• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does the structure of government affect pressure group politics in the UK and USA?

Extracts from this document...


How does the structure of government affect pressure group politics in the UK and USA? (50 marks) In the UK and USA, pressure groups have similar aims; they seek to bring their agenda to the forefront of the political debate (particularly true of protectionist or sectional groups) and to secure legislation favourable to them in some way. The differences between the political system in these countries, however, means that these aims must be pursued in somewhat different manners. The most basic differences have wide ramification. In the USA, the separation of powers and the federal system mean that interest groups have a vast array of potential access points. Nationally, there is the executive (the President and Federal Bureaucracy)), both house of Congress and the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. The federal system ensures that there are also influential government bodies at state level - governors, legislatures and state courts can all become targets for interest group activity. ...read more.


They have few available resources for 'controlling' their members of Congress; party discipline is a case of 'carrots and twigs'. As a result, individual Congressmen and Senators are useful targets for pressure group activity. In the UK, Parliament is a much less appealing target. Out fusion of powers means that the executive is drawn from the majority party in the House of Commons, and by using this majority and the 'carrots and sticks' of party discipline, the executive is generally able to control the Commons. This is less true if the governing party is divided or if the majority is marginal, in which case pressure groups may find the Commons a more useful tool. The rest of the time, though, MPs lack sufficient independence to be mush use, and the Lords lack power. The difference is deepened by campaign finance rules - in the US, the party is limited and so candidates rely on the financial and organisational support of interest groups, and when elected will owe a debt of loyalty to their 'sponsor'. ...read more.


Only 'insider' groups are likely to be consulted on policy decisions. In the USA, the judiciary is a valid target because of the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Consequently, interest groups may bring cases themselves, or file 'amicus curiae' briefs in relevant case, eg. around 80 such briefs were filed in Webster v RHS on the abortion issue in 1987. British courts have no equivalent power, but the European Convention on Human Rights has encouraged pressure groups to bring test cases, eg. by supporting Diane Blood over the right to die. In conclusion, the structure of government means that groups in the USA can obtain the desired results in many different ways - by financing elections, lobbying at national, state or local level, bringing court cases and so on. This supports a pluralist model, in which numerous groups are able to have an influence on decision making. In the UK, the system narrows down the choice of targets to the executive. This leads to a corporatist style system where only a few key 'insider' groups are able to have a real influence by consultation with government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    They promised referendums on reform, devolution and the Euro, and since the Conservative Party were opposed to change involving these issues, a percentage of the electorate may have voted according to these policies. Referendums can be used to break deadlocks between the Houses of Lords and Commons.

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    hill people into the majority Bengali population were other bones of contention. It was in 1997 that the Jana Samhati Samiti (JSS), the armed wing of the struggle for Jummaland reached a peace accord with the Government of Bangladesh. The mainstream opposition party at that time, the BNP as well

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    became known as the English speaking churches); the Dutch Reformed Churches, which were Afrikaans speaking; the African Initiated Churches; the Roman Catholic Church, and the Pentecostal and Charismatic churches14. The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw the components of apartheid coming into place. The missionaries ironically formed segregation policies.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    All the votes are counted and each party receives seats in the constituency in the same proportion as the votes it won in that constituency. A quota is calculated for the constituency - the number of votes required to win one seat.

  1. The Uk policy making process.

    Assuming that the Bill has been given a Second Reading by the House of Commons, it then moves into a Standing Committee which scrutinises the Bill line by line in great detail and has the power to amend the Bill.

  2. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    Tactical voting 5. Disillusioned with party politics 6. Alienated by meaningless representative democracy 7. Social class and Partisan Alignment * A,B - Conservative * C - New Labour and Liberal Democrats * D,E - Labour and Socialists 8. Professional Circumstances * Professional - Divided (Educated, Reason) * Business - Conservative * Manual Work - Labour and Liberal Democrats

  1. 'The government controls parliament but it cannot always rely on getting its own way.' ...

    The metaphor of the Trojan Horse is one all governments would do well to keep in mind, since even for those with a large majority, the greatest danger can often come from within. Backbench disobedience plagues all governments at some point in their period in office, but can be most testing for those with a marginal majority.

  2. How does British Airways affect the government?

    entitled to a 40 minute lunch break, 30 minute tea break and 20 minute break. There is also a law for all cabin crew. This law clearly indicates that all cabin crew who work for 12 hours can not be called back for another job within the next 12 hours.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work