• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The House Of Lords

Free essay example:

The House of Lords by Pippa Woodford

The House of Lords has five main functions:

Legislative role

Scrutinising Role

Deliberative Role

Legitimating Role

Judicial Role

In a Legislative role, the HoL amends (adjusts) and revises Bills sent from HoC.

More leisurely pace and less partisan (bias) allows for more detailed examinations of bills.

Objective amendments likely to be overturned by HoC.

The legislative role changed during the Parliament Act of 1911 meaning the Lords power of veto over public legislation was removed; they were given the power to delay Bills for a maximum of 2 years (this changed to 1 year in the Parliament Act of 1949); the power to amend or veto money bills was removed and the Lords were also given powers to veto any extended life of a Parliament beyond 5 years.

‘The Salisbury Doctrine’ was a convention by the Conservative leader of the Lord, Lord Salisbury, 1945.

“Since Labour government had a mandate (permission) to introduce policies such as nationalism and welfare state, Lords should not oppose them at Second Reading”.

In a Scrutinising role, the House of Lords has no structure of departmental select committees. The HoL can set up committees to investigate particular policy areas or subjects.

Select Committees on European Communities

The European Committees have 6 subs – committees.

A Select Committee investigates Euro policies which raise important questions of policy or principles.

It could consider ‘merits’ of proposals as well as detail and also employ specialist advisors if need be. It is known to be widely admired, for example, Norton.

In both the House of Lords and Commons, members scrutinised assigned legislation as ‘statutory (lawful) instruments’.

In addition, in 1992, Delegated Powers Scrutiny Committee was to consider proposed powers to be assigned to ministers under new Bills.

Also in the Scrutinising Role, peers are relied upon in ‘Question Time’ to answer up to four ‘starred questions’ per day – one peer per day. This takes a brief 30 minutes. Ministerial Questions are generally more prolonged.

In the Deliberative Role the quality of the House of Lords debates is open to interpretation. Whips are present, but not set as rigidly as in the House of Commons.

The Legitimating Role is the “approval giving” body because it is elected.

The HoL contributes to legitimating by giving formal approval to the proposed Bills.

The Judicial functions of the House of Lords are exercised not by the whole House, but by a group of “Law Lords”. The bulk of the House’s judicial business is carried out by the twelve Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, who are specifically appointed for this purpose.

* Judicial means a ruling by or proceeding from a court of justice; "a judicial decision".

Differences from the House of Commons

The House of Lords is unelected. The Commons is elected and therefore can be said to have a representative.

The Lords are not MP’s – they are split between Life, Hereditary and People’s Lords. It can also be noted the Commons has legitimacy, as an elected body.In the UK all legislation has to be approved by the Commons who have the final say on all Bills. This is effectively giving the consent of the people to those laws that they are expected to obey. Without this consent, laws would lack authority. It is purely because of this that the Lords are not given more powers.

The HoL has a Second Chamber and a secondary role.

House of Lord members have no regular salary, if any.

The judicial role of the House of Lords includes Law Lords.

Clerics, bishops and archbishops are all involved in the House of Lords.

The HoL does not hold the government to account; the scrutiny functions of the Commons are more wide-ranging than those of the Lords.

General issues are discussed in more extensive time by the Lords, which is a more conscious chamber than the Commons.

The Government and its legislation can be scrutinized well by the Lords especially because it contains many experts such as Scientists.

A particularly important role of the Lords is a select committee which takes care of EU legislation.

The Commons do not have the right to delay legislation; however the House of Lords have the power to delay for up to a year (Parliamentary Act, 1949).

In conclusion, I believe the more crucial House, in terms of the superiority of its functions and greater authority and power, is the House of Commons - specifically because it is elected and should be a representative for the public, etc.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    The Royal Commission report became known as the Wakeham Report and contained 132 wide-ranging proposals. According to the report, the Commission had recommended that there should be no major extensions of the powers of the second chamber. The powers of the second chamber would remain as present with expansion of its scrutiny.

  2. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    The House of Commons need to grant approval of the government, if they do, then the House of Commons are granting the government the authority of the nation, indirectly. This strengthens and sustains the government, since it has approval of the people.

  1. "The present make up and powers of the House of Lords are unsatisfactory and ...

    The Life Peerage Act of 1958 single handedly revitalized the House of Lords by the introduction of new blood. The new members were men and women who reached prominence in public life and their peerage provided an increased resource of specialization and experience to the House which otherwise was dying out.

  2. What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second ...

    This could result in the Conservative element of the house making it extremely difficult and significantly delaying any bills bought forward by a Labour government. This potentially hinders the political process and the impartiality required of a house that finalises and debates matters of public interest in a democratic state in the 21st century.

  1. The House of Commons

    exposure of MPs private life, the threat of de-selection which means that an MP will be unable to stand in the next election and physical threats this type of threat is rarely used. These happen when MP's act against the wishes of their party The whip can also make promises

  2. A House Divided.

    Men and women in the Southern colonies did not work together at all. On the contrary, social life in the Northern colonies proved to be much different. Unlike Virginia and Maryland colonists, New Englanders moved across the Atlantic in whole families. This led to a more evenly balanced sex ratio.

  1. Discuss The Various Roles of an MP in the House of Commons.

    Standing committee members study the bill clause by clause, making any needed changes. Members of the standing committee come from different parties chosen by the whips. Standing committees are AD-HOC and most of the committees consist of about 40 members.

  2. Lord Salisbury and Palmerston.

    This outlook and strategy were based on a response to the expansionist and envious activities of Russia and France. Salisbury's foreign policy was simple and clear cut: when dealing with strong powers at first use diplomacy, but at the same time recognise that such a policy is only effective if supplemented by military force and the will to use it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work