• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you agree? The career of Peel, according to his critics, is riddled with betrayal and treachery. On numerous occasions during this period he sacrificed the interest of his party in pursuit of what he defined as 'national interest'. These historians claim that the process started in 1829 when Peel was Home Secretary and proposed the successful Catholic emancipation Bill against the wishes of the majority of the party. This then continued when he famously remodeled the party with his Tamworth Manifesto where he was aiming to widen the base of his own parties support. While in office between 1841 - 46 Peels 'arrogance' (as Murphy puts it) led to betrayal to a number of key party principles. Firstly, in the 1842 Budget he reintroduced income tax at 7p, a direct betrayal of the 1816 measure put in place by Liverpool. Furthermore, the emphasis of tariff reform, although of the benefit to the majority, flooded the country with cheap goods that were damaging the landed interests. ...read more.

Middle

Gash believes that "what Peel gave the Conservative opposition was national leadership of a kind they were not to see again for another generation.... national leadership is often more effective than party leadership". As a leader between 1841-46, Peel's main perspective during this period was economic, after the Whigs had let it slide. He envisaged a gradual economic improvement, which would, in turn. Bring about social change, thus completing Britain's adjustment to a more industrialized society. Peels chosen method was through tariff changes, and his budgets of 1842 and 1845 completely removed duties on 600 articles and reduced duties on 500 others. Gash states that, "all in all, between 1842 and 1846, the work of transforming Britain into a free-trade country was largely accomplished, leaving only a little remnant to be done by Gladstone in 1853 and 1860". The Bank Charter Act of 1844 has generally been praised for introducing a period of financial stability by reasserting the dominance of the Bank of England. London soon became the world's leading financial centre! Meanwhile, the Companies Act of 1844 entailed the compulsory registration of companies, the issue of prospectuses and the stipulation of regular accounts. ...read more.

Conclusion

"Peel's handling of this was in many ways remarkably positive" (Lee). He had been devoted to the ridding of the Corn Laws long before the Irish Potato Famine 1845-6. Peel was convinced that if emergency actions weren't taken, then starvation would have occurred on a missive scale. However, it was clear that relief could not be taken while the Corn Laws were still in place. With little initial support from his Cabinet, he eventually won them over and struggled for 5 months to push through repeal against strong Conservative opposition, eventually emerging victorious in May 1846. Evans claims that Peel "proved himself untrue to the Tory principles on Ireland, on religion, on commerce and, finally and fatally, the landed interest itself". However, in contrast to this all his reforms were intended to uphold the basic features of Conservatism and make the aristocratic landowning faction, more popular. His policies on free trade were part of a continuous process that reached a climax with the ultimate triumph of his career, the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846. This combined with; the re-organization of the party post 1830, his 1841 election victory and his social and economical reforms, seems to indicate that Peel didn't betray his party and was without doubt a successful leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Peel was also against the government being lead by illegal acts of the rabble, and felt that the government should not be held at ransom by anyone. Like the methods they employ, the organisation of the two groups would inevitably have some bearing on their success.

  2. Was Daniel O'Connell a Great Irish National Leader?

    wanted to achieve through Parliament but this was not popular outside of Ireland. Therefore O'Connell turned his attention to reforms for Ireland and the Whigs did address some of the Irish grievances by introducing a grant for education in 1831 and by passing the Irish Church Bill they reformed the unrepresentative Church of Ireland.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Parnell as a leader of the Irish cause.

    the Phoenix Park Murders, these articles contained letters said to be written by Parnell commending the murders. In 1889, however, an investigation into the source of these letters revealed that they were forged by a journalist named Piggott. Only months later, the husband of Parnell's mistress, Captain O'Shea filed for divorce.

  2. To what extent was religion the main causeOf rebellion in the reign of Henry ...

    In Nottingham another royal force was waiting for orders. The English Government dealt with the uprising by promising to Aske and other leaders that everyone would be pardoned and that a new parliament would be set up in the north. Also Henry said that he would listen to the demands of the pilgrims.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Peel believe giving into there group was not the option and instead tried to maintain a strong police force and when the riot became to extreme he even sent on troops to quell the violence. Thought it cannot be said he did nothing to help the masses Peel did bring about some of social reform despite his parties disagreements.

  2. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    to be economically useless, so that they would not interfere with private enterprise. Workers filled valleys and flattened hills, and constructed roads in places where there was absolutely no need for them at all. Wages were so low that the worker could barely buy enough food to live themselves, and it was impossible to support their families.

  1. To what extent is British Conservatism still committed to 'the free market and the ...

    This was a new kind of conservatism because, as a basic belief of conservatism is that people are essentially selfish, the introduction of a free-market would allow people to prove themselves and become successful. However, the old was combined with the new as, almost to counter-balance this allowance for individualism,

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    In fact even the Whigs believed that Peel was one hundred percent behind sustaining the Corn Laws, this can be seen in Lord Monmouth's comment that the election of 1841 was being fought between, on one side a free trade party and on the other a protectionist one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work