• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the Supreme Court a Political or Judical institution?

Extracts from this document...


The Supreme Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation, for all cases and controversies arising under the constitution or laws of the US. The court is charged with ensuring the American people with the promise of equal justice under the law and interprets the constitution which many have seen as vague. However, many people have criticised the Supreme court and claimed that is it a political institution, not a judicial institution. They believe that the court is an 'imperial judiciary', and the Supreme Court is exercising the powers that the Founding Fathers reserved with the elected branches of government. This essay discusses the claim whether or not the SC is a political institution. Political Institution. ...read more.


Under the 9th Amendment, the SC also has the power to create new constitutional rights, hence furthering the argument that they're a political institution. An example of this is the creation of the right of privacy for women in the case Roe vs. Wade, one of the most controversial issues the Court has had to make a deal with. The SC made it legal for women to have abortions within the first trimester. The court changed many of the state laws regarding abortion. 4) Another argument put forward supporting the claim the SC plays a major role in American politics, was when they determined the outcome of 2000 presidential elections between Bush vs. Gore. Controversy over the counting of votes in Florida, meant the SC resolved the problem. ...read more.


For example, Nixon and Reagan tried to change the direction of the SC's decisions by appointing conservatives. Also, judges are often politicians before they're judges. Judicial 1) Their powers are often over estimated, and it is indeed a court. They are indeed limited to constraint son their power (see other sheet-constrains on power). 2) A case in 2005 shows the ability of the SC to set aside their personal views and controversial issues and reach a decision based on strict judicial criteria. -Rumsfield vs. Forum of Academic and Institutional Rights, the court ruled universities could lose all federal funding if they refused to allow military recruiters on campus on the grounds that gay men and women are banned from joining. While over 5'000 amendments have been proposed; only 27 have been amended. SC limited role. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    Many critics argue that government has been too occupied with the wellbeing of criminals rather than the wellbeing of victims. Some say that embracing the human rights ethos encourages crime. For example, it is the view of the former chair of the Gauteng legislature's standing committee on safety and security,

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Of course again the pattern was not linear, (see Diagram 4) and more women were elected in some majoritarian systems like Canada than in other countries like Israel using highly proportional systems. The cultural context, and especially the process of recruitment within parties strongly influences the opportunities for women in elected office (Lovenduski and Norris 1993).

  1. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    Pakistan has always claimed Kashmir as its integral part. So when Musharraf came in power, government of India avoided any contacts with the new military regime. Indian establishment has always considered Musharraf as the chief architect of the Kargil war of 1999.

  2. Dmowski VS. Pilsudski

    The Peasant movement (PSL) was founded at Rzeszow in 1895. It represented all the peasants and thereby it was the most numerous party, they often couldn't agree among themselves though and thereby the party was weakened. The fourth party was the Christian Democratic Movement, which proposed a blend of Catholic philosophy and social action.

  1. Albert Arnold Gore.

    He received therapy and quickly recovered and built up a courageous and fearless mentality. Having a job in government means having a full time commitment to making contributions to society. Al Gore has definitely made many contributions to society. During Al Gore's time in the House of Representatives he addressed the subject that had always interested him -the environment.

  2. British Political Direction

    In consensus regimes, a wider variety of interests are better represented because it employs proportional representation. Although no single party has a majority, the cleavages that define this society are reproduced in that each differing interest is represented proportionally to its numbers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work