• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

South Africa 1945-1994: Was Nelson Mandela a Terrorist? What was the Cartoonist's View of the verdict passed on Nelson Mandela?

Extracts from this document...


South Africa 1945-1994: Was Nelson Mandela a Terrorist? Question 5: What was the Cartoonist's View of the verdict passed on Nelson Mandela? In December 1963 Nelson Mandela was tried in the Rivonia Trial. The Trial lasted until June 1964 where he was imprisoned for life narrowly avoiding being sentenced to death with seven others including Walter Sisulu, the leader of the ANC. Mandela was tried for "recruiting people for training and guerrilla warfare for the purpose of violent revolution", when the police raided the MK's headquarters and found links between Mandela and the recent sabotages on power stations. The prosecution demanded that they should all be hanged but the amount of international interest forced the judge to pass life imprisonment on them all. The arrests managed to break down the MK and the ANC inside South Africa. In Source G the cartoonist, a man named Illingworth, has depicted Nelson Mandela being tied down by one finger with a police man a court judge and Verwoerd the most powerful Nationalist party Leader standing next to him. Illingworth is trying to say that the system is not holding him down. This is because in the source Mandela's face is depicted as angry and as though the men tying him down are having no effect on him. It may also be that he is trying to say that the government think that they have felled a giant but really they are having no effect. ...read more.


In source 1, the South African journalist Ormonde Pollock says that life on Robben Island is not what people stereotype it to be, "One goes to Robben Island with a preconceived notion". He explains that "In the few hours...we never saw anyone who appeared to have been ill-treated." Pollock also explains that it was nothing like the statement that the United Nations published, saying that, "...prisoners...are accorded especially cruel". In the second source by an Australian journalist, David McNicoll, Nelson Mandela explains that Robben Island is not that bad and explains that Mandela devises his own ways of information and how it stops him from getting depressed. Mandela also explains that he knows his "cause will triumph" and he is satisfied by the way things are proceeding. The last sentence of the source reads, "I would like you to listen to some complaints" and a footnote at the bottom says that sixty-five words have been deleted. In the third source by an ex-prisoner, Neville Alexander, it explains to the others contradiction that Robben Island was "hell on earth". Alexander describes how the guards treated the prisoners and how they "would often punish the prisoners by seating them in the most disadvantageous places". The sources contradict themselves in many ways, for example, on the surface Source 1 is saying that life is not bad on Robben Island and that the idea that there are "prison staff armed with machine guns, pacing the parapets", are not true and it is just a "preconceived notion". ...read more.


As a conclusion it is obvious that on the surface, without studying them in depth the sources all contradict themselves. Source 1 says life is good, Source 2 has a neutral view but then says that life is not great and gives to sides to the argument and Source 3 says that life on Robben Island was "hell on earth", and they were not even allowed to talk to the person next to them for most of the time. But it becomes more apparent that the sources are all alike when studied in depth. In Source 1 Pollock is being almost sarcastic and pointing out the complaints and turning them in to praises and trying to make people read between the lines. Source 2 is also putting life on Robben Island into a bad perspective as the source has been censored cutting out the passage where Mandela clearly states that life on Robben Island is cruel and source 3 generally says that life was bad although this could be exaggerated to some extent because Alexander thought that it was time that people knew what really happened and to prove they were un-necessarily cruel because if they had or had not done it Mandela would still be running for election anyway. This is why the sources do not differ too much of their accounts of life on Robben Island. History South Africa Coursework Edward Mathews Source Based Questions 5 and 6 Centre No: 65129 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    This was a great turning point in Mandela's life; instead of fighting peacefully, he was building an army. If he hadn't turned to violence, he would not have been put in jail for life.

  2. How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa ...

    He was beaten so badly by the police that he went into a coma and they drove him to a hospital 1,000 km away before he died. Many thought he had been driven to a hospital too far away and he should not have been beaten up in the first place.

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    Radebe believed that the ANC was 'the vehicle for freedom for black Africans'. ANC meetings were "lively with debate and discussion about Parliament, the press laws, rents, bus fares, etc". They set themselves the formidable task of transforming the African National Congress (ANC)

  2. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    Source B says that it was the demonstrators who fired first. In conclusion, Sources C, D and E hardly support the facts stated in Source B at all. Though Source C does not go very far into challenging it either.

  1. "The ending of White minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    The ANC won 252 of the 400 seats in the national assembly. It is safe to say that Nelson Mandela played a key part in the abolishment of apartheid, although his time imprisoned shows that other important factors also must be considered to understand the full meaning of why apartheid ended.

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    1914-1918 South African troops seized a German colony in south-western Africa during World War I. South Africa occupied this area, later known as Namibia, under a United Nations mandate after the war. 1931 South Africa gained full autonomy as a member of the Commonwealth of Nations.

  1. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    By 1968, only Portuguese colonies and South Africa were still ruled by whites. Verwoerd - the leader of South Africa - did not like the criticism of apartheid and decided to try to make South Africa a republic, with its own president.

  2. South Africa - Apartheid Sources Questions

    Party during the 1948 elections in which they were trying to win whereas Source B is written by a British woman, living and writing in South Africa during the elections. She is writing for a newspaper called 'The Manchester Guardian' which is a serious newspaper covering world issues.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work