• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks Democracy effectively means that we, the people, get to choose who runs our country on our behalf. The role of a monarch as Head of State, embodying rule by inheritance, is, therefore, anathema to the purest concept of democracy. So, with this in mind, events in June 2003 caused a certain degree of amusement to me. Democracy 'The worst form of government-except for all the others.' Winston Churchill Increasing democracy is by far the most important and powerful reason to ditch the monarchy. All other reasons either follow on from it or pale in comparison to the strength of the argument. The word democracy is ultimately derived from the Greek demokratia which is a term comprised of demos - 'the people' - and kratos - 'strength, power.' So, democracy basically means that power lies in the hands of the people. In most developed countries, this entails the direct election of a legislative (Parliament) and an elected Head of State (whether ceremonial or with a full range of executive powers). Unfortunately, Britain has lagged behind other developed countries in both these areas. Our Head of State (the Queen) and, until recently, the majority of the House of Lords assumed power and influence solely because of which families they were born in to. ...read more.

Middle

He receives �359,000 per annum (probably spent on guns). This extra payment could be immediately wiped out. Only one person - the Head of State - needs to be supported in their activities by the country's taxes. With the former Monarchy forced to live in their private residences, more (and more of the) state owned palaces and properties would be made available for public viewing. It's entirely likely that more people would visit these sites and therefore more income would be generated for the Treasury. Such income could then be spent on the things that really matter to all of us - the NHS, education, etc. I do not accept the argument that less people would visit Britain if we no longer had a monarchy; most current tourists only get to see the public buildings and ceremonies as it is. Other than the jubilee, the site of a royal in public is a rare thing indeed. Decreased security costs - if the President fulfils only a ceremonial role (less people to protect). Decreased travel expenses - if we have a ceremonial President, there will be fewer in the entourage, less security, better use of existing methods of transportation. The phrase "time is money" applies here, too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Monarchs are not subject to the influences which corrupt short-term presidents. A monarch looks back on centuries of history and forward to the well-being of the entire nation under his heir. By retaining certain constitutional powers, or at least denying them to others, a monarch is the safeguard against civil or military dictatorship. Sir Winston Churchill said that had the Kaiser still been German Head of State after 1918, Hitler could not have come to power, or at least not remained there. In Italy, when in 1943 he had the opportunity to do so, King Victor Emmanuel removed Mussolini from office. Romania's King Michael dismissed the dictator Antonescu and transferred his country from Axis to the Allies, for which he was decorated by the Great Powers, and in Bulgaria King Boris III (although obliged to enter the war on the side of the Axis), bravely refused to persecute Bulgarian Jews and would not commit his forces outside his country's borders. As we have seen in Spain and Thailand, monarchs have succeeded in defending democracy against the threat of permanent military take-over. Even Royal Families which are not reigning are dedicated to the service of their people, and continue to be regarded as the symbol of the nation. Prominent examples are H.R.H. the Duke of Braganza in Portugal and H.R.H. the Count of Paris in France. Royal Families forced to live in exile are often promoters of charities formed to help their countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Creation of the Welfare State

    It consisted of the five main 'giants' of problems the country was suffering from. These problems were: Want (desire for money and out of poverty); Squalor (Poor housing facilities); Ignorance (lack of education); Idleness (unemployment), and Disease (poor health). Firstly, Want is some ways did improve the lives of working people in Britain.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    After the Great Exhibition closed, the Crystal Palace was moved to Sydenham Hill in South London and reconstructed in what was, in effect, a 200-acre Victorian theme park. Queen Victoria opened the new Crystal Palace Park at Sydenham on June 10th, 1854.

  1. Was the Great Leap Forward a ‘Tragedy of Good Intentions’?

    not report back to Khrushchev that the whole country was starving.30 Secondly, the weather was not that bad over the course of the Great Leap. In fact, in 1958 there was a record harvest, but the peasants were too busy manning the backyard furnaces to gather the grain.

  2. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    In 1927, Nguyen Thai Hoc founded the radical Viet Nam Quoc Dan Damg (VNQDD) or Vietnam Nationalist Party with the aim of overthrowing the colonial government. Up to 1941, the VNQDD was the leading political organisation in Indo-China. It was modelled along the Kuomintang (KMT)

  1. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    Unfortunately Benazir failed in getting the desired results. Benazir was basically a split personality person. On one side she was projecting cosmopolitan and worldly experience; on the other hand she was revealing her narrowly defined restricted life ways. It was the latter personality that influenced her behaviour as Prime Minister.

  2. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    In addition to make this function work The Royal Family is that all its members show concern for the economically underprivileged, for example by their involvement with charitable activities and organizations. The next thing to pick up is that the monarchy provides the symbol of national continuity and tradition.

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    I believe that once governments have taken office and have began to make the official decisions of government on public policy, elected representatives are guided by self interest, give first priority to enhancing and perpetuating their own political power and are highly responsive to the special interests and demands of

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    Anthony Bonanno shows us that we should preserve the temples that were left by those before us because they are aesthetically fascinating and show the present and future generation what kind of people used to live before us. Chapter 11: My role as a Democratic Citizen 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work