• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

-Did the Weimar Republic become more stable?-How loyal were the elites and the German people to democracy?

Extracts from this document...


Politics 1924-29 -Did the Weimar Republic become more stable? -How loyal were the elites and the German people to democracy? Statement: Was a firm political and economic foundation established for the long term survival of democracy or whether the events justify the view that the Weimar was a 'republic without republicans'. After 1923 politics became more peaceful. There were no attempted coups from right or left between 1924 and 1929 and also there were no assassinations of major political figures. Extremist parties though was still on the streets, there was frequent fights between the SA and the red fighting league, over 50 people were killed. Elections also gave support to the Republic, as the economic situation stabilised in 1924, so Germans switched back to voting for the main democratic parties. ...read more.


It was therefore the party machine that decided who actually became a Reichstag deputy, on the basis of the number of votes the party list had won. The voters didn't choose their deputy. The prospects for a stable government were further reduced during this period of growth of sectional interest parties which gained a total of 78 deputies at their peak in 1930. Sectional groups were encouraged by the proportional representation system cos only 60k votes were needed to get a representation in the Reichstag. Their support for narrow interests reduced the chances of the broader compromises required for successful democratic government. Weimar lacked a leader to deepen people's support, it was served by able politicians like Streseman but no body built up a dynamic support for the government. ...read more.


The candidate who gets most votes is President. The SPD prussion leader Braun pulled out and the centre party chose Wilhelm Marx. The right in an attempt to broaden support rallied behind Paul Von Hinderburg. The communists refused to withdraw to help a united left against the right, the figures suggest this may have been vital in determining the result. The appointment of Hinderburg can be seen as both a pos and neg sign for Weimar democracy. He did nothing unconstitutional and abided his oath to uphold the constitution. The presence of a conservative ex field marshal attracted some conservatives to the republic. But on the other hand it was threatening to have someone who was uncommitted to democracy with great powers. Hindenburg became the focus of powerful groups who wanted a more strict system. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To What extent did the Weimar Republic recover by 1929?

    On top of all of this Germany still had to make reparation payment as the Young Plan just gave her more time to pay reparations. Overall I believe that Germany made a good recovery for the time being, They were stable and I think well on her way to full

  2. Why were people unhappy with the Weimar Government?

    However the Government did not have the money so they came up with printing even more money. This caused the economy to go into chaos as the value of the mark went down against the dollar. Prices were rising and wages went up.

  1. What Were the Reasons for the Early Weaknesses of the Weimar Republic

    paying countries for the damage caused. This mandatory payment was an early sign of the weaknesses evident in Germany, but also the weak state the government was heading towards. The reparations were funded by loans; this meant that that the ratio of money borrowed and going out was greater than the ratio coming in.

  2. The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; ...

    However most supporters and I would strongly disagree with the idea that parliamentary government involves any great danger to individual liberty. Independent courts, an alert and vocal parliamentary opposition, such as in the UK with 'Question Time' in the House of Commons, and the mutual suspicions within multi-party coalition cabinets

  1. Why did Mussolini become leader of

    Dissatisfaction with the territorial settlement made at the Paris peace conference got in the way of the glorious light from the victory of war as the Italians did not gain what they hoped to. Most Italians expected big territorial gains when they entered war.

  2. American Democracy: An Ongoing Experiment

    In the period from 1880 to 1915, the country absorbed over twenty million immigrants, the majority of whom were Jews and Catholics from Southern and Eastern Europe.2 This influx of immigrants was seen as a threat to Protestantism in America.

  1. Describe the Foundation of the Weimar Constitution.

    would also nominate the chancellor, whose job was similar to that of the British Prime Minister. What was notable about the constitution was that the President had power alone to dissolve and instate the Reichstag at his discretion in accordance to Article 48 of the constitution.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    It is a curious and interesting fact that when it comes to voting Maltese people have one of the highest percentages of participation. Also lately there have been a big change in the number of voters that change their political party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work