• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the transition from meritocracy to democracy between 1832 and 1932 was the result of pressure from below and timely concession from above?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that the transition from meritocracy to democracy between 1832 and 1932 was the result of pressure from below and timely concession from above? The move towards democracy may have been helped along by popular pressure, the coming together of groups in society for a political cause but as to whether it was the main driving force for concessions by Parliament, is a different matter. There are two types of pressure, the first being moral forces, which is those that use peaceful protest to get their views heard, the second grouping physical forces used other methods such as violence to put their point across, as they believed it to be the only way that worked. There are other factors that may have had an impact that should be considered also, such as the war. The physical forces within the Chartist movement (1837 to 1848) and the Suffragettes movement (1903 to 1914), proved to be a destructive to their causes more than anything else. After a Chartist meeting in Birmingham in July of 1839 there were the Bull Riots which saw the arrest of William Lovett, the leading spokesman of the "moral force" Chartism view, shortly after this the House of Commons rejected the Chartist petition, the riots would have had a negative effect on this decision, however small. ...read more.


This showed that there were elements of the working classes that were stake holders in society with property, rented and owned, thus they merited the vote. In 1871 the Trade Union Act was passed, after the Royal Commission had advised Gladstone to do so. Trade unions became very involved in politics and in getting political reform, at the turn of the century trade unions became linked with the Labour Party, trade unions decided in1900 to found their own political party, the Labour Representation Committee, which became the Labour Party in 1906. By becoming a political party, Trade Unions established themselves as a part of the system, thus showing that they are working within the meritocratic principle which equates to them not being a threat to the aristocracy as they were working with them, under their terms. Gaining concessions through out this period proved to be a difficult task as the aristocracy wanted to maintain their position within society and so before any concessions could be made they had to be sure they would still be in the driving seat. It was the ends what they kept in mind, the means were almost an irrelevance. ...read more.


The Suffragists proved that women were not hysterical or without reason as well as that they worked within the meritocractic principle leaving little reason for them not to be enfranchised. They also helped in the war effort stopping everything to help, they also changed the name of their magazine to "Britannia" to show patriotism. The women who received the vote in 1918 did nothing with it, which proved that they were no danger to the political system, they may even make it more conservative, and so the Equal Franchise Act in 1928 was not going to be a huge risk for the government to take. Once again the transition to democracy was based on the results being of no threat to the aristocracy, therefore not timely concessions or popular disorder. Physical forces proved to be ineffective as governments could not afford to be seen to be giving in to violence, moral forces on the other hand made politicians see that they merited the vote and although they are not the primary reason for the transition they certainly played a part. It is clear that the governments in office gave concessions only when it suited them, it was all for their benefit. Therefore the meritocratic democracy that was put in place was come to by fault rather than intention. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Louise Vaz St. Charles Six Form College ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    Disraeli and his party also had a wish for and active and imperial policy, which was the unifying theme of the party. This was demonstrated in Disraeli's second ministry with his great involvement in foreign activities. Disraeli did, like the Liberals, have a commitment to social reform but it was in a paternalistic approach.

  2. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Peel was also against the government being lead by illegal acts of the rabble, and felt that the government should not be held at ransom by anyone. Like the methods they employ, the organisation of the two groups would inevitably have some bearing on their success.

  1. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    key in understanding the chartists as a revolutionary movement for the working classes. The Charter made six demands for political change: universal manhood suffrage; annual parliaments; equal electoral districts; secret ballot; payment of MP's; the abolition of the property qualification.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Mixed Systems Additional Member System Lastly many newer systems, such as those recently adopted in Italy, New Zealand and Russia, use mixed systems, although with a variety of alternative designs. The Additional Member System used in Germany combines single member and party list constituencies.

  1. The Suffragettes Project

    In one eighteen month period, Emmeline Pankhurst, who was now in her fifties, endured ten of these hunger-strikes. The summer of 1913 saw a further escalation of WSPU violence. In July attempts were made by suffragettes to burn down the houses of two members of the government who opposed women having the vote.

  2. Did Democracy Survive in Britain in the 1930's as a Result of the Policies ...

    It ended up a clash between the police, overseeing a lawful march by the British Union of Fascists, on one side and anti-fascists including local Jewish, socialist, and communist groups on the other. The majority of all groups into the area for the purpose of causing a riot.

  1. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    In 1858 negotiations between Cavour and Napoleon resulted in the Plombieres Agreement that became crucial for unification.

  2. What tactics do US pressure groups use, and why are some more successful than ...

    They can also target the executive branch and the judicial branch. Several US presidents have been accused of having close associations with interest groups. However, this is not completely true. This is because interest groups seek to establish close ties with sections of the federal bureaucracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work