• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Emergence of the concept of popular sovereignty and democracy in the British political system."

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

We can easily see how British system has transformed from absolute monarchy to constitutional monarchy. This did not happen through one night's work, there have been terrible struggles between monarchs and newly established parliament. It took more than four centuries for parliament to create full dominance over monarchy after Magna Carta and additional three hundred years to develop its political system to its elaborate present condition. From these centuries of developing Britain, we can derive many good lessons in order to compare them to other political systems. We can compare it in a sense that we, in Kyrgyzstan, have newly established presidential democracy after 70 years of totalitarian rule under Soviet Russia. One in Kyrgyzstan might critically say that we need not presidential but parliamentary democracy with relatively strong and responsible to Parliament head of state like that in Britain. He would argue depending on the stability of political system in UK and would like to have such system here. What are the contributions to the emergence of popular sovereignty and how it eventually led to the democracy? ...read more.

Middle

Idea of popular sovereignty, citizens' involvement in government policies, did not take considerable weight until 1928 when universal suffrage was reached. The industrial revolution contributed by strengthening the position of working class, which become more politically conscious. Popular sovereignty is very crucial in constructing the government policies in a sense that it involves great part of population in electing the legislative which later on forms the government putting their leader as a head of the state and government both, who is responsible to Commons, which in turn is responsible to the electorate. Here we can observe interrelated and interdependent chain of elements whose final destination is to make good government strategies for the future. Really, each element is dependent to each other and it creates excellent democratic relations between them. It seems that people are the freest among these, but if we speculate further we can see that, they are dependant on their own decision to elect the right candidates. Otherwise, if they choose not the best candidate they would be victims of their own will. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are group of ministers in the cabinet, formed by prime minister, bureaucratic staff, and various semipublic agencies, which are involved in the government decision or can influence on decision. The good example of ignoring the rest of the government is the eurosceptic policy of Margaret Thatcher in the late 1980s, which came out not very good for her. Saying all these things above I would like to point that Britain had very slow but elaborate political change in its system. Every step was given strong attention and made under responsible acts. For the current time it is the most stable forms of established liberal-democracies. However, as we cannot predict our future, will British government be able to maintain its position and political regime in its condition as todays? How long this regime will last? Because as we can learn from history, needed regimes emerged at certain points and the central actors were always common people. Here I would like to put Artyem's statement about the future politics: "May be there will emerge other, different forms of regimes that will best meet the necessities of people"? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    It would bring hardship and repression, but there would be no going back to the securities of the past. The population were no longer going to accept policies the Government might undemocratically choose. This was a period of political reform.

  2. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    Some powers, previously held by the UK parliament at Westminster were given to the Scottish Parliament. The Scottish Parliament is designed to embody and reflect the sharing of power between the people of Scotland, the Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs)

  1. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    Sale of the Distribution Company of privatization/management contracts can help, as long as tendering and contracting processes are transparent and contract execution can be monitored. Reducing non-cash transactions including barter and arrears offsets can also reduce private rent seeking, as non-cash exchange at artificially inflated rates is a standard method of extracting private gains.

  2. America has a two-party political system.

    not necessarily the show of strength by Federal Government (although this clearly showed the capability of the state to act to suppress extra-constitutional actions), but the effect it had of creating an issue war. By creating an issue war, it allowed one group to mobilise against the other, in this

  1. What is sovereignty?

    Conventions are a weak source of the constitution, which is a weakness of the constitution. Because the constitution uses convention as a source a government can chose to follow or to not follow the conventions from before, because Parliament is sovereign.

  2. 'THE SEPERATION OF POWERS: FACT OR FICTION UNDER THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION?'

    However, although his model was said to be based on the English constitution, on looking closer it reveals that there are serious differences between Montesquieu's theory and political reality in the UK. THE LEGISLATURE AND THE EXECUTIVE The most striking is the dominance of the legislature by the executive.

  1. The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; ...

    The presidential system offers a strong case for new democracies to adopt it. New democratic regimes need stability and the fixed term in office for the president offers that providing continuity in the executive, and so avoiding collapse of governing coalitions experienced by parliamentary governments.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    just criticize and only the rest would get involved in a campaign. 1. We also still see that in Malta we have lots of discrimination when it comes to gender and skin color. Some say it?s a cultural problem but Enslin and White say that it had become natural that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work