• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you agree? The career of Peel, according to his critics, is riddled with betrayal and treachery. On numerous occasions during this period he sacrificed the interest of his party in pursuit of what he defined as 'national interest'. These historians claim that the process started in 1829 when Peel was Home Secretary and proposed the successful Catholic emancipation Bill against the wishes of the majority of the party. This then continued when he famously remodeled the party with his Tamworth Manifesto where he was aiming to widen the base of his own parties support. While in office between 1841 - 46 Peels 'arrogance' (as Murphy puts it) led to betrayal to a number of key party principles. Firstly, in the 1842 Budget he reintroduced income tax at 7p, a direct betrayal of the 1816 measure put in place by Liverpool. Furthermore, the emphasis of tariff reform, although of the benefit to the majority, flooded the country with cheap goods that were damaging the landed interests. ...read more.


Gash believes that "what Peel gave the Conservative opposition was national leadership of a kind they were not to see again for another generation.... national leadership is often more effective than party leadership". As a leader between 1841-46, Peel's main perspective during this period was economic, after the Whigs had let it slide. He envisaged a gradual economic improvement, which would, in turn. Bring about social change, thus completing Britain's adjustment to a more industrialized society. Peels chosen method was through tariff changes, and his budgets of 1842 and 1845 completely removed duties on 600 articles and reduced duties on 500 others. Gash states that, "all in all, between 1842 and 1846, the work of transforming Britain into a free-trade country was largely accomplished, leaving only a little remnant to be done by Gladstone in 1853 and 1860". The Bank Charter Act of 1844 has generally been praised for introducing a period of financial stability by reasserting the dominance of the Bank of England. London soon became the world's leading financial centre! Meanwhile, the Companies Act of 1844 entailed the compulsory registration of companies, the issue of prospectuses and the stipulation of regular accounts. ...read more.


"Peel's handling of this was in many ways remarkably positive" (Lee). He had been devoted to the ridding of the Corn Laws long before the Irish Potato Famine 1845-6. Peel was convinced that if emergency actions weren't taken, then starvation would have occurred on a missive scale. However, it was clear that relief could not be taken while the Corn Laws were still in place. With little initial support from his Cabinet, he eventually won them over and struggled for 5 months to push through repeal against strong Conservative opposition, eventually emerging victorious in May 1846. Evans claims that Peel "proved himself untrue to the Tory principles on Ireland, on religion, on commerce and, finally and fatally, the landed interest itself". However, in contrast to this all his reforms were intended to uphold the basic features of Conservatism and make the aristocratic landowning faction, more popular. His policies on free trade were part of a continuous process that reached a climax with the ultimate triumph of his career, the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846. This combined with; the re-organization of the party post 1830, his 1841 election victory and his social and economical reforms, seems to indicate that Peel didn't betray his party and was without doubt a successful leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Peel was also against the government being lead by illegal acts of the rabble, and felt that the government should not be held at ransom by anyone. Like the methods they employ, the organisation of the two groups would inevitably have some bearing on their success.

  2. How successful was Peel's Ministry 1841-1846?

    the working environment for workers safer, reducing fatalities where death was frequent. The '1842 Mines Act' forbade women and children under 10 to work underground, and the '1844 Factory Act' which was largely driven by Peel's home secretary, Sir James Graham, limited the hours children under 13 could work, and recommended safety improvements.

  1. To what extent was religion the main causeOf rebellion in the reign of Henry ...

    So they made a plan to capture Hull and Scarborough, however, this failed and the King now had his chance to recover control in the north. The Government and Henry declared martial law in Carlisle and 74 of the rebels were hanged.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    politically lying and pledge breaking.' Confidence in Peel was shaken so much not necessarily because he supported repeal (although of course this did play its part) but rather because of the manner in which he had seemingly committed 'treason' against his party and the pride in which he seemed to

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    The Irish Famine was a problem which would disappear once the necessary cull had taken its course. The impoverishment of the Irish was compounded by their disempowerment; in 1845 only one in eighty-three people was entitled to vote, with the Penal Laws completely disenfranchising all Catholics: It was agreed that

  2. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    He therefore emphasised the system of peerage in the House of Lords, the maintenance of law and order, the protection of the Anglican Church and the role of the monarchy. It is clear that the Tory values of protectionism and stability were maintained and that Peel had not been carried away by reform for reform's sake.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Peel believe giving into there group was not the option and instead tried to maintain a strong police force and when the riot became to extreme he even sent on troops to quell the violence. Thought it cannot be said he did nothing to help the masses Peel did bring about some of social reform despite his parties disagreements.

  2. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    Agricultural M.P.s were afraid of upsetting their constituents. In 1845 the beginning of the Irish Potato Famine gave Peel the excuse he needed. Due to the inability to repeal the Corn Laws on purely economic grounds without committing ultimate treason to his party, the crisis in Ireland together with the poor harvests in Britain served as a plausible excuse.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work