• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lord Grey, writing the British Gazzette in May 1926, said of the General Strike, that 'It is an attempted revolution'. How far do the events of the summer of 1926, and subsequent actions of the government and unions, support this view?

Extracts from this document...


Lord Grey, writing the British Gazzette in May 1926, said of the General Strike, that 'It is an attempted revolution'. How far do the events of the summer of 1926, and subsequent actions of the government and unions, support this view? The General Strike of May 1926 was the biggest industrial stoppage in British history. This showdown between the TUC and the British Government was presented by the latter as a trial of strength between the representatives of free democracy and revolutionary bully-boys. However, even though the tactics of the General Strike were intended to intimidate the government, in no way could they be viewed as revolutionary that is, a coordinated attempt to overthrow the British government and replace it with a socialist workers' state. The leaders of the strike, the TUC, were at constant pains to stress that their aims were industrial, not political, and certainly not revolutionary, despite what the government propaganda said. ...read more.


It clearly suited the government to present the strikers as potential revolutionaries to win the propaganda war while the Strike was in progress. Through the British Gazette the government accused the strikers of attempting to challenge the British constitution. Strikers were portrayed under a negative light to reduce support on their side. The government wanted to make it obvious that their actions were wring and illegal thus making the strikers feel guilty. On their side, the strikers responded to the government's accusations through the British worker where they repeatedly removed themselves from any protests made in their regards by saying that the aim of the strike was to merely defend just issues of the miners only. Although there was much anger with the TUC leaders handling of the strike, there is almost no evidence of revolutionary intent among British workers in the country at large. ...read more.


However, as time passed and the government's propaganda was showing their actions as revolutionary they began to feel concerned and worried that the chances that violence may flare up thus passing initiative to the revolutionary leaders. Their strike was often compared to the Russian Revolution which did not at all reflect the moderate aims of the British workers. In the years after the Strike, there was no political manifestation of frustrated revolutionary socialism. The Union movement actually making more moderate. Fewer strikes were called. The Labour Party continued to stress its slow, reformist democratic path to building socialism. In reality, the British working class remained relatively conservative between the two world wars in comparison to their continental brothers. Baldwin's Conservative government was able to pass the Trades Disputes Act in 1927. This act effectively made another attempt at a General Strike illegal and put the Unions firmly back in their place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 fail?

    By using the Law on their side the Government did perhaps also have another advantage over the miners. Of the 9,000 people arrested during the strike a large number were arrested for printing or distributing strike bulletins - once again preventing strikers from using propaganda (although they did eventually release their own paper the British Worker).

  2. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    was passed in 1919,10 The Rowlatt Acts were also passed11 shortly afterward, a highly contradictory reform which meant that progress for Indians remained limited overall (e.g. gaining the vote but at the same time losing civil liberty). Gandhi's intervention, calling for hartals in direct response to the Rowlatt bills, which

  1. The British Suffragette movement.

    But such activity failed to capture the headlines. Emmeline's eldest daughter, Christabel, decided that a more confrontational approach was necessary if women's suffrage were to become a national issue. Thus in October 1905 she initiated what is usually regarded as the first act of "militancy" when, at a Liberal Party meeting, she and Annie Kenney repeatedly asked, "Will

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 fail and what were the effects the ...

    difficulties and decided therefore that a future united action in support of the miners would take the form of a general strike. The Conservative government, however, saw its role as a neutral, standing between the contending parties and rep-resenting the British people as a whole.

  1. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    cannot be carried on the backs of a few dignitaries and influential elders. A constitutional republic which does not [allow] action of the majority of the people is a bogus republic and bogus constitutionalism...because there has been no change in the thought or the character of the majority of the

  2. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    Through studying his letters, Seaman concludes that Cavour's main aim was Piedmontisation and not the unification of Italy. Smith expresses the view that essentially unification was just a fluke under Cavour's ministry. Although, these historians views are valid, it is important not to underestimate Cavour's significance in Unification.

  1. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    led them to stay in government until 1964 when once again Labour returned to power. When they did they found Industrial relations to be poor Labour and the Unions no longer communicated on the level they once did and so the situation became problematic.

  2. 'How far had the British Government abandoned the policy of laissez-faire by 1914?'

    Furthermore, the pension scheme was insufficient and didn't target the majority of elderly people in urgent help. Finally, another major problem was that the unemployment did not cover the bulk of problems raised by those in need. The failure to fully abandon the laissez-faire ideology was also partly because of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work