• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dmowski VS. Pilsudski

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dmowski VS. Pilsudski Maximilian Stella Humanities May 21, 2001 Jozef Klemens Pilsudski is regarded as one of the greatest Poles ever lived by historians and generals all over the world. He organized political uprisings and fought an underground battle against the occupying countries, he struggled and especially disliked the Russians. Another Polish well-known politician during WWI and the recreation of Poland was Roman Dmowski. Just as Pilsudski, Dmowski's biggest dream was to give the Polish people an independent state and government. Just as Pilsudski, he struggled and organized a party that fought against the countries that had divided Poland among themselves by force in 1795, they had though very different views on how and whom they should fight... Dmowski and Pilsudski wanted to somehow unite the distinct types of political groupings. The mayor three institutions that had to be controlled were the Church, Army and the Intelligentsia. The Catholic Church was represented by an arch-conservative hierarchy and a lesser clergy. The Church supported Dmowski because of his opinion that Poland should be only for Poles and have only one church, the Catholic. ...read more.

Middle

The Germans had a socialist party, the DSAP, and a nationalist party, the Jungedeutsche Partei. The Jews in Poland didn't really have one or two big parties. They were divided among hundreds of different small independent political groups. In contrast, the Byelorussians had one organization that represented them all, the Hramada. The Ukrainians took over and organizations a lot of parties after that Poland lost its areas around Lwow, they also organized a widespread campaign of terrorism and sabotage. On the side there were also a number of vociferous groups on the political fringe. The Fascists were on the Right and the Communists at the left. Those were problems to be solved by the two leaders. Both Dmowski and Pilsudski were democrats, they wanted though to achieve their goals in very different ways. In the pre-war time they both sought help from foreign countries, Dmowski visited Washington, later on Japan were he met Pilsudski. Dmowski organized a National League and wanted to fight the Germans from Paris, he sought the Russian as less dangerous and wanted therefore to restrain good relationships with them. ...read more.

Conclusion

As mentioned before, Pilsudski was tolerant against all races and beliefs. His concept of a nation was simply that all the people sharing the same goals, values and loyalties, could create a good-working nation. As hundreds of years earlier, when Poland was the biggest country in Europe, including tens of different minorities and races, Pilsudski believed that it could once again unite and fight for their independence. Dmowski however, saw one race as one nation. He didn't tolerate the people with different languages, beliefs and history to form a nation. He believed that God had segregated them for a purpose and that was to create distinctive, separate nations. Pilsudski tolerated all religions and nationalities that fought for an independent Polish state, therefore he got more people with him and managed to re-create Poland. Although they both shared the same goal, Pilsudski's plan ended up being correct and after leading the Polish army to victory in the Battle of Warsaw, he was praised as the man who freed Poland and it's people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    mid-1930s to use strikes as a political weapon to make their demands heard. 4. Although Burma was a province of India, it was treated differently with regard to political reforms. Thus, the liberal Montague-Chelmsford reforms of 1919, which provided for an elected majority in the central legislature and a part-Indian executive at the provincial level were not applied to Burma.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    Throughout the turmoil of the Warlord era and the betrayal of the Paris Peace Conference, the Chinese nation underwent a period of intense change. The expansion of the working class and new intellectual ideals from the West saw one of the most influential social revolutions in Chinese history in the form of the New Culture Movement and May Fourth Movement.

  1. Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

    Sovereignty should be in the hands of the people. That's democracy. Money For me, finance isn't the major issue in the case against the monarchy that some people claim it to be. Firstly, because democratic, social and political arguements take precedence.

  2. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    was all-pervasive" (Lee, 2000, p. 647). Lee's efforts in controlling corruption in Singapore show clearly that he was aware of the problem and that he was convinced that democratic practices would not work in favor of it. Despite the claim that Asian culture is highly supportive of authoritarianism, a number

  1. Britain - A Tolerant Nation?

    of compassion that kept many blacks going when life in Britain was disheartening. Some minority ethnic groups were more visual than others and consequently, as a result endured more cultural idiosyncrasy in contrast to those less evident 'white' minority tribal groups such as the Irish.

  2. The causes and possible solutions of the ethnic conflict between Russians and Estonians in ...

    of the unjust policies - an event many Estonians wish to happen. This is illustrated by the results of a survey carried out in the year 2000. According to the results acquired by EMOR, 30 per cent of Estonians wish Russians left and only 2 per cent wish they stayed.3 This position is also shared by the state officials.

  1. The three ways of the independence of the countries of the Pact of Warsaw: ...

    In a second time, they organized some parallel universities through courses held by important teachers that professed publicly their political faith. They warned the government about the serious crisis of trust that had struck Polish people, but nobody wanted to listen.

  2. Prospects for India's development

    an Indian Airlines plane in December of 1999 remains a source of embarrassment for India. Peace between the two countries is not yet on the horizon. Pakistan cannot initiate peace because its new military regime requires the immediate Indian threat to legitimate its existence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work