• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Emergence of the concept of popular sovereignty and democracy in the British political system."

Extracts from this document...


We can easily see how British system has transformed from absolute monarchy to constitutional monarchy. This did not happen through one night's work, there have been terrible struggles between monarchs and newly established parliament. It took more than four centuries for parliament to create full dominance over monarchy after Magna Carta and additional three hundred years to develop its political system to its elaborate present condition. From these centuries of developing Britain, we can derive many good lessons in order to compare them to other political systems. We can compare it in a sense that we, in Kyrgyzstan, have newly established presidential democracy after 70 years of totalitarian rule under Soviet Russia. One in Kyrgyzstan might critically say that we need not presidential but parliamentary democracy with relatively strong and responsible to Parliament head of state like that in Britain. He would argue depending on the stability of political system in UK and would like to have such system here. What are the contributions to the emergence of popular sovereignty and how it eventually led to the democracy? ...read more.


Idea of popular sovereignty, citizens' involvement in government policies, did not take considerable weight until 1928 when universal suffrage was reached. The industrial revolution contributed by strengthening the position of working class, which become more politically conscious. Popular sovereignty is very crucial in constructing the government policies in a sense that it involves great part of population in electing the legislative which later on forms the government putting their leader as a head of the state and government both, who is responsible to Commons, which in turn is responsible to the electorate. Here we can observe interrelated and interdependent chain of elements whose final destination is to make good government strategies for the future. Really, each element is dependent to each other and it creates excellent democratic relations between them. It seems that people are the freest among these, but if we speculate further we can see that, they are dependant on their own decision to elect the right candidates. Otherwise, if they choose not the best candidate they would be victims of their own will. ...read more.


There are group of ministers in the cabinet, formed by prime minister, bureaucratic staff, and various semipublic agencies, which are involved in the government decision or can influence on decision. The good example of ignoring the rest of the government is the eurosceptic policy of Margaret Thatcher in the late 1980s, which came out not very good for her. Saying all these things above I would like to point that Britain had very slow but elaborate political change in its system. Every step was given strong attention and made under responsible acts. For the current time it is the most stable forms of established liberal-democracies. However, as we cannot predict our future, will British government be able to maintain its position and political regime in its condition as todays? How long this regime will last? Because as we can learn from history, needed regimes emerged at certain points and the central actors were always common people. Here I would like to put Artyem's statement about the future politics: "May be there will emerge other, different forms of regimes that will best meet the necessities of people"? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    As a group, the Peelites began to dwindle following the death of Peel in 1850, but their support was still vital to the Whigs and to secure power in the 1852 election, they formed a coalition government with the Whigs under the leader of the Peelites' Lord Aberdeen.


    Interestingly, the balance of power may have shifted somewhat with our increased obligations to Europe. From early 1990 to the present day we have seen that the courts could disregard even primary legislation where it was in conflict with our treaty obligations to Europe as defined by the European Communities Act (1972).

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    Pitt returned as Prime Minister in 1803 following another outbreak of war. The second ministry was not as strong as the first. Nelson's victory in October ended the threat to Britain for the rest of the war. The battles of Ulm and Austerlitz in 1805 saw the collapse of the

  2. Russia - political past, present and future

    with the United States and the west, thus isolating itself from the rest of the world. The two super powers were now in competition to establish world hegemony. Whereas during the Cold War people in the United States lived with constant fear of the possible nuclear war, the Soviet citizens

  1. What is sovereignty?

    Conventions are a weak source of the constitution, which is a weakness of the constitution. Because the constitution uses convention as a source a government can chose to follow or to not follow the conventions from before, because Parliament is sovereign.

  2. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    After the disappointing results of the 1987 election the Conservatives adopted a new strategy within Scotland. In 1989 Michael Forsyth was made chairman of the Scottish Conservative party and believed that Scotland required more Thatcherite polices and believed that Scotland was, over-governed, over taxed and over dependent upon public services/out of date industries.

  1. The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; ...

    The presidential system offers a strong case for new democracies to adopt it. New democratic regimes need stability and the fixed term in office for the president offers that providing continuity in the executive, and so avoiding collapse of governing coalitions experienced by parliamentary governments.

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    Before the laws are implied over the society, they are first judged in a constitutional court to make sure that the government is not abusing his power. 1. Separation of power: the separation between the legislative and judicial power from the executive power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work