• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A) Explain what the phrase Parliamentary Supremacy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The principle of this essay is to explain the term parliamentary supremacy and whether it is accurate to articulate that parliament is really supreme. Parliament Supremacy is one of the three principles which are essential to the Constitution .The Constitution is a set of unwritten rules that determine the country's' nature and power of the state constitution based on the Golden Principle "one is free to do anything as long as it is not prohibited". Other wise referred to as "parliamentary sovereignty", parliamentary supremacy is a proposal put forward by Dicey which stands for the parliament as being supreme and immensely superior law making body in the country. Not only can it make the law but it has the power to eliminate and discard any laws. As a quote referred by Blackstone states "What parliament doth no power on earth can undo" Blackstone clearly stated no matter how powerful another individual or a group (such as a political party like the conservatives) ...read more.

Middle

In The Human Rights Act 1998 Section nineteen refers that when a new legislation is made a government minister makes a statement before the second reading , in section ten of the act it also allows the minister of the crown to amend by orders of any act which has found in courts to be incompatible. These parts of the act further enforce why parliament is still supreme, because only parliament can respond to the various new legislations by altering them or revoking them due to its incompatibility. There are various arguments against the justification for parliament being supreme .firstly the house of commons effectively dictates what status are passes, and it is only controlled by the majority of seats so parliament as a whole is only controlled by the majority of seats which is not really valid .it is said it should be rephrased as "the supremacy of the political party controlled by the party that hold the most seats." ...read more.

Conclusion

The court of appeal were told to suspend the act they responded that British courts could not tamper with an act, suspend it or declare it to be valid as only parliament could do that. However the ECJ enforced that the parliament can change it and that it will. This followed by and outcry by the judges, this was astounding due to the fact that some one other than parliament tampered with an act and suspended it. Parliamentary supremacy was now referred to as dead and what we have now is European law. Due to this evidence and various examples, yes parliament is still supreme to an extent as for the Human Rights ACT 1998 as parliament can still pass law however it clearly shows from the case of Factortame its illustrates that in a case of Uk law and EU law, EU law will triumph, although this only concerns certain laws governed by the EU legislations otherwise in other matters parliament will prevail. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. PUBLIC LAW

    The Crown places great emphasis on the UK's constitution and this is how the second branch flourished - the Executive. The Crown is the main executive body and consists of the armed forces, civil servant and ministers are all servants of the Crown.

  2. To what extent is Parliament supreme?

    What the claimant really want's is their conviction overturned, and perhaps a change in the rules so that others can have fair trials. If the court found that a domestic statute contained a provision that amounted to a breach of the Convention , the Human Rights Act says that a judge may point out the conflict.

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    Due to the American Revolution the country was deeply in debt, as a way of addressing this, Pitt proposed a new tax regime to wipe out debt. In 1786, he introduced a sinking fund with a new principle of raising the price of stock by introducing taxes.

  2. Public Law

    In a democracy, due to majoritarian rule, the government may be insensitive to the individual rights of the minorities, by no fault of its own. However, judicial review gives the minorities an opportunity to ensure their rights are upheld by the government, maintaining the Diceyan principle of 'equality under the law'.

  1. Political accountability -Parliament and the courts

    Another Parliamentary procedure used to make ministers answerable for their actions are parliamentary debates. The majority of the debates in the chambers of each House of Parliament are concerned with legislation. However, much time is also spent seeking to call government to account for actions already taken or to induce the government to take action.

  2. Public Law

    Furthermore, if a conflict is found in a piece of domestic legislation then the method of finding a resolution is in the Government's hands. When a conflict occurs, the courts are to try and find a logical solution to try and 'twist' words and are to ask the Government for assistance in order to find a solution6.

  1. Politics and Parliament - What's it all about?

    can cope with the problems posed by the power of the executive. One dimension of that struggle is the debate about specialization. How far do Members of Parliament need to specialize in order to cope with the demands of business?

  2. Source based work on Conservative Supremacy - around 1891.

    This shows that the main difference is due to predisposition as Winstanley is produces as thesis inclined towards the conservatives accomplishment being due to the conservatives while Blewet provides an antithesis to this argument asserting that the achievements were caused by liberal debility and naivety.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work