• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

American politics in the early part of the 1800’s, housed two political parties; the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federali

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Gregg Klein American politics in the early part of the 1800s housed two political parties: the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The former were made up of politicians and common people who believed that government should be run using a strict interpretation of the words within the Constitution, and thereby limiting the powers of the central government. On the other hand, the Federalists took a more liberal view, allowing for ample room in the interpretation of the Constitution and the maintenance of a strong federal government. During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, however, it is seen that these two publicly Jeffersonian republicans acted in ways that makes one doubt that their commitment to their political party's stated ideals was absolutely unconditional. Document A surely supports the claim that Jefferson often held true to Republican beliefs. In an 1800 letter to Gideon Granger, the President reasons that one centralized government could never adequately support the future of the United States. "Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government." ...read more.

Middle

trade. This Act went against the Jeffersonian view of keeping open overseas commerce. Document C illustrates how the Act annoyed the British and stunted overseas trade with them. This gives rise to the idea that Jefferson was not quite as much of a Jeffersonian Republican as most may have thought. Document G refers to another instance of Jefferson deviating from the strict constructionist view. In this 1816 letter to S. Kercehval, the then-former President explains how he thinks that, along with time and a changing culture, the Constitution needs to be a living body that can change and adapt to different times. "...I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions....But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind." This goes against the bases of the Jeffersonians, since his words say essentially that the Constitution should not be interpreted too narrowly. During his term in office, Madison faced the decision of whether or not to introduce a draft for the War of 1812 against England. ...read more.

Conclusion

Here, the President vetoes a bill that would have the government fund construction of national roads and water transportation. Madison does agree that it is important to build these routes - "I am not unaware of the great importance of roads and canals and the improved navigation of water courses...." However, he even more strongly feels that it is not within the central government's authority (as stated by the Constitution) to undertake the action. "...such a power is not expressly given by the Constitution..." Since Madison stuck to the strict limits of the Constitution, he was surely thinking here as a true Jeffersonian Republican. Both Presidents Jefferson and Madison were leaders of the Jeffersonian Republicans, a group of politicians that viewed the Constitution as an uncompromising document giving very distinctly defined powers to the government. As indicated above, at times these men did act as true Jeffersonians, while though at other times they behaved a bit more like Federalists. Perhaps they felt that, in the end, no document is perfect and that their sound practical judgments would have to occasionally substitute for a blind belief in an ideal. Perhaps this also helped to make them effective Presidents. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    Pedepsirea "ereticilor" nu se mai facea pe esafoade ci prin judecata sau neghiobia fiecaruia dintre indivizii care respingeau presupusul adevar, oblig´┐Żnd astfel persoana care emitea acea parere sa o renege, sau sa o pastreze doar pentru sine. Multi dintre intelctualii care pot avea pareri neconforme cu anumite standarde admise de

  2. What is Politics

    Public order is necessary to create a stable society in which art, science and commerce can flourish. However, some degree of disorder is also necessary to allow progress. Absolute order implies no disagreement. Without disagreement ideas are not challenged and there is no progress.

  1. Ben Hanson - Politics - Mr

    On the one hand they have made parliament more effective by giving backbenchers the means to scrutinise government in a systematic way, but on the other hand the make up of the committees still stays the same (the governing power having most MPs and so on,)

  2. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    West Windsor Residence Association * Mass - Extensive active members across the country * Ideological - Labour and Clause 4, have to follow socialist beliefs * Pragmatic - Tony Ditching Clause 4 and the Conservative parties Philosophy Difference Between a Political Party and a Pressure Group- * Parties- Seek power

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    It is interesting to note that even the right wing parties such as the Jamaat-e-Islam opposed this since it fell short of their ideal which was to make Bangladesh into an Islamic Republic. It may be asked why over the last three decades there was a volte face in the 'secular' politics of Bangladesh.

  2. Political parties and representation

    it's likely that the winning candidate would only have a small share of the vote - creating a real legitimacy problem in single-member constituency systems (and making 'list' systems of PR impossible. (c) A legislature with no parties would be almost impossible for the government to manage, except by coercion

  1. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    Argentina has often been ranked alongside the likes of China, Botswana and Colombia as one of the most corrupt countries in the world, a Global Competitiveness Report published four years ago saw Argentina listed as having one of the worst records for independence of the judiciary.

  2. Russia - political past, present and future

    To increase security, United States joined with a several other countries to create a North Atlantic Treaty Organization, while the Soviet Union took a step to form the Warsaw Mutual Defense Pact. Russia in cooperation with Cuba set a number of Missiles that were directed towards the states, while the United States were actively developing military bases in Turkey.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work