• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks Democracy effectively means that we, the people, get to choose who runs our country on our behalf. The role of a monarch as Head of State, embodying rule by inheritance, is, therefore, anathema to the purest concept of democracy. So, with this in mind, events in June 2003 caused a certain degree of amusement to me. Democracy 'The worst form of government-except for all the others.' Winston Churchill Increasing democracy is by far the most important and powerful reason to ditch the monarchy. All other reasons either follow on from it or pale in comparison to the strength of the argument. The word democracy is ultimately derived from the Greek demokratia which is a term comprised of demos - 'the people' - and kratos - 'strength, power.' So, democracy basically means that power lies in the hands of the people. In most developed countries, this entails the direct election of a legislative (Parliament) and an elected Head of State (whether ceremonial or with a full range of executive powers). Unfortunately, Britain has lagged behind other developed countries in both these areas. Our Head of State (the Queen) and, until recently, the majority of the House of Lords assumed power and influence solely because of which families they were born in to. ...read more.

Middle

He receives �359,000 per annum (probably spent on guns). This extra payment could be immediately wiped out. Only one person - the Head of State - needs to be supported in their activities by the country's taxes. With the former Monarchy forced to live in their private residences, more (and more of the) state owned palaces and properties would be made available for public viewing. It's entirely likely that more people would visit these sites and therefore more income would be generated for the Treasury. Such income could then be spent on the things that really matter to all of us - the NHS, education, etc. I do not accept the argument that less people would visit Britain if we no longer had a monarchy; most current tourists only get to see the public buildings and ceremonies as it is. Other than the jubilee, the site of a royal in public is a rare thing indeed. Decreased security costs - if the President fulfils only a ceremonial role (less people to protect). Decreased travel expenses - if we have a ceremonial President, there will be fewer in the entourage, less security, better use of existing methods of transportation. The phrase "time is money" applies here, too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Monarchs are not subject to the influences which corrupt short-term presidents. A monarch looks back on centuries of history and forward to the well-being of the entire nation under his heir. By retaining certain constitutional powers, or at least denying them to others, a monarch is the safeguard against civil or military dictatorship. Sir Winston Churchill said that had the Kaiser still been German Head of State after 1918, Hitler could not have come to power, or at least not remained there. In Italy, when in 1943 he had the opportunity to do so, King Victor Emmanuel removed Mussolini from office. Romania's King Michael dismissed the dictator Antonescu and transferred his country from Axis to the Allies, for which he was decorated by the Great Powers, and in Bulgaria King Boris III (although obliged to enter the war on the side of the Axis), bravely refused to persecute Bulgarian Jews and would not commit his forces outside his country's borders. As we have seen in Spain and Thailand, monarchs have succeeded in defending democracy against the threat of permanent military take-over. Even Royal Families which are not reigning are dedicated to the service of their people, and continue to be regarded as the symbol of the nation. Prominent examples are H.R.H. the Duke of Braganza in Portugal and H.R.H. the Count of Paris in France. Royal Families forced to live in exile are often promoters of charities formed to help their countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Creation of the Welfare State

    Ways that showed that the government were taking action in getting people out of poverty were by introducing the Family allowance, National insurance, and the National Assistance Acts. In Source A, if the benefits were given then the pregnant lady would be able to buy essentials like a pair of 'Shoes'.

  2. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    Without the existence of monarchy, the royal building and activities may not be so brilliant and well decorated.

  1. 'THE SEPERATION OF POWERS: FACT OR FICTION UNDER THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION?'

    Law lord, put something in about female law lord here!!! Despite the overlap between the judiciary and Parliament in legislation, the order of precedence is clear. It is generally accepted that the courts are not empowered to rule on the validity of Acts of Parliament.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    The objects on display came from all parts of the world, including India and the countries with recent white settlements, such as Australia and New Zealand that constituted the new empire. The profits from the event allowed for the foundation of public works such as the Albert Hall, the Science

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    However, although this was the most controversial of his reforms this was the most subtle. It was not long after, in 1926, Ataturk removed the constitutional provision decreeing Islam as the state religion, however, there were rebellions that took place as a result of this, however, the Law for the Maintenance of Order was extended to stop such riots.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    his rule were forced to tender their resignation or were posted as Officer on Special Duty (OSDs)14. Zia in order to give the President more powers introduced the 8th amendment in the constitution according to which the President has the authority to dismiss the elected governments.

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    Only in 1384 Emperor Taizu decided to reinstate the official examinations based on Zhu Xi's interpretation of Confucian thought, which became the official interpretation until the abolishment of the examination system. Fukuyama also writes that "the Confucian family system provides a certain protected sphere of private life that is relatively free of state intrusion" (p.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    Unfortunately such developments led to the spreading of terrorism and other threats like Aids and brought with them other problems related to pollution 1. Robert Pirsig, in his ?Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance? said that even if positive element of modern technology are diluted by negative element

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work