Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

How successful was Peel's ministry of 1841-1846.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

How successful was Peel's ministry of 1841-1846 Within Peel's second ministry there were many difficulties. This included pressure groups, such as the Anti Corn Law League and significant leaders such as O'Connell. There were also problems with the party such as the backbenchers. However, there were some success, which included the budgetary policy and social policy. Reforms were Peel's main success in his second ministry, even though some led to divisions in his party. When Peel became Prime Minister he brought about many changes, such as the 'Condition of England' question, political reform and the repeal of the Corn Laws. However, Peel was elected to create no changes in the political system or the established rights of the Church of England. Hence, when he became Prime Minister he turned his back on this. Peel was trying to solve the problems created by the Whig government as well as balancing out what the party said. However, Peel was a man that moved with the times. For example, Sir Robert Peel made a variety of reforms in Irish policies. This included religious reforms. This included the Maynooth Grant increase and the Charitable Banquet Act. The 1845 Maynooth Grant increased to $26,000 a year and a building grant of $30000. This was a success. The Charitable Bequests Act encouraged private bequests and endowments to the Catholic Church.

Middle

This Act outlawed underground work for women, girls and boys under 10 (rather than Ashley's original proposal of 13). Graham's Factory Bill of 1843 was dropped following Nonconformist opposition to the leading role given to the Anglican clergy in the proposed schools. The bill attempted to regulate hours of work for children, and to provide them with schooling. Finally, both Peel and Graham accepted orthodox political economy and sympathised with the mill owners' case. Peel believed that prosperity was the best way to remove social problems, not legislation. Finally, Business confidence and regulation was another success for Peel. This included three major acts. This included; the Bank Charter Act of 1844, the Companies Act of 1844 and the Railways Act of 1844. The Bank Charter Act aimed to increase confidence in the banking system by giving grater control over bank note issue, the Companies Act set out to regulate and control 'reckless speculation'. The Railways Act increased government powers of regulation an inspection and protected the interests of pooper trailers. One of Peel's responsibilities as Prime Minster was to explain and defend his policy in the House of Commons. While Peel tried to repeal the Corn Laws, he failed to do this, because he did not argue enough why he wanted this. Corn Laws and Maynooth was his biggest political blunders.

Conclusion

As a result, Peel ignored his backbenchers and got full support from the cabinet. For example Maynooth grant increase of 1845. Even though this reform was successful, it brought Peel down as many Party members had been elected in 1841 to protect the Church of England form further attack. This is because their government was now preparing to offer Roman Catholicism in Ireland. Rebel backbenchers rejected the worldly Conservative arguments that justified the policy. This because they felt betrayed. Peel could not poise with religion with foreign matter without being punished. There are two finial reasons why the backbenchers were resentful. One was that many of Peel's backbenchers held a very different view on the role of the role of government, and did not feel that his polices were 'Conservative' at all. The second reason was that they would be 'followers in drill'. These feeling were shown during the 1844 session with its controversies over factory reform and alteration of sugar duties. To conclude Peel's second ministry it was successful in the sense, Peel helped the nation. However, this was not enough to survive as party leader. Peel had listened to his party members he may have survived. This is because it would have stopped the resentment from growing. Also after 1841 he was seen as much of an opportunist. This widened the gap between leader and party. It also that Peel very much believed that nation came before party and hence, led to his downfall. Anjna Galliara 12K Page 1 of 3

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    the corn laws proves this but also the abolition of income tax in 1816 was a measure which benefited the rich but, because it led to a large increase in indirect taxes on tea, sugar, tobacco, beer and salt, which was harmful to the poor.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    servants which revealed widespread concern that the need to tell long-term Ministers what they wanted to hear has politicised the service beyond recognition. Of those responding to the Survey, 73 per cent say Conservative ideology has 'now become part of the Civil Service culture', while one in 10 say they

  1. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    Elementul religios este unul dintre pilonii de sustinere al comportamentului social, un element ce instituie reguli, ierarhii si chiar institutii menite de a proteja anumite doctrine sau legi cu referiri religioase. În multe dintre cazuri putina libertate religioasa prezenta în diferite tari ale continentului european se datora unor scriitori formatori

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    This meant that the economy wouldn't be over run with paper money and deprecation would occur. The main economic policy that damaged his reputation within the party was the move towards free trade. Many of the conservative peers wanted to protect the British agriculture and industry and the idea of

  1. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    Heavy blame can be placed on Peel not only on the single issue of repeal but also on most other major issues that led to the split of the Conservative party (however these will be addressed later). The most obvious reason blame can be placed on Peel is because it

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    Manchester, but their living was being earned for them by the ploughman on the stepppes and the peasant craftsman in the forests. It is not surprising that one of the great themes of 19th century Russian literature is the superficiality of town life in an essentially peasant land.

  1. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    more effective to concentrate on getting an MP elected into the commons as the anti-corn league did.

  2. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    Irish for 'Not bringing up their children in habits of frugality, which qualify them for earning their own living and sending them forth into the world to look for employment' they blamed the Irish for their heavy reliance on the potato as the staple diet, without recognising the economic necessities

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.