• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does the structure of government affect pressure group politics in the UK and USA?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does the structure of government affect pressure group politics in the UK and USA? (50 marks) In the UK and USA, pressure groups have similar aims; they seek to bring their agenda to the forefront of the political debate (particularly true of protectionist or sectional groups) and to secure legislation favourable to them in some way. The differences between the political system in these countries, however, means that these aims must be pursued in somewhat different manners. The most basic differences have wide ramification. In the USA, the separation of powers and the federal system mean that interest groups have a vast array of potential access points. Nationally, there is the executive (the President and Federal Bureaucracy)), both house of Congress and the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. The federal system ensures that there are also influential government bodies at state level - governors, legislatures and state courts can all become targets for interest group activity. ...read more.

Middle

They have few available resources for 'controlling' their members of Congress; party discipline is a case of 'carrots and twigs'. As a result, individual Congressmen and Senators are useful targets for pressure group activity. In the UK, Parliament is a much less appealing target. Out fusion of powers means that the executive is drawn from the majority party in the House of Commons, and by using this majority and the 'carrots and sticks' of party discipline, the executive is generally able to control the Commons. This is less true if the governing party is divided or if the majority is marginal, in which case pressure groups may find the Commons a more useful tool. The rest of the time, though, MPs lack sufficient independence to be mush use, and the Lords lack power. The difference is deepened by campaign finance rules - in the US, the party is limited and so candidates rely on the financial and organisational support of interest groups, and when elected will owe a debt of loyalty to their 'sponsor'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only 'insider' groups are likely to be consulted on policy decisions. In the USA, the judiciary is a valid target because of the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Consequently, interest groups may bring cases themselves, or file 'amicus curiae' briefs in relevant case, eg. around 80 such briefs were filed in Webster v RHS on the abortion issue in 1987. British courts have no equivalent power, but the European Convention on Human Rights has encouraged pressure groups to bring test cases, eg. by supporting Diane Blood over the right to die. In conclusion, the structure of government means that groups in the USA can obtain the desired results in many different ways - by financing elections, lobbying at national, state or local level, bringing court cases and so on. This supports a pluralist model, in which numerous groups are able to have an influence on decision making. In the UK, the system narrows down the choice of targets to the executive. This leads to a corporatist style system where only a few key 'insider' groups are able to have a real influence by consultation with government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How does British Airways affect the government?

    Heathrow Airports terminal 5 will mainly be run by British Airways. The government has passed a law which states that British Airways must recycle at least 85% of waste in order to continue operating at this terminal. If they do not abide by this law, they will have to pay very heavy fines.

  2. What is Politics

    Whilst a criminal act is committed for selfish ends, an act of civil disobedience can be justified by reference to religious, moral and political principles' (Heywood, 1994, p.216). Civil disobedience is, in other words, political whilst a criminal act is not.

  1. Ben Hanson - Politics - Mr

    In 1945 the Salisbury convention was introduced, which stopped the House of Lords from opposing legislation, which was in its second reading and also promised in the governments election manifesto. However, this convention was introduced at a time when Clement Attlee's labour government won a landslide victory and had clear policies to introduce.

  2. What is Politics UK politics revision notes

    Tactical voting 5. Disillusioned with party politics 6. Alienated by meaningless representative democracy 7. Social class and Partisan Alignment * A,B - Conservative * C - New Labour and Liberal Democrats * D,E - Labour and Socialists 8. Professional Circumstances * Professional - Divided (Educated, Reason) * Business - Conservative * Manual Work - Labour and Liberal Democrats

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    On the other hand, a large section of these schools have been reportedly been receiving funds from sources in the Middle East, under the supervision of many Islamist parties. One of the prime bones of contention between the NGO activity and Islamist parties in the rural areas have been the subject of increasing visibility of women in the public sphere.

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    For example letters from bishops, petitions from congregations or the establishment of ecumenical councils are not items that can tangibly be measured. Instead they are qualitative factors that can profoundly effect the religious and socio-political arena of a country. By qualitative factors I mean a factor that has intrinsic value,

  1. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    perfect example being in 1955 when the Swedish government ignored the people's vote to continue to drive on the left hand side of the road. To consult and then to ignore the verdict is worse than ever to have sought an opinion in the first place.

  2. Pressure Groups.

    The other protesting method is using violence- this is when the group resorts to illegal methods in order for them to be taken seriously and some action to be taken. These people end up getting arrested. Some people put their lives at risk.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work