• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Account for the Liberal landslide in the 1906 General Election

Extracts from this document...


Account for the Liberal landslide in the 1906 General Election In the 1906 general election the Liberals gained 377 (plus 22 Lib-Lab) seats, the Conservative Unionists gained 157 (132 were Tariff Reformers), Labour Representation Committee gained 29 and the Irish Nationalists gained 83 seats. This even know was the biggest defeat a Conservative Party has suffered (they lost by 220 seats.) What made this defeat even more noticeable was the fact that they had won 245 less seats than in 1900 and even the former Prime Minister, Arthur Balfour, lost his seat. These facts start to ask another question, was it more a great victory for the Liberals or a humiliating defeat for the Conservatives. There is a lot of evidence to suggest it was a humiliating defeat for the Conservatives. The Conservatives had been in power for the last two decades and so did people just wanted a change? Was it the fact that the Conservative Party had been split over Tariff reform? Or was it the fact that the public felt lied to over the Boer war? ...read more.


Free Trade was something the whole party seemed agree on and help rectify the split in the party caused by Irish home Rule. The Liberals made the Conservatives look distant from what the average working person in Briton at that time wanted and it seemed the Tory party wanted the rich to become richer and the working classes to become poorer. Whereas Free Trade that the Liberals where pushing kept thing's the same and people at the time where happy with the way the country was going although they may not have realised that the imports where increasing and exports where decreasing. Tariff Reform may have been a major reason for the demise of the Conservatives but the where over reasons for their demise such as their unpopularity. This unpopularity was mainly caused by the four following points. By the time of the 1904 general election the Boer War had been over for two years but four years earlier in the 1900 general elections the conservative government claimed it was very close to success. ...read more.


Many nonconformists refused to pay the rates. In 1903 a secret electoral pact was created between the Liberals and the LRC. The LRC agreed not to put candidates against Liberal candidates. This meant that the anti-Unionist would not be split and that the Liberal party would have access to �100,000 pounds of the LRC electoral funds which was much needed at the time as funds where running short in the Liberal Party. I conclude that the Tory Party must have being expecting defeat due to the amount of mistakes they had made. Political trickery which lead the public to lose confidence and not trust the government also due to pendulum politics it was time for a change (people get bored with governments and look for a change). These are not the main reasons why the government would have been expecting defeat, the separation in to two groups left the party with no real policies. So in my opinion the Liberals where just in the right place at the right time and it was conservative mistakes such as losing most of the working class vote and situations which lead to there humiliating defeat and not a Liberal landslide. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Although it was hoped that Dalton's resignation might offset some of the decline in public confidence in Labour's economic policy, the government were never again endorsed by mass popularity as in the previous two years.

  2. Account for the overwhelming Liberal Landslide in the 1906 General Election.

    The British electoral system is grossly un-democratic and its make-up and liberal tactics helped to accentuate the inequalities in the system. There was a desire for fresh ideas in the country, it is a political reality that after a sustained period of government by one party the nation sees them

  1. "Conservative success in the years before 1906 was due more too liberal weaknesses than ...

    The results of the 1886 election were due to both the growing popularity of the conservative party and the split in the Liberal Unionist party, which had caused financial problems for them. They then found it hard to employ candidates as they had no money to pay wages meaning the candidates would have to be wealthy.

  2. Liberal success in 1906 owed more to conservative failure than liberal organization, To what ...

    Britain had gone to war with South Africa over who would control the country. The British, or the Boers, who were farmers. From the beginning many of the British public were deeply unhappy with the war and thought that British methods were immoral.

  1. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    not new to the Tory government; "the new men did not regard their position as an opportunity to challenge government philosophy"-Evans. The argument that "much of the groundwork for the reforms, adjustments and improvements had been put through in train by their allegedly reactionary predecessors and by themselves as subordinates.

  2. The Liberal election victory of 1906 was a result of division in the conservative ...

    century and eventually a free trade policy had been adopted, basically countries could trade freely without the disincentive of government taxes.

  1. Given Churchill’s popularity in the war, why did he lose the 1945 election?

    The Labour party offered two convincing programmes, whereas the Tories offered the same but gave the impression they did not believe it. Both parties accepted Keynesianism, an economic system that bridged capitalism and socialism, arguing for full employment brought about by government intervention in the economy.

  2. Geopolitical consequences of the demise of the Soviet Union

    At the economic level, the development of the oil industry of these countries means investment opportunities for the American construction and oil companies. Politically, the United States will be in a position to control these new important energy resources and diversify its own sources supply.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work