• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways did the British government attempt to hidethe effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain?

Extracts from this document...


Mikhael HISTORY Boukraa In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain? During the Blitz the British government were intent on keeping morale high. They feared that the bombing of cities might entail mass depression and result in mutinies and riots. To overcome this problem they used the media and all sorts of propaganda to hide certain truths. The government felt it necessary to censor some of the British newspapers. About four in five men and two out of three women were reading a newspaper every day. This meant that the national press had a lot of power over Britons. Publishing an article explaining how Britain has no hope of winning the war or portraying miserable, weak civilians would sway national morale enormously. On the other hand, censorship had to be very delicate, the government did not want to be seen as infringing or undermining freedom of speech. After all they were fighting for the defence of democracy, against totalitarianism. The press were asked to soften the bad news and emphasis the good news. They would try to portray a bad situation in the most positive light possible, but without lying to the readers. ...read more.


This would surely have not demoralized its readers, everyone is allowed to criticise the government. But the prime minister did not like these attacks on the government and sent a formal note of warning to the paper. If it did not cease to print these pejorative articles, the paper would have to be shut down. Churchill did have reason to be worried about the paper; it was a national paper and had a circulation of about 1.9 million. It was also the paper of the citizen soldier, providing a voice for the massed ranks of conscripts through readers' letters and a forces column. Churchill must have thought that if this paper was influencing so many of the British people and blaming the government and military officials for a number of blunders, these people would be discontent with the government. Soldiers might disagree with the officials' decisions and in all this could damage the war effort. What the government did control was the BBC. During the war, television was no longer broadcast but the radio was kept going. The MOI and the BBC worked well together and cooperated closely. Ministers had final authority over broadcasting policy and controlled the amount of political statements and news coverage aired. ...read more.


Most of the films were made to build up national morale; they told stories of soldiers and their families fighting through hardships, for example "Henry V". The news they showed was selective and never showed anything that could demoralise the viewers. It would show the war from the MOI's point of view which might not necessarily be the whole truth. The MOI's short films were far less popular as the people didn't want to listen to the ceaseless stream of propaganda, advice and instructions. Many liked the documentaries shown. These were films shot at the battlefield reporting first hand the progress of the war effort such as "Christmas under fire" and "Britain can take it". The government did not only use the media to hide the effects of the Blitz from its people, volunteers were recruited following bombings to remove debris, rubble and dead bodies from sight. Services were restored as quickly as possible so people could go about their lives as usual. In conclusion, the government tried to bend and hide the full impact of the Blitz using many different methods, mainly the press, the radio and cinema. They tried not to lie to their people but used 'white lies to hide certain truths. But all of this was done for the benefit of the country and the British war effort. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    The state refused to do anything in terms of economic protectionism, arguing that they had just spent ten painful years campaigning for the lifting of protection on corn. Were they to throw that away because the Irish were hungry? It was only the potato crop that had failed in Ireland:

  2. 'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?'

    Hence, by gathering all of the policies and acts above, which targeted all areas and problems in British society at the time, the British Government had abandoned the policy of laissez-faire to a certain extent However, the introduction of a welfare state and state intervention, with the abandonment of laissez-faire has not occurred wholly.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragettes and the Suffragists were ...

    into power in 1906, there was great pressure on Fawcett to officially align the themselves with the Labour party because it was felt that they were the only party that they could now turn to as the Conservatives would be unsympathetic.

  2. Did Democracy Survive in Britain in the 1930's as a Result of the Policies ...

    was only done in such small areas, it did not really affect many people. Also the National Government was re-elected at the 1935 General Election under Baldwin. The following year, Keynes published his 'General Theory' on how the economy should constructed, how this was rejected by the Government, who opted for the Conservative approach of letting it sort it's self.

  1. In what ways did the British government attempt to change the government of India ...

    The Executive council also included the viceroy himself. The commander-in-chief of the army and 6 representatives of which 3 were Indian. The Indian representatives were to be called the transferred ministries and overlook agriculture, education and health. The Executive Council was to have 3 reserved ministers who were to look after defence, foreign policies, tax, law and order.

  2. In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the ...

    This was all possible through constant advertising propaganda. Diaries show how much impact propaganda had on the citizens of Britain 'Never before, the field of human conflict, has so much been owed by so many to so few' this quote referrers to the victory of the Battle of Britain and clearly shows how much impact censorship and propaganda has effected this British citizen.

  1. In what ways did the government attempt to hide the effects of the blitz ...

    had been issued with one at the start of the war and at the time it would have been considered hi-tech. So in conclusion the British Government used two main techniques in order to try and hide the effects of the Blitz from the British people, these were censorship and propaganda.

  2. In what ways did the government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz ...

    The older people such as teenagers and mothers were not the only ones affected by the war, so were the young children. The government knew this and designed a programme on the television which was called 'Children's Hour'. It was a programme with funny characters to help the children forget about the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work