached to equality before the law was that all nations were subject to the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Only in these exceptional cases should the judge give the Nedrick Direction I.e. is death or GBH a virtual certainty, if so this is evidence from which the Jury may infer intention. 4. An exact Nedrick Direction is not required in instances where there is more than 1 source of evidence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work