• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways did the British government attempt to hidethe effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain?

Extracts from this document...


Mikhael HISTORY Boukraa In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain? During the Blitz the British government were intent on keeping morale high. They feared that the bombing of cities might entail mass depression and result in mutinies and riots. To overcome this problem they used the media and all sorts of propaganda to hide certain truths. The government felt it necessary to censor some of the British newspapers. About four in five men and two out of three women were reading a newspaper every day. This meant that the national press had a lot of power over Britons. Publishing an article explaining how Britain has no hope of winning the war or portraying miserable, weak civilians would sway national morale enormously. On the other hand, censorship had to be very delicate, the government did not want to be seen as infringing or undermining freedom of speech. After all they were fighting for the defence of democracy, against totalitarianism. The press were asked to soften the bad news and emphasis the good news. They would try to portray a bad situation in the most positive light possible, but without lying to the readers. ...read more.


This would surely have not demoralized its readers, everyone is allowed to criticise the government. But the prime minister did not like these attacks on the government and sent a formal note of warning to the paper. If it did not cease to print these pejorative articles, the paper would have to be shut down. Churchill did have reason to be worried about the paper; it was a national paper and had a circulation of about 1.9 million. It was also the paper of the citizen soldier, providing a voice for the massed ranks of conscripts through readers' letters and a forces column. Churchill must have thought that if this paper was influencing so many of the British people and blaming the government and military officials for a number of blunders, these people would be discontent with the government. Soldiers might disagree with the officials' decisions and in all this could damage the war effort. What the government did control was the BBC. During the war, television was no longer broadcast but the radio was kept going. The MOI and the BBC worked well together and cooperated closely. Ministers had final authority over broadcasting policy and controlled the amount of political statements and news coverage aired. ...read more.


Most of the films were made to build up national morale; they told stories of soldiers and their families fighting through hardships, for example "Henry V". The news they showed was selective and never showed anything that could demoralise the viewers. It would show the war from the MOI's point of view which might not necessarily be the whole truth. The MOI's short films were far less popular as the people didn't want to listen to the ceaseless stream of propaganda, advice and instructions. Many liked the documentaries shown. These were films shot at the battlefield reporting first hand the progress of the war effort such as "Christmas under fire" and "Britain can take it". The government did not only use the media to hide the effects of the Blitz from its people, volunteers were recruited following bombings to remove debris, rubble and dead bodies from sight. Services were restored as quickly as possible so people could go about their lives as usual. In conclusion, the government tried to bend and hide the full impact of the Blitz using many different methods, mainly the press, the radio and cinema. They tried not to lie to their people but used 'white lies to hide certain truths. But all of this was done for the benefit of the country and the British war effort. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    - out of which the modern Labour Party would eventually emerge. Though its birth did have its problems, the LRC was successful in returning Keir Hardie to Westminster in 1900. The 1906 General Election was a great success. A grand total of twenty-nine socialist MPs had been returned to Westminster.

  2. Did Democracy Survive in Britain in the 1930's as a Result of the Policies ...

    off the needed support to win power, but they still stood 80 candidates up for the election, of which none were successful. People did not wish to support the B.U.F. due to what was happening with Hitler and the Nazis, and that the National Government was dealing with the problems it faced well enough.

  1. 'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?'

    Others recognised that there was a major damage to health through long working hours and the working conditions, and so after 1908 the government introduced various state intervention policies to help those who were employed to have improved standards and in 1908 the working day for a coal miner was

  2. How do the writers attempt to influence the reader and why do you think ...

    The picture on the leaflet is of an innocent Indian girl and the writer is trying to persuade the readers that they have to do something to save an ancient culture by saving forests. The writer then gives several other reasons to save the forests other than saving the Indian community from being killed by timber cutters.

  1. The British government was attempting to hide the real effect of the Blitz on ...

    One of the most famous was 'It's that man again' which poked fun at Hitler. These programs helped to show people the brighter side of life and almost certainly boosted morale. As well as entertainment broadcasts, there were also victorious and high spirited speeches to the general public.

  2. In what ways did the government attempt to hide the effects of the blitz ...

    had been issued with one at the start of the war and at the time it would have been considered hi-tech. So in conclusion the British Government used two main techniques in order to try and hide the effects of the Blitz from the British people, these were censorship and propaganda.

  1. The Belfast Blitz.

    Water could not be hidden from their attackers, and so the city could easily be identified. After the April raids, in an attempt to prevent such disastrous results again, action was taken to help disguise the Stormont estate, in the form of covering the Parliament Buildings with layers of pitch.

  2. Explain why the government was concerned about the morale (spirit and attitude) of the ...

    The government did not want this to happen, because if the people left the cities there would be no one to work in the factories or workhouses. So in turn the government made every effort to keep the spirits up, believing a happy worker is a better worker.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work