• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Pakistan's Political and Economic Development

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

JPE400Y1 Prof: Dickson Eyoh Pakistan's Political and Economic Development Pakistan gained independence from British colonial rule in August 1947 to provide a better homeland to the Moslems of the Indian Sub Continent. 58 years on we have yet to see this country fulfill any of these promises. What Pakistan has witnessed is growing disparity between class structures, internal contradictions and a power struggle between the political elites and the military. Civilian and Military governments have both been responsible for such actions but looking at statistics it shows that military regimes have performed better than civilian governments. This essays looks to examine the precarious relationship between civilian and military governments, and to analyze the affect they had on political and economic development of Pakistan as a state. It looks to establish that the weak civilian governments were not beneficial economically for Pakistan; instead the military apparatus of Pakistan which works as an internal force within the setup have out performed the civilian governments economically and in providing political stability. Since independence Pakistan has been ruled by Military regimes four times. The first taste of military authoritarianism was in 1958 to 1968 under Ayub Khan as martial law administrator. He was followed by General Yahya Khan. A short period of civilian government gave way to the autocratic rule of Zia Ul Haq from 1978 to 1988 and finally President Musharaff who took over the country in a bloodless coup in 1999 over throwing the civilian government of Nawaz Sharif. The military is an essential part of the Pakistan political set up. ...read more.

Middle

The growth in the later half was even better. GDP grew at an annual rate of 6.6% from 1983 to 1988 and large scale manufacturing grew at an average rate of 16.6%.15 Zia Ul Haq had some good fortune. Pakistan benefited from external remittances from the workers in the Middle East from 1975 to 1985 and he was a close ally of the US during the Afghan War. Pakistan received assistance worth $5Billion in the 1980s making it the third largest recipient of U.S aid.16 Political structures were not changed during his time; the feudal aristocracy still exercised considerable power. This was a trend that carried forward in the next decade. With the death of Zia Pakistan entered a precarious politic situation. By 1993 the political situation of Pakistan was an unusual one. From the death of Zia in 1988 till 1993, the country had survived 5 governments, four prime ministers, three presidents, and two chiefs of army staff.17 This would clearly suggest to any reader the fragmentation of political and economic development. A strong government is essential for political and economic development and these years not surprisingly signify the worsening of economic growth and increased political instability. Benazir Bhutto assumed power for the first time in 1988. Her government ignited yet again the debate regarding the balance of power among the President and the Prime Minister. This power struggle led to the failure of her government and eventual dismal of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is evident from protecting the homeland and the constant military agreements Pakistan had entered as a U.S ally during the cold war period. The military itself was able to over throw civilian regimes with ease and establish itself as the ruling party for years. There was an inherent incapability on part of the civilian regimes to carry forward the tradition of democracy. The failures of civilian regimes automatically paved the way for the military, thus the four times military men have ruled Pakistan. The military regimes have tried to make them democratic through the constitution and gain legitimacy through the political apparatus. In conclusion it would be right to say that economic record of military regimes have done better than those of civilian government, which is evident from the economic indicators over the last 58years of independence. The democratic setup was weak at independence and constant interference by the military in policy and political matters did not allow the process of democratization, and certainly did not pave the way for steady democratic governments. The civilian governments were involved in a balance of power struggle between the Prime and President which effectively carved the way for the military to take over. These internal strife, power struggle and political instability led to poor economic management and the military was able to capitalize on these situations to provide a change, a better change. The current military government has followed the trend and shown a better economic record than the civilian governments of the 1990s. It would be wise to say military governments in Pakistan provided economic and political stability that was missing in civilian governments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    its colonies, if it could, as shown by its military campaigns to defeat insurgents in Malaya and Kenya. However the idea of keeping their colonies was to be a struggle as the balance of power has shifted. The effects of the war had seen Britain's status as an imperial power

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    di Petizione that was the only way to demand changes because no freedom of the press was permitted. The petition consisted of those liberal ideas and freedoms that the Maltese had got under the French. Sciberras wanted reforms to take place in Malta and as a result he set-up another comitato, the Comitato Generale Maltese.

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    Tagore, who questioned whether Gandhi "was not stoking the flames of narrow nationalism and even xenophobia."15 Such concerns over Gandhi's propositions for self-rule were compounded when, instead of peace prevailing as he had hoped for, there were acts of looting, arson and even murder of Englishmen.

  2. The Life and Times of Dr. Kwame Nkrumah The Road to Ghana's Colonial Independence

    Nkrumah also hoped that by using a communist system of industrialization his country would be spared some of the worst injustices he saw in the capitalistic model, such as a tiny group of people becoming very rich at the expense of an enormous group of people who were very poor.

  1. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    However the result of such is that a Latin American country with considerable media attention on public corruption could rank higher on Transparency International's list of corruption than a country with less public awareness of the amount of corruption that is going in, even though in actual fact more corruption

  2. Assess Mao's domestic policies

    Mao also insisted to the people that every act they carried out should be done with vehemence in order to demonstrate their strong revolutionary spirit, and passion for China. Disrespect was encouraged in families towards each other, and to intellectuals such as teachers as well.

  1. The colonial factor in the Nigerian civil war (1967-1970)

    Tribal- the northerners and the Igbo's had ongoing disputes. The domination of the Igbo's in the retail trade jobs in the north angered the northerners. 2) Revenge- northerners remembered the easterners as the people who killed their spiritual leader, the Sarduna of Sokoto and would thus jump at any opportunity to avenge his death.

  2. Compare and contrast the elitist and pluralist accounts of political power

    Barrie Axford et all, Politics an Introduction, 490. It seams clear that both theories would tend to agree that in large industrialised societies democracy in the traditional sense is almost impossible to achieve. On one hand pluralists would state that interests are represented by groups, rather than individuals, whom debate with others to decide policy outcomes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work