• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Apartheid - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


History Assignment Two, Objective Three, Apartheid. A). From source A we can learn about Apartheid, the national party's policy, that they were against integration and thought that it would lead to national suicide by the whites 'integration, would in the long run amount to national suicide by the whites' or by the system of Apartheid separate the races into allocated land. This was, in their eyes believe to be of benefit to all races ' Apartheid, which will safeguard the future of every race.' Primarily to protect the white race and raise them to supremacy. ' The fundamental guiding principle of the national party's policy is the preservation and safeguarding of the white race.' People or churches that oppose the system will not be tolerated as said in the source. They wanted 'school and social services' for blacks to be in their own 'reserves' these were the areas of land allocated to the Blacks and were usually run-down, bare, arid, and poor lands. They also wanted to seclude them from urban areas 'Blacks in urban areas should be regarded as migrants and not entitled to political or social rights.' ...read more.


Source G is particularly useful as it gives us an indication of how education and the standard of education were in this time; around the time of the Bantu education act was passed. So it was not only a case of giving one pupil more than the other it was how much was given to the entire school as all students were separated because of other laws and acts commonly known as 'petty apartheid.' The source tells us that, at first glance, the white pupils generally received more than any other pupil from another race. 'Annual average spending on school pupils per head, White - �63.92, Black - �8.99.' This tells us that all people weather Black or White; were entitled to an education it also tells us that the Whites were held in the highest regard - therefore received a better education, and Blacks the lowest - therefore received a lower standard of education. This would not be caused by not allowing Black schools to have a high standard of education but simply not giving them enough money to be able to have good schools. ...read more.


My personal opinion however agrees with source K in that it was both, unworkable and harmful to South Africa and its people. After all the government had been through to establish Apartheid the country was ridiculed when they failed to convict any one of 156 men and women in the Treason Trial! Also in Sharpeville where 67 people were killed and many more injured! As stated in 'Encyclopedia Britannica yearbook 1960' this also embarrassed the country and government. Apartheid was unworkable as it is human instinct to protect what life you have or for a better life which was the case for many people and why movements like the PAC and ANC were founded. As shown in source J Apartheid also did not have the support of all other countries of the world and their views seemed very similar to that of the Nazi's. When the AWB came along, an ultra right-winged organization 'Afrikaner Resistance Movement' around the end of the term of Dr Verwoerd they refused to integrate with the native Africans or anyone non-white. They attacked sometimes killing black people to try to prevent the fall of the system of Apartheid. All this concludes that apartheid was harmful and unworkable to South Africa! -MazZ- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    3) Apartheid implied eradication at different times for different people. For some it could have been when sanctions were stopped, or when Mandela and his fellow prisoners were let out of prison or when segregation laws were repealed or when fully democratic elections were held in South Africa.

  2. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    He unbanned the ANC, the PAC, the Communist Party and 30 other organisations; he freed political prisoners and suspended the death sentence. Nine days after this, he released Nelson Mandela from prison without conditions. From May 1990 to April 1994, apartheid fell.

  1. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    the two wars in which Japan was engaged, the Chinese Government overlooks these facts and does not respect Japan's position in that place. The Chinese Government even freely altered those articles which the Imperial Government, in a compromising spirit, have formulated in accordance with the statement of the Chinese Representatives,

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    arose, gaining a significant foothold in 1975, when Angola became independent, enabling more secure military bases to be established across the border. Over the 1970s, all the popular churches moved towards speaking out against apartheid, culminating in the establishment of the Council of Churches in Namibia (CCN)

  1. President J F Kennedy.

    conflicting opinions, Adams retired back to his private life, still in belief that he was a failure. In reading this book, I learned of the complicated role a Senator plays in politics. Kennedy shows the reader, clearly, how controversial government really is.

  2. South Africa 1945-1994 - "The End Of Apartheid".

    Also, when de Klerk and Mandela met, they had formed a good working relationship. De Klerk's National Party was losing support. In the 1989 elections, they had their worst result since 1948. De Klerk knew he would have to either support change, or return to strict apartheid rule.

  1. Case Study on Nazi Genocide.

    Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."vi The holocaust certainly fits into the parameters of genocide as defined in Article 2.

  2. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    He thought that he needed to change apartheid because the white superiority was fading throughout the world with many black colonies becoming independent nations. He gave the blacks an opportunity to develop on their own, separately from the whites, in their homelands.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work