• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The House Of Lords

Free essay example:

The House of Lords by Pippa Woodford

The House of Lords has five main functions:

Legislative role

Scrutinising Role

Deliberative Role

Legitimating Role

Judicial Role

In a Legislative role, the HoL amends (adjusts) and revises Bills sent from HoC.

More leisurely pace and less partisan (bias) allows for more detailed examinations of bills.

Objective amendments likely to be overturned by HoC.

The legislative role changed during the Parliament Act of 1911 meaning the Lords power of veto over public legislation was removed; they were given the power to delay Bills for a maximum of 2 years (this changed to 1 year in the Parliament Act of 1949); the power to amend or veto money bills was removed and the Lords were also given powers to veto any extended life of a Parliament beyond 5 years.

‘The Salisbury Doctrine’ was a convention by the Conservative leader of the Lord, Lord Salisbury, 1945.

“Since Labour government had a mandate (permission) to introduce policies such as nationalism and welfare state, Lords should not oppose them at Second Reading”.

In a Scrutinising role, the House of Lords has no structure of departmental select committees. The HoL can set up committees to investigate particular policy areas or subjects.

Select Committees on European Communities

The European Committees have 6 subs – committees.

A Select Committee investigates Euro policies which raise important questions of policy or principles.

It could consider ‘merits’ of proposals as well as detail and also employ specialist advisors if need be. It is known to be widely admired, for example, Norton.

In both the House of Lords and Commons, members scrutinised assigned legislation as ‘statutory (lawful) instruments’.

In addition, in 1992, Delegated Powers Scrutiny Committee was to consider proposed powers to be assigned to ministers under new Bills.

Also in the Scrutinising Role, peers are relied upon in ‘Question Time’ to answer up to four ‘starred questions’ per day – one peer per day. This takes a brief 30 minutes. Ministerial Questions are generally more prolonged.

In the Deliberative Role the quality of the House of Lords debates is open to interpretation. Whips are present, but not set as rigidly as in the House of Commons.

The Legitimating Role is the “approval giving” body because it is elected.

The HoL contributes to legitimating by giving formal approval to the proposed Bills.

The Judicial functions of the House of Lords are exercised not by the whole House, but by a group of “Law Lords”. The bulk of the House’s judicial business is carried out by the twelve Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, who are specifically appointed for this purpose.

* Judicial means a ruling by or proceeding from a court of justice; "a judicial decision".

Differences from the House of Commons

The House of Lords is unelected. The Commons is elected and therefore can be said to have a representative.

The Lords are not MP’s – they are split between Life, Hereditary and People’s Lords. It can also be noted the Commons has legitimacy, as an elected body.In the UK all legislation has to be approved by the Commons who have the final say on all Bills. This is effectively giving the consent of the people to those laws that they are expected to obey. Without this consent, laws would lack authority. It is purely because of this that the Lords are not given more powers.

The HoL has a Second Chamber and a secondary role.

House of Lord members have no regular salary, if any.

The judicial role of the House of Lords includes Law Lords.

Clerics, bishops and archbishops are all involved in the House of Lords.

The HoL does not hold the government to account; the scrutiny functions of the Commons are more wide-ranging than those of the Lords.

General issues are discussed in more extensive time by the Lords, which is a more conscious chamber than the Commons.

The Government and its legislation can be scrutinized well by the Lords especially because it contains many experts such as Scientists.

A particularly important role of the Lords is a select committee which takes care of EU legislation.

The Commons do not have the right to delay legislation; however the House of Lords have the power to delay for up to a year (Parliamentary Act, 1949).

In conclusion, I believe the more crucial House, in terms of the superiority of its functions and greater authority and power, is the House of Commons - specifically because it is elected and should be a representative for the public, etc.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The House of Commons

    Another major factor which undermines the effectiveness of select committee is the extent of what is called; the official secrets' within the British political system, this is guaranteed by the official secrets act which was passed in 1911 and update in 1987 to ensure that all information about the government

  2. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    This is because the Labour government redressed the party political imbalance between life peers by appointing Labour 'working peers' to the House. Thus, the life peers have no more constitutional legitimacy than do hereditary peers. Therefore, the removal of the hereditary peers does not effect any constitutional change or obtain any greater democratic legitimacy.

  1. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    of foxhunting but seeing as they are all Lords they probably did this for their own benefit! The other of these two similarities is that they both debate although they debate in different ways and circumstances.

  2. What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second ...

    The majority of hereditary peers are widely believed to be of Conservative loyalty politically due to the previous supremacy of the party in British history resulting in such ideals being shared by the people in power in the past when assigning peers.

  1. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    the law created much complaint amongst the landowners and had virtually no result. Other minor measure e.g., the right for serfs to purchase land (if they could) were forgotten under the impact of the 1848 revolution. The stability of Russia compared with her neighbours provided a strong argument for retaining serfdom.

  2. Discuss The Various Roles of an MP in the House of Commons.

    However there are problems with the standing committee because they have no specialist knowledge or expertise, so it is pointless for certain MPs to be in there. MPs have so many bills to look at that they do not do the job effectively.

  1. Lord Salisbury and Palmerston.

    With the African colonies he was quite happy to retain a presence on their coastal areas but took little interest with the interior of these places. He did not wish to over-extend Britain's global commitments. If a territory was to be added to the Empire then there should be a sound reason for doing so.

  2. "The present make up and powers of the House of Lords are unsatisfactory and ...

    This was a particular problem in 1945 when the new Labour Government wanted to carry out a significant program of nationalisation against the wishes of the Lords. The Commons therefore had to invoke the 1911 Act to introduce the 1949 Parliament Act, which reduced the delaying power of the Lords to one year.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work