• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks Democracy effectively means that we, the people, get to choose who runs our country on our behalf. The role of a monarch as Head of State, embodying rule by inheritance, is, therefore, anathema to the purest concept of democracy. So, with this in mind, events in June 2003 caused a certain degree of amusement to me. Democracy 'The worst form of government-except for all the others.' Winston Churchill Increasing democracy is by far the most important and powerful reason to ditch the monarchy. All other reasons either follow on from it or pale in comparison to the strength of the argument. The word democracy is ultimately derived from the Greek demokratia which is a term comprised of demos - 'the people' - and kratos - 'strength, power.' So, democracy basically means that power lies in the hands of the people. In most developed countries, this entails the direct election of a legislative (Parliament) and an elected Head of State (whether ceremonial or with a full range of executive powers). Unfortunately, Britain has lagged behind other developed countries in both these areas. Our Head of State (the Queen) and, until recently, the majority of the House of Lords assumed power and influence solely because of which families they were born in to. ...read more.

Middle

He receives �359,000 per annum (probably spent on guns). This extra payment could be immediately wiped out. Only one person - the Head of State - needs to be supported in their activities by the country's taxes. With the former Monarchy forced to live in their private residences, more (and more of the) state owned palaces and properties would be made available for public viewing. It's entirely likely that more people would visit these sites and therefore more income would be generated for the Treasury. Such income could then be spent on the things that really matter to all of us - the NHS, education, etc. I do not accept the argument that less people would visit Britain if we no longer had a monarchy; most current tourists only get to see the public buildings and ceremonies as it is. Other than the jubilee, the site of a royal in public is a rare thing indeed. Decreased security costs - if the President fulfils only a ceremonial role (less people to protect). Decreased travel expenses - if we have a ceremonial President, there will be fewer in the entourage, less security, better use of existing methods of transportation. The phrase "time is money" applies here, too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Monarchs are not subject to the influences which corrupt short-term presidents. A monarch looks back on centuries of history and forward to the well-being of the entire nation under his heir. By retaining certain constitutional powers, or at least denying them to others, a monarch is the safeguard against civil or military dictatorship. Sir Winston Churchill said that had the Kaiser still been German Head of State after 1918, Hitler could not have come to power, or at least not remained there. In Italy, when in 1943 he had the opportunity to do so, King Victor Emmanuel removed Mussolini from office. Romania's King Michael dismissed the dictator Antonescu and transferred his country from Axis to the Allies, for which he was decorated by the Great Powers, and in Bulgaria King Boris III (although obliged to enter the war on the side of the Axis), bravely refused to persecute Bulgarian Jews and would not commit his forces outside his country's borders. As we have seen in Spain and Thailand, monarchs have succeeded in defending democracy against the threat of permanent military take-over. Even Royal Families which are not reigning are dedicated to the service of their people, and continue to be regarded as the symbol of the nation. Prominent examples are H.R.H. the Duke of Braganza in Portugal and H.R.H. the Count of Paris in France. Royal Families forced to live in exile are often promoters of charities formed to help their countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    It would be right to say that reformation in the House of Lords where hereditary peers are being eradicated is a good thing as it allows more democracy. Which will give more seats to individuals who have earned their place in the House of Lords rather than those who were heirs.

  2. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    Having no rival in this sense helps the president appeal directly to the heart of the American people and makes them the foremost person in American politics. This is essentially the American president's greatest political asset. Political skill is certainly an important factor in the success that presidents have in asserting leadership.

  1. 'THE SEPERATION OF POWERS: FACT OR FICTION UNDER THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION?'

    Law lord, put something in about female law lord here!!! Despite the overlap between the judiciary and Parliament in legislation, the order of precedence is clear. It is generally accepted that the courts are not empowered to rule on the validity of Acts of Parliament.

  2. The Creation of the Welfare State

    There was a major impact on the people of Britain throughout the evacuation and also after. Various types of people had been evacuated, for example elderly people, disabled people, pregnant women, working class children middleclass children and teachers. These evacuations were made from London to the countryside to host families.

  1. A Short History of the Basque Country.

    Official Basque Government information estimates that over 150,000 Basques spent some time in exile in France. This is an enormous number if one takes into account that the entire population of the four Basque provinces of the Spanish State in 1936 was only 1,300,000.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    The Government of India has always put pressure on Pakistani regimes through statements and the international community. But even in Musharraf's regime the problem of Kashmir remained unresolved. Indian has always been blaming Pakistan of supporting the different militant groups working to disrupt the law & order situation in Kashmir.

  1. Was the Great Leap Forward a ‘Tragedy of Good Intentions’?

    In order to increase the agricultural output with the minimum investment, Mao established total control over the population, creating a tense overcharged political atmosphere obligating people to adhere to his policies and dictating. This enabled him to mobilize the masses of peasant labor, following up by lowering the design standards

  2. How far do you agree that the transition from meritocracy to democracy between 1832 ...

    no threat to those in power, however the concessions made were in no way timely as they were only given if those above did not feel threatened. Trade Unions were a type of pressure from below as they were a working class organisation, their involvement in the political system showed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work