• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Devolution Likely To Invigorate Celtic Nationalisms and Lead To the Break-Up of Britain?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IS DEVOLUTION LIKELY TO INVIGORATE CELTIC NATIONALISMS AND LEAD TO THE BREAK-UP OF BRITAIN? A government document confidently assured in July 1997: "the Union will be strengthened by recognising the claims of Scotland, Wales and the regions with strong identities of their own. The governments' devolution proposals... will not only safeguard but also endorse the Union". However could such an assertion reside as a gross political and constitutional miscalculation: does devolution represent the first step towards a British quasi-federalist state and an eventual break up of the Union; or conversely will it serve to smother Celtic nationalisms by accommodating the UK's divergent political demands in different parts of the country? Devolution is the devolving of political decision-making power from the centre to sub-national units. At least in theory, there is no loss of sovereignty at the centre in political devolution; for powers that are devolved can be repealed by an Act of Parliament. Therefore devolution does not stand synonymous with independence. ...read more.

Middle

With Westminster all but ceasing to legislate for Scotland, this will be accompanied by a removal of ministerial responsibility in Whitehall for Scottish affairs. Therefore, with Westminster no longer debating Scottish issues, it is only in constitutional theory alone that full legislative power remains with Westminster; thus characterising the new relationship between the two states as quasi-federal and only unitary during times of crisis. Westminster will reside as power only able to supervise another legislative body making laws on a wide range of issues. In addition, it will not be easy for Westminster to abolish the Scottish parliament without a national referendum or for it to unilaterally alter the devolution settlement to Scotland's disadvantage, as it would logistically have to seek the consent of the Scottish Parliament. Therefore Westminster will no longer retain the fundamental characteristic of a sovereign parliament: the right to make any law it wishes. Although culturally distinct, Wales has never been a separate integrated political unit - an incorporated part of the Union for far longer than Scotland and Northern Ireland. ...read more.

Conclusion

Celtic nationalism is largely based on political rather than economic grievances. While many nationalists complain that Scotland and Wales do not appropriate a large enough share of Westminster's coffers; it is common knowledge that, especially in the case of Scotland, funding per capita is much greater than the English national average. The Scots and to a lesser extent, the Welsh have been campaigning for political devolution ever since the matter resurfaced in the 1960s in order to partially eliminate the democratic deficit of quango control and the prospect of Scots being governed by a party they do support in the majority. Self-government therefore in the eyes of many, can only serve to diminish the basis for expressing such grievances in terms of protest votes for nationalists The likely impact of devolution is hard to assess. The potential benefits of change can certainly be overstated. The possible downside of constitutional change can also be exaggerated. The apocalyptic view, which sees an irrevocable fragmentation of the UK, ignores the fact that Britain has changed its territorial arrangements at many times in its history without disintegrating. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the devolution process in Scotland and Wales?

    Since issues involving Scotland alone can now be dealt with by the Scottish Parliament it has reduced the workload of the British Parliament thus making the introduction of any legislation much more efficient for the whole of the UK. Scotland and Wales have been able to introduce new policies in order to do what is best for their people.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Therefore there is no single 'best' system: these arguments represent irresolvable value conflicts. For societies which are riven by deep-rooted ethnic, religious or ethnic divisions, like Mali, Russia or Israel, the proportional system may prove more inclusive (Lijphart 1977), but it may also reinforce rather than ameliorate these cleavages (Tsebelis 1990).

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    However, regional development agencies were granted only a modest budget, less than �1 billion between all eight of them. Pro-devolutionists were slightly defeated by this although they were later granted extra funding in 2003. Many believe the RDAs are a significant way forward in proposing an English Parliament, towards a more quasi-federal Britain.

  2. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    The Scottish media face two ways, like other Scottish institutions. On the one hand, much of their comment and reporting is of British affairs, which differs little from the London based media. However, their location and particular audience mean that they have a particular interest in Scottish affairs, which then tend to get defined as news.

  1. Where Does Power Reside In Britain?

    The poorer people (working class) have no power, and as long as they have no money they will have no power. However it is said that if the working class realise that they are being exploited by the middle class, then there could be a revolution, where the proletariats have power over the bourgeoisie.

  2. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    amount of immigrants, ethnically similar to the french population, didnot garantuee an harmonious coorelation. Although it didn't result in a colour based racism, post war immigration did give reason to a series of new stereotypes and discriminations. At their arrival foreigners discovered a very distinct society, ruled by modernistic and capitalistic values.

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the National Lottery since its inception on the arts ...

    The management of the National Lottery Distribution Fund has come under scrutiny this past year who believe that the high levels of finance in the fund has been caused by inefficient management and an overcomplicated application procedure. The changes made in the National Lottery Act 1998 partly improved this due

  2. To what extent is the policy process in Britain open and democratic?

    Policy implementation is the stages and method of how the finished policy is actually implemented. The most important area for new policy development, as the senior branch of the Executive, is the Cabinet. Whilst policy ideas may initially stem from anywhere, if it's going to blossom and grow, a policy idea must first take root in a Cabinet member's mind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work