• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Britain Racist? Discuss with reference to government & popular responses to post-war immigration.

Extracts from this document...


Essay Title Is Britain Racist? Discuss with reference to government & popular responses to post-war immigration. Word Count 1,435 Name Justin Kennedy-Lunde Matriculation Number 025552449 Subject Politics 1st MA Lecturer: Susan Isherwood Is Britain Racist? Discuss with reference to government & popular responses to post-war immigration. Britain emerged from the Second World War with a labour shortage. In 1944 a Royal Commission was established to assess the population of Great Britain. The commission returned its findings in 1949 recommending that extra labour was needed. The "European Volunteer Workers Scheme" was introduced. Its aim was to entice workers from Europe to come to Britain. Between 1947 and 1948 17,000 workers came to Britain under the scheme. However the Irish were the largest ethnic group the time, followed by continental Europeans. Blacks only made up 5% of the 17,000 who came, although they were more conspicuous by the colour of their skin and also the language and cultural differences. Yet still there was tension amongst the population with race riots. In Notting Hill in 1958 race riots went on for five nights over an August bank holiday weekend. There were also severe riots in Nottingham in the same year. In the 1950s Britain had used informal immigration control methods as the government was desperate to maintain good relations with Commonwealth countries. ...read more.


There was also a marked increase in what is now known as "Hate Crimes" perpetrated by white youths on the black population. Political parties also sensed the public mood regarding immigration and racism and were quick to find that this could help them in elections. The most blatant and disturbing of all examples was in the 1964 Smethwick by-elections where a traditionally safe Labour seat was won by a Conservative MP with the election slogan "If you want a nigger for a neighbour vote Labour". This was a decisive sign of racism, more than the hate crimes and riots. This was an election and by definition; a representative majority made its views known. The Conservatives played on public paranoia and xenophobia and used it to gain themselves an extra 40 points in opinion polls between 1966 and 1970 while Labour appeared soft on the immigration issue. Enoch Powel, an MP during the 1960's, was vehemently opposed to the influx of Jamaicans into Britain. His reasoning was that he wanted to ensure the survival of the British way of life. He was swiftly dispatched from his position in the shadow cabinet for comments such as "rivers of blood" would flow from the racial violence caused by black immigrants. ...read more.


he was a member of the shadow cabinet, the opposition party's proposed replacement for government if they win a general election. As to whether or not Britain is racist in comparison to other countries is a separate question. Germany had the persecution of the Jews, Gypsies, and any other minority group that wasn't blond haired and blue eyed under the Nazis, so pre-war; they really set the bar as to levels of racism. France had a similar post-war labour shortage as Britain and turned to its former colonies to fill the gaps in the economy. As a result, France still has major issues regarding racism to this day as indicated by Jean Marie Le Pen's second place in the first round of the French presidential elections. This caused shock waves around Europe but France wasn't the first country to show its far right leanings. Joerg Haider's Freedom Party shares power in government in Austria. And last but not least, who can forget the British National Party winning 5 council seats in local elections. It has been argued that the BNP is picking up disenfranchised far right, traditionally Conservative voters but the parties xenophobic views are still being chosen at the ballot box. Britain was previously an overtly racist country but now seems like a country struggling to reconcile its right wing tendencies with a more modern and accepting outlook as reflected in modern racial equality and discrimination laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why Did the Post-war Consensus Breakdown?

    The idea that inflation spiralled out of control in the 70's is an exaggeration. Those on the New Right believed that defeating inflation should be the government's priority rather than maintaining full employment. The second theme was that public spending in the 1970's led to a balance of payments crisis which also hastened Britain's economic decline.

  2. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    a strong pressure group, however, they are excluded from the policy process from the initiating stage of this policy. The decision makers never consider the interest of non-local residents. This policy is made by Police, Department of Labor, and Ministry of Personnel.

  1. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    In 1950 the Schuman Plan proposed that the coal and steel industries in Western Europe were pooled together but the British government did not join. This attitude continued during the next three Conservative governments, the 1951-55 and 1955-59 governments refused to take part in negotiations for the European Defence Community,

  2. What immigration policy should Britain have?

    The borders are also very expensive to run so by opening the borders would stop wasteful, very costly policing borders. This would also mean that they don't have to take time consuming processing and legal proceedings that are a result of processing refugee applications.

  1. Is immigration good or bad.

    This illustrates how the aims that people set for themselves puts them in a different circumstance the higher their expectations the harder they would have to work. Also according to the BBC News article immigrants give up their comfort to arrive to the U.K.

  2. Multicultural Britain

    This made it harder to find residence and they had to settle for areas with high rent and terrible living conditions. In 1962, the majority of cities still had 'black' areas that were separated from 'white' areas. It was like an unauthorized apartheid.

  1. The Word 'Hacker' To the popular press, "hacker" means someone who breaks into ...

    The fake version is not merely annoying; the prickly attitude of these posers can actually slow the process of innovation. But even factoring in their annoying eccentricities, the disobedient attitude of hackers is a net win. I wish its advantages were better understood.

  2. After World War II, Australia launched a massive immigration program, believing that having narrowly ...

    This was the Free and Assister Passage Agreements program. By June 1969, over 40% of the people who migrated to Australia were Anglo-Saxon, this was mainly due to Arthur Calwells influence on the Australia public. Calwell, the first immigration minister, believed that Australia should focos on attracting British people to live in Australia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work