• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How true is it to say that during the period, 1875-1986, continuity is more important than change for an understanding of Spanish history?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How true is it to say that during the period, 1875-1986, continuity is more important than change for an understanding of Spanish history? In 1875 there were significant instabilities in Spain, including the conflict between the Conservatives and the Liberals dating back to the early 19th century. The military played an important role, as whenever there were political weaknesses in the organisation of the state there was always an opportunity for military intervention. By the early twentieth century it was far too large and expensive for Spain's diminished world role and was top heavy with officers. However, it was almost impossible for governments to reduce, reform or disregard it, the army represented Spain's former greatness. It was also a Spanish tradition for generals and other officers to take political initiatives and establish pronunciamentos. Spain's economy was predominately agricultural and more than half the population were employed worked on the land. There were considerable differences in the quality of the land and the efficiency of agricultural across Spain. Areas such as Valencia showed diversification in crop production, others, such as parts of Andalusia, relied on a single crop economy. ...read more.

Middle

UGT however his aim of creating political stability and the modernisation of the infrastructure failed due to lack of funding and corruption scandals. By failing to appease key opposition groups Primo's dictatorship came to an end when he realised he was more of a liability to the country. Primo's dictatorship demonstrates clearly all the divisive factors in Spain: regional resistance, conservative hostility to change, the existence of anarchists groups, the impact of Socialism, resistance to economic change. Above all the power of the Army was still apparent. The 1923 pronunciamento can be seen as a major turning point as it opened up a search for legitimate government that lasted half a century. Had a democratic constitution been restored in 1930, the monarchy might have just survived, but by 1931 it was too late. Support for a republic was increasing. The King left Spain suspending 'the use of his prerogative' instead of abdicating outright. The army refused to support Alfonso and the transition of power from monarchy to Republic was thus speedy and relatively smooth. The Left Republic, headed by Azana, brought about many different reforms. The Socialists became the single largest party. ...read more.

Conclusion

By early 1950s Spain was accepted back into the UN and hostility ended this opening to the world unleashed social and economic change, which drew Spain closer to Western Europe. Spain's growing prosperity did not end social and political unrest and many strikes were continuing during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Franco died in 1975 and so this year can be seen as a turning point as an era had ended and many Spaniards had known no other leader. From 1975-1986 Spain saw the transition to democracy. The new constitution effectively reversed the movement toward political centralization begun by Ferdinand and Isabella in the 15th Century, and Spain began to redefine itself as a nation of autonomous communities. President Adolfo Suarez introduced important political reforms. When he surprisingly dismissed in 1981, a group of militias tried to take the power with a coup, but failed. In 1982 the socialist party won the elections and Felipe Gonzalez became president of the government. Spain became member of the NATO in 1985 and entered the European Community in 1986. However, significant social issues remained unresolved. Suggesting that the post 1975 transition of democracy wasn't very different to the period before 1923, and continuity is more important than change for an understanding of Spanish history. {1509} Part B. Modern Spain 1875-1986. Coursework 2002/03 Elise Thami A Level ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful were Ferdinand and Isabella in laying the foundations of Spain's Golden Age?

    Henry Kamen comments on how their travels participated directly in the government of their subjects. Ferdinand's control of the military orders in Castile was a success as it helped increase its Crown considerably from the nobles who accepted the rule of the two monarchs.

  2. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    member of the central relief committee of the Society of Friends wrote: "It is evident that some landlords, forgetful of the claims of humanity and regardless of the public welfare, are availing themselves of the present calamity to effect a wholesale clearance of their estates" The Limerick and Clare Examiner

  1. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    level of Palestinian terrorism by 90 percent (http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=22&x_article=1243).This statistics shows that terrorism was reduced during the time the wall was being built. However, the wall does give Palestinians a specific area to live in leading to the restraint of freedom of movement and every human has the right to freedom.

  2. Describe the Stages in Which Germany Changed From an Authoritarian to a Democratic Republic ...

    On the 10th November General Groener and Ebert agreed to a secret deal. In return for the government promising to maintain the authority of the existing officers, the army would defend the new government. This agreement upset the USPD who withdrew from the government.

  1. Alexander, a True Liberator

    Such argument is unfair, and for the most part, unfound. In the words of historian Morris, "there is little in his life to suggest that he was cynical or Machiavellian" (55). In fact, crucial historic evidence indicates that this Czar was actually intellectually lazy.

  2. How did the reforms of the constitutional assembly change France?

    Also the tax rolls were based on the estates of the ancien regime. One good thing that can with the reforms for the lower classes was the fact that most of the taxation fell on the producers rather than the consumer which most of the poor were.

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    Under growing pressure and increasingly isolated internationally, the Government embarked on a dual strategy, introducing limited reform coupled with intensifying repression and arming of society, with the objective of containing the pressures and increasing its support base while crushing organised resistance.

  2. How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

    He was also unwilling to place control of more than one small aspect of business in the hands of one man, relying heavily on two competing State secretaries and his personal secretaries such as Vasquez (1571-1593). This was coupled with an almost pathological suspicion of even his most able and faithful servants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work