• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does the structure of government affect pressure group politics in the UK and USA?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does the structure of government affect pressure group politics in the UK and USA? (50 marks) In the UK and USA, pressure groups have similar aims; they seek to bring their agenda to the forefront of the political debate (particularly true of protectionist or sectional groups) and to secure legislation favourable to them in some way. The differences between the political system in these countries, however, means that these aims must be pursued in somewhat different manners. The most basic differences have wide ramification. In the USA, the separation of powers and the federal system mean that interest groups have a vast array of potential access points. Nationally, there is the executive (the President and Federal Bureaucracy)), both house of Congress and the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. The federal system ensures that there are also influential government bodies at state level - governors, legislatures and state courts can all become targets for interest group activity. ...read more.

Middle

They have few available resources for 'controlling' their members of Congress; party discipline is a case of 'carrots and twigs'. As a result, individual Congressmen and Senators are useful targets for pressure group activity. In the UK, Parliament is a much less appealing target. Out fusion of powers means that the executive is drawn from the majority party in the House of Commons, and by using this majority and the 'carrots and sticks' of party discipline, the executive is generally able to control the Commons. This is less true if the governing party is divided or if the majority is marginal, in which case pressure groups may find the Commons a more useful tool. The rest of the time, though, MPs lack sufficient independence to be mush use, and the Lords lack power. The difference is deepened by campaign finance rules - in the US, the party is limited and so candidates rely on the financial and organisational support of interest groups, and when elected will owe a debt of loyalty to their 'sponsor'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only 'insider' groups are likely to be consulted on policy decisions. In the USA, the judiciary is a valid target because of the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Consequently, interest groups may bring cases themselves, or file 'amicus curiae' briefs in relevant case, eg. around 80 such briefs were filed in Webster v RHS on the abortion issue in 1987. British courts have no equivalent power, but the European Convention on Human Rights has encouraged pressure groups to bring test cases, eg. by supporting Diane Blood over the right to die. In conclusion, the structure of government means that groups in the USA can obtain the desired results in many different ways - by financing elections, lobbying at national, state or local level, bringing court cases and so on. This supports a pluralist model, in which numerous groups are able to have an influence on decision making. In the UK, the system narrows down the choice of targets to the executive. This leads to a corporatist style system where only a few key 'insider' groups are able to have a real influence by consultation with government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    Overall, even though there are both advantages and disadvantages for the use of referendums, as long as referendums are fair and honest there is nothing wrong with using them to their full advantage. Year Referendum area Question Result (%) Turnout (%)

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Assembly How the System Works: Several variants of Additional Member Systems have been proposed, but basically they are a combination of the First-Past-The-Post system and party list voting. The purpose is to retain the best features of First-Past-The-Post while introducing proportionality between parties through party list voting.

  1. How does British Airways affect the government?

    Heathrow Airports terminal 5 will mainly be run by British Airways. The government has passed a law which states that British Airways must recycle at least 85% of waste in order to continue operating at this terminal. If they do not abide by this law, they will have to pay very heavy fines.

  2. What is Politics

    The result is public order. Public order? Governments lay down laws in order to create predictable patterns of behaviour. These laws reflect the ideology and morals of the society. The fact that people abide by these laws is known as public order.

  1. Ben Hanson - Politics - Mr

    can use the report as a way of scrutinising a particular piece of government policy or administration. However, unfortunately the Commons rairly debates committee reports, which can often let the government off the hook. Overall it could be said that committees have been a limited success.

  2. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    * Inactive - 41% of voters in 2001, disproportionate amount of young people. 1. Losing interests in low tech methods 2. Voting stations are inconveniently located 3. Disillusions of limited choice 4. Tactical voting 5. Disillusioned with party politics 6.

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    The laws of the land made a distinction between personal laws and the penal code, which formed part of civil jurisdiction. Institutions such as marriage, inheritance and other family-related matters fell under personal laws sanctified by religion of respective communities.

  2. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    Reformed pluralism concedes that access to political agenda is not always open. They accept that government-interest relations are often institutionalized to reduce conflicts and make producing policy easy, excluding certain groups and forming policy community (Smith 1990). A policy community is an institutionalized form of pressure group-government relationship that favors certain interests (Hill 1997:72).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work