• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks Democracy effectively means that we, the people, get to choose who runs our country on our behalf. The role of a monarch as Head of State, embodying rule by inheritance, is, therefore, anathema to the purest concept of democracy. So, with this in mind, events in June 2003 caused a certain degree of amusement to me. Democracy 'The worst form of government-except for all the others.' Winston Churchill Increasing democracy is by far the most important and powerful reason to ditch the monarchy. All other reasons either follow on from it or pale in comparison to the strength of the argument. The word democracy is ultimately derived from the Greek demokratia which is a term comprised of demos - 'the people' - and kratos - 'strength, power.' So, democracy basically means that power lies in the hands of the people. In most developed countries, this entails the direct election of a legislative (Parliament) and an elected Head of State (whether ceremonial or with a full range of executive powers). Unfortunately, Britain has lagged behind other developed countries in both these areas. Our Head of State (the Queen) and, until recently, the majority of the House of Lords assumed power and influence solely because of which families they were born in to. ...read more.

Middle

He receives �359,000 per annum (probably spent on guns). This extra payment could be immediately wiped out. Only one person - the Head of State - needs to be supported in their activities by the country's taxes. With the former Monarchy forced to live in their private residences, more (and more of the) state owned palaces and properties would be made available for public viewing. It's entirely likely that more people would visit these sites and therefore more income would be generated for the Treasury. Such income could then be spent on the things that really matter to all of us - the NHS, education, etc. I do not accept the argument that less people would visit Britain if we no longer had a monarchy; most current tourists only get to see the public buildings and ceremonies as it is. Other than the jubilee, the site of a royal in public is a rare thing indeed. Decreased security costs - if the President fulfils only a ceremonial role (less people to protect). Decreased travel expenses - if we have a ceremonial President, there will be fewer in the entourage, less security, better use of existing methods of transportation. The phrase "time is money" applies here, too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Monarchs are not subject to the influences which corrupt short-term presidents. A monarch looks back on centuries of history and forward to the well-being of the entire nation under his heir. By retaining certain constitutional powers, or at least denying them to others, a monarch is the safeguard against civil or military dictatorship. Sir Winston Churchill said that had the Kaiser still been German Head of State after 1918, Hitler could not have come to power, or at least not remained there. In Italy, when in 1943 he had the opportunity to do so, King Victor Emmanuel removed Mussolini from office. Romania's King Michael dismissed the dictator Antonescu and transferred his country from Axis to the Allies, for which he was decorated by the Great Powers, and in Bulgaria King Boris III (although obliged to enter the war on the side of the Axis), bravely refused to persecute Bulgarian Jews and would not commit his forces outside his country's borders. As we have seen in Spain and Thailand, monarchs have succeeded in defending democracy against the threat of permanent military take-over. Even Royal Families which are not reigning are dedicated to the service of their people, and continue to be regarded as the symbol of the nation. Prominent examples are H.R.H. the Duke of Braganza in Portugal and H.R.H. the Count of Paris in France. Royal Families forced to live in exile are often promoters of charities formed to help their countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    The question, which Scuton emphasised in his lecture, was 'aristocrats' meaning in the Greek term 'rule by the best' how does one know that 'rule by the best is not rule by the worst'? The discovery that we have voted for the wrong people leads to ejection from office.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    One of them was that the Maltese at Algiers had to be loyal to the French administrations. The French government granted his dominance over the whole country, and the Maltese being under the British influence could have disagreed with certain French perspectives.

  1. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    All recent presidents have appointed at least one black person and one woman to their cabinet. Finally, cabinet is essential to maintaining a good relationship with congress, the key obstacle at times to presidential authority. It is necessary for a president to be successful that he exercises strategic and tactical leadership of congress.

  2. 'THE SEPERATION OF POWERS: FACT OR FICTION UNDER THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION?'

    All three of the arms of government exercise functions that in a strict separation of powers should really reside elsewhere.

  1. The Creation of the Welfare State

    some children who hadn't had a bath in two months or more, they also found that a few children didn't even know how to use a toilet properly.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    In the recent past, V.C.Rs and Kalashnikov Rifles have symbolized our culture. Social interest has given way to urban violence and terrorist activities. This may be attributed to lack of employment and social insecurity and the ever increasing chasm between the 'Haves' and 'Have-nots'.

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    so the defeat of the Sultan would mean that Turkey would move away from religion and more towards a secular society whereby religion was not predominant.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    like pollution, we still are doing our best to counter these negative elements and bring out the most of the positive element of technology. 1. Even waste management and Renewable energy resources are becoming more popular and cheaper to use so that we reduced the negative element that technology brought with us.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work