• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Poetic language is so endlessly interpretable that in the end, any meanings are arbitrary, and any one reading as valid as another.' Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Poetic language is so endlessly interpretable that in the end, any meanings are arbitrary, and any one reading as valid as another.' Discuss. There is no denying that when an author writes a text there is more meaning in it than just the obvious plot, authors constantly litter their texts with themes, double entendre, metaphor etc. all of which can be easily missed by the reader. If one reader was to miss many of these techniques but another was to pickup on most, then surely the latter would have understood the work better, and in the way it was intended, and therefore their interpretation is the more valid of the two. However we could argue that the text was written badly, because certain readers cannot understand it in the way it was intended. All this is just a small part of one of the biggest debates in modern literature and criticism, and that is whether or not it is necessary to know the history and context behind a book to fully understand it. It used to be that a critic would say that the best way to understand a work is to understand each individual author, and the circumstances behind their text, today however the general feeling is that it is best not to cloud the readers judgement with all the facts behind a text. Critics would today say that the best way to read a text is to ignore everything that goes with it and just concentrate on what you, the reader, picks up from it. ...read more.

Middle

Like every theory though there is always another side to the argument and this is where Stanley Fish's idea that each reader belongs to a 'community of readers' comes in. There is still the idea that the reader relates to the text with their personal experience, and I do not think that many people would dispute that idea, but what Fish says is that the personal side to it is much more generalised. It is more to do with your background and your education, someone from England would interpret a book differently than someone from Africa because their backgrounds are completely different. The third explanation that is given is Wolfgang Iser's view, which is the one I relate to the most. His theory is that the reader's imagination is what produces the interpretation. If there is a point in the text which is not fully explained then we, the reader, are left to work it out for ourselves, for example in King Lear when Cordillia tells her father that she loves him 'according' to her 'bond', the reader is left wondering why she did that and not just make something up to rival her sisters' answers; was it because she is stubborn or perhaps for moral reasons? The answer that the reader comes up with is their imagination filling in the gap. As Iser said the reader 'is drawn into the events and made to supply what is meant from what is not said' (Iser 1995, 24). This is particularly relevant when it comes to explaining interpretation because it is 'what is not said' in a text that gets the reader ...read more.

Conclusion

However, after exploring the topic I have found a few doubts. Although they come to expect it, is it really fair to take an authors text that they have probably been working on for a matter of years and completely change the meaning of it? Surely what they write is personal to them, not necessarily as an experience they have had but more that they have devoted so much time to their work to a standard that they see as perfection. They then introduce it to the public and a critic misinterprets it and gives it a bad review because they did not like their own translation of what was written. These doubts I have are not strong enough to change my mind, but they are there and should not be ignored. In closing I do believe that everybody is entitled to their own opinion, and literary criticism is exactly that, opinions. There is no way to write a text and ensure that every reader interprets it in the way it was intended. Authors are very interested to learn about different interpretations of their works and I think that it is this acceptance and acknowledgement from them that not proves but should persuade people that any interpretation of any work is a valid one. I will finish with a quote from an interpretation of Miller's The Critic as Host that sums up what I believe to be the answer to whether all interpretations are valid or not: 'The root of idea is the word for image. To imagine is to image. All figures are not what they figure. Univocality is impossible. Everything always means something else.'(Lye,http://www.brocku.ca/english). Word Count: 2710 1 Student Number: 01504325 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Narrative section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Narrative essays

  1. Film review - Grease 2. Expectations and overcoming barriers. Stephanie goes into the world ...

    fear that she will be shunned from her group if she does so. Johnny, Zinonie's ex boyfriend who is still hung up on her doesn't seem to want accept the fact that he and Stephanie had ended the relationship and this is what made him trapped in the world of

  2. Nick Hornby is the author of both novels Fever Pitch and About a Boy. ...

    This is a negative representation of "Lad Culture" because it shows men wanting to be lonely all their life.

  1. Explain how the director presents the James Bond genre in the cinematic trailers for ...

    white belt that holds a knife and a bikini which leaves nothing to the imagination! However Jinx is portrayed than more than just a sex object; in trailer 2 and 3 she is seen wearing an army jacket. This not only gives a fuller image of who she is but

  2. James Bond - Bond(TM)s female characters are fully liberated women. They use Bond. Consider ...

    The connotations of gold are things like precious and artistically-pleasing and this could be a metaphorical symbol for women, as the girl is motionless and very passive so she does appear to be something to be looked at and appreciated visually.

  1. Case study of Two Films

    and the well known series Spaced. Throughout the years he had developed a friendship with actors Simon Pegg and Nick Frost. He directed his first movie spoof in the shape of Shaun of the Dead, a highly successful horror parody which featured this acting combination.

  2. Analysing Psyhco: the pleasure of fear(TM). How does Hitchcock build tension and create suspense ...

    When she enters the shower, she goes in there to be cleansed of her guilt because she had recently decided to take the money she had stolen back. When she undresses to get into the shower we only see her legs as respect to the actress, Janet Leigh, but the

  1. James bond review

    In one scene outside of a hotel, he uses a car to his advantage. While outside, he is bent down tying his shoes when someone mistakes him for a chauffeur and orders him to park his land rover discovery. Bond says "Certainly sir, sorry sir" and parks it perfectly, but

  2. Compare the ways in which Pride & Prejudice has been adapted for the screen, ...

    Lighting also varies considerably in the two adaptations. In the Bollywood adaptation top lighting is used to brighten the room and give a party atmosphere, this changes in the scene with Darcy and Lalita on the balcony however and backlighting is mainly used. As the BBC adaptation is a period drama lighting is not as bright as the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work