• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


Peel betrayed his party and was an unsuccessful leader'? To what extent do you agree? The career of Peel, according to his critics, is riddled with betrayal and treachery. On numerous occasions during this period he sacrificed the interest of his party in pursuit of what he defined as 'national interest'. These historians claim that the process started in 1829 when Peel was Home Secretary and proposed the successful Catholic emancipation Bill against the wishes of the majority of the party. This then continued when he famously remodeled the party with his Tamworth Manifesto where he was aiming to widen the base of his own parties support. While in office between 1841 - 46 Peels 'arrogance' (as Murphy puts it) led to betrayal to a number of key party principles. Firstly, in the 1842 Budget he reintroduced income tax at 7p, a direct betrayal of the 1816 measure put in place by Liverpool. Furthermore, the emphasis of tariff reform, although of the benefit to the majority, flooded the country with cheap goods that were damaging the landed interests. ...read more.


Gash believes that "what Peel gave the Conservative opposition was national leadership of a kind they were not to see again for another generation.... national leadership is often more effective than party leadership". As a leader between 1841-46, Peel's main perspective during this period was economic, after the Whigs had let it slide. He envisaged a gradual economic improvement, which would, in turn. Bring about social change, thus completing Britain's adjustment to a more industrialized society. Peels chosen method was through tariff changes, and his budgets of 1842 and 1845 completely removed duties on 600 articles and reduced duties on 500 others. Gash states that, "all in all, between 1842 and 1846, the work of transforming Britain into a free-trade country was largely accomplished, leaving only a little remnant to be done by Gladstone in 1853 and 1860". The Bank Charter Act of 1844 has generally been praised for introducing a period of financial stability by reasserting the dominance of the Bank of England. London soon became the world's leading financial centre! Meanwhile, the Companies Act of 1844 entailed the compulsory registration of companies, the issue of prospectuses and the stipulation of regular accounts. ...read more.


"Peel's handling of this was in many ways remarkably positive" (Lee). He had been devoted to the ridding of the Corn Laws long before the Irish Potato Famine 1845-6. Peel was convinced that if emergency actions weren't taken, then starvation would have occurred on a missive scale. However, it was clear that relief could not be taken while the Corn Laws were still in place. With little initial support from his Cabinet, he eventually won them over and struggled for 5 months to push through repeal against strong Conservative opposition, eventually emerging victorious in May 1846. Evans claims that Peel "proved himself untrue to the Tory principles on Ireland, on religion, on commerce and, finally and fatally, the landed interest itself". However, in contrast to this all his reforms were intended to uphold the basic features of Conservatism and make the aristocratic landowning faction, more popular. His policies on free trade were part of a continuous process that reached a climax with the ultimate triumph of his career, the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846. This combined with; the re-organization of the party post 1830, his 1841 election victory and his social and economical reforms, seems to indicate that Peel didn't betray his party and was without doubt a successful leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Peel's ministry of 1841-1846.

    The budgetary policy aimed to stabilise government finances. It also aimed to reduce cost of living, increase employment and remove discontent by stimulating trade and prosperity. They planned to do this by ending government on indirect taxation by re-introducing income tax, a policy discussed by the Liverpool cabinet in the 1920s.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    He did introduce a few social reforms such as the Mines Act of 1842 but most of these seem haft hearted and unaffected. The Mines act 1942 is often seen to lack certain clauses as it still allow boys from 10-16 to work in the Pitts.

  1. To what extent was religion the main causeOf rebellion in the reign of Henry ...

    Nearly all of the uprising leaders were killed, and so the Government now had control of the north again. The nobles that had supported the last two rebellions were again there for support and supplies. They included Sir Francis Bigod - who actually started it off, the Percys, Lord Darcy

  2. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Peel would have been pleased that the ACLL was not resorting to violent or disruptive methods. He also would have had to consider the issue, because he could not dismiss it as a mere issue of law and order. The Chartists used some similar methods to the Anti-Corn Law League.

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    Even so there were not enough jobs; in 1846 400,000 people applied for 13,000 jobs. Free trade insisted that the destitute work on the public works or in the Workhouses, and that hundreds of thousands should receive wages below the miserable levels prevailing, in order not to distort the labour market.

  2. Peel and the Tory party: 1829 - 1841.

    After William IV dismissed the Whig party in late 1834, Peel entered his "Hundred Days" term.

  1. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    1846 whereby restrictive tariffs were removed from British agriculture and the price of bread reduced, was the result of a long and widespread agitation fostered by Anti-Corn Law leagues in all parts of the country.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    When the Conservative government was elected to power in 1841 it was believed by most Conservative backbenchers to have been won because it and Peel pledged to maintain the Corn Laws and protect the landed class, it was the traditional Conservative doctrine.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work