• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prime Minister Paul Martin wants you to assess the extent to which Parliament has been deferring to the courts on matters relating to such politically sensitive issues as abortion and same-sex marriage.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Prime Minister Paul Martin wants you to assess the extent to which Parliament has been deferring to the courts on matters relating to such politically sensitive issues as abortion and same-sex marriage. The Prime Minister wants to know whether delegating these issues to the courts is an abrogation of Parliament's constitutional responsibilities, or whether the decision-making on these types of issues falls within the appropriate constitutional and political purview of the Canadian judicial system. Since 1982 there has been much debate about what exactly is the appropriate role of the courts in the government's political processes. With the inclusion of the Charter of Rights and Freedom into the constitution a direct result has been the increased role of the judiciary. Over the past 20 odd years or so, the courts have intervened several times in legislations passed by the House of Commons, and they have ranged in issues from abortion, Aboriginal rights, same-sex marriage, euthanasia and more. The main criticism voiced against the enhanced role of the courts contends that due to the increased deferring to the courts on controversial issues and those which could potentially result in unpopular public opinion, the legislatures are able to successfully wash their hands of these sticky situations. ...read more.

Middle

having appealed to the Supreme Court and only then intervening is an execution of the political process in its correct democratic form. By keeping to the individual roles of the judiciary and the legislature the political process enables dialogue and deliberations on legislations passed and if conflicts do arise the role of the Supreme Court is expressive of the claims and interests of the general public and minority groups and insures that they are not being neglected. There is no denying that there is a great deal of support for the new role of the judiciary's. Before the inclusion of the Charter into the constitution the general public was (and to some extent still is) dissatisfied with the unquestioned power of the Parliament and the legislatures6. Many minority groups and interest groups felt that their interests were being neglected. With the enhanced role of the judiciary these minority and interest groups have a say against the "majority of the tyranny" and a facet through which their interests and claims can be addressed and if sound the legislations passed by Parliament can be struck down. This new role of the judiciary does indeed improve the democratic element of the Canadian state, but it is imperative that this new found judicial power and authority should be exercised in the proper constitutional manner. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus deferring to courts on matters or legislations which have not been passed as yet, and on which the Parliament has not yet taken a stand, is bypassing the democratic process thus disabling accountability ,dialogue by restricting Judicial Review which is important in enabling "responsible government " to function . BIBLIOGRAPY Joseph F. Fletcher , Paul Howe " Public Opinion and the Courts " May 2000 p 52 < http://www.irpp.org/choices/archive/vol6no3.pdf> Janet L.Hiebert " From equality rights to same sex marriage - Parliament and the Courts in the age of the Charter , October 2003, < http://www.irpp.org/choices/index.htm> Janet . L. Hiebert " Wrestling with rights, Judges , Parliament and the making of Public Policy " June 1999, http://www.irpp.org/choices/archive/vol5no3.pdf Peter W , Hogg , Allison A. Thornton " The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures " April 1999 < http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/apr99/morton.pdf> F.L Morton "Dialogue or Monologue? " April 1999 < http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/apr99/morton.pdf> Mark Charlton, Paul Barker "Cross Currents: Contemporary Political Issues " Nelson Canada 1994 , 2nd Edition . 1 Janer L.Hiebert " From equality rights to same sex marriage - Parliament and the Courts in the age of the Charter , October 2003, < http://www.irpp.org/choices/index.htm> 2 ibid 3 ibid 4 inid 5 ibid 6 Joseph F. Fletcher , Paul Howe " Public Opinion and the Courts " May 2000 p 52 < http://www.irpp.org/choices/archive/vol6no3.pdf> 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent are senior British civil servants still &amp;amp;#147;anonymous, permanent and politically neutral?&amp;amp;#148; ...

    It is therefore important that there are senior civil servants with years of experience and plenty of knowledge about the departments' work, ensuring continuity and stability of administration. The principle of anonymity ensures that senior civil servants aren't publicly identified with the successes or failures of government policies.

  2. UK Written Constitutionshould the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' ...

    As Lord Hoffman suggests, the rights in the Act serve, to an extent, as 'principles of constitutionality' in a similar way to a written constitution.14 The Human Rights Act is Parliament's recognition that its legislative sovereignty is limited by constitutionally democratic principles.

  1. Nationalism as applied to business

    With the dissolution of such communities, it became possible to imagine a state in which there was now no longer "simultaneity along time" but "homogenous, empty time". This type of time could be marked by clock and calendar, and was amenable to theoretically incidental coincidence.

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    UK who would be more subject to a kind of rigid Islamization process. One of the reasons was that they faced a hostile racist attitude around them and reassertion of their Islamic identity would form the ideal defense mechanism. This study however may be very specific to the region concerned

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    Nelson Mandela was involved in the main resistance against apartheid, the African National Congress, or ANC for short. This large political group in South Africa was involved in many protests against apartheid since its formation in 1912. Mandela joined the Youth League of the ANC in 1944 but had doubts about his commitment to the party.

  2. Political accountability -Parliament and the courts

    After the statement has been made it will be followed by a response from an opposition frontbench speaker and some questions from backbench MPs. The parliamentary convention is that Parliament should be the first body to hear of an important announcement.

  1. Explain the motives of those who have sought to make language more 'politically correct' ...

    The reasoning behind this is apparent: describing a black person as a "nigger" is blatantly derogatory, and if children are brought up to use such terminology then their views of black people will most likely be in accordance with this.

  2. Comparative analysis of aboriginal as well as federal government perspective on native self-government in ...

    Nevertheless, all these models include four levels of self-government, and that is how it looks like: 1.statehood: 'absolute' sovereignty with complete independent authority over internal and external jurisdictions ------------------------------------ 2.nationhood: 'shared' sovereignty, with jurisdictional authority over internal matters of direct relevance but not over external affairs 3.municipal: 'functional' sovereignty, with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work