THEORETICAL ARGUMENT
Theoretically, The presidential system seems to be a better system of Government because the citizenry of the country or nation have a chance to decide on whom they want to lead them into the kind of peace and national success that they want.
EMOTIONAL ARGUMENT
Dealing with leadership of a whole nation needs the love and care of those you are governing, when the people of the land just wake up one morning and find out that they have a new leader, even if they do not like him, they have to accept with him. This, I think is unfair and unjust and that everyone should be given a chance to vote for whom they want as their leader which the presidential form of govenment provides.
BOTH SIDES OF THE ARGUMENT
PRESIDENTIAL
1. In a presidential system, the central principle is that the legislative and executive branches of government should be separate.
2 It is extremely rare for the president to have the power to directly propose laws, or cast a vote on legislation.
3. A president is highly identifiable and accountable to voters.
4. In this system, there is a greater degree of choice for voters.
5. A president shows stability and continuity of policy- making.
6. In this system, there is centralization of authority in one person.
7. Its been noticed that this system brings about majoritarianism which is associated to democratic failure.
PARLIAMENTARY
1. This system of government is inclusive of all groups within the executive unlike the presidential system.
2. There is flexibility in this government as coalitions can change without a new appraoch to election.
3. This system helps to unify the executive and legislative arms of government through checks and balances as the executive is dependent on the confidence of the legislature which helps in democratic persisitence.
4. In this system, there is possibility of executive deadlocks, stalemates and immobilism.
5. Also, there are problems of accountability as decisions are taken by the collective cabinet lack of stability in governance.
ADMINISTRATIVE ARGUMENT
Adminstratively, the parliamentary system of government seems to be a better form of government because everyone in the parliament collectively works hand in hand with the prime minister to deliver good governance to the people since they all have the same goals in mind, unlike the presidential system where there are different parties trying to work at all cost to see other parties fail, so that they can be the people's party.
Conclusively, the presidential system of governance proves to be a better form of governance as it woks with the directives of the citizenry of the country or nation through national voting and not vote of confidence.
