• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The world, and more particularly Hollywood, is obsessed with the plight of Tibet. In reality Tibet's story is similar to many stories of oppression around the globe, but for some reason Westerners seem to focus more on Tibet.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The world, and more particularly Hollywood, is obsessed with the plight of Tibet. In reality Tibet's story is similar to many stories of oppression around the globe, but for some reason Westerners seem to focus more on Tibet. Answering the question of why that is, is almost as difficult as determining the actual issue itself. Is China's claim to Tibet as part of its multi-ethnic nation proper, or is Tibet's claim to a national identity valid. Both China and Tibet have valid arguments for whether Tibet should or should not be an independent country; there is no clear claim to legitimacy in either case. Time will prove which view is correct. If Chinese efforts to modernize and educate produce the desired result of winning the hearts and minds of ethnic Tibetans then China is correct. However, if these efforts fail then they prove the strength of Tibetan culture and their national unity and prove the legitimacy of their claim to independence for political Tibet (ethnographic autonomy being unrealistic). United States intervention in Tibet would not be valid if the intent were to affect the issue of sovereignty, but in regards to human rights the US and UN has an obligation to uphold them. It is interesting to delve into possible reasons for our obsession with Tibet, as well as to examine the numerous fallacies that go along with Western perception. In "Seven Years in Tibet", Hollywood portrays a people who are simple, peace loving and happy. ...read more.

Middle

Tibet was extraordinarily primitive militarily. The British managed to defeat them with an expeditionary force earlier in the century. "In the battle of Guru alone, between six hundred and seven hundred Tibetan troops were killed in a matter of minutes. No match for the invaders, the British force entered Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, on August 3, 1904." (Goldstein, 23) In defending their claim to being independent the Tibetans cite history the same as the Chinese. They don't consider their subjugation under the Yuan to be an example of being part of the Chinese state. "Tibetans accept only that they, like China, were subjugated by the Mongols and incorporated into a Mongol empire centered in China." (Goldstein, 4) Under the Ming they had a completely independent administration of Tibet for virtually the entire period, so they don't consider themselves to have been a part of China during that period either. Even during the Qing period Tibet was almost totally autonomous of the rest of China. They had their own independent administration of government, and eventually their own military force. When the Qing government fell in 1911 the Tibetans quickly saw the opportunity to be truly independent. "The fall of the Qing dynasty was a stroke of good fortune that the thirteenth Dalai Lama immediately capitalized on. ...he organized a military force to regain his power.. (he) triumphantly returned to Lhasa in 1913." (Goldstein, 30) From 1913 until 1950 the Dalai Lama and the government of Tibet independently governed Tibet effectively. ...read more.

Conclusion

(Santora, NYT) Steps such as these are appropriate in helping to ease the suffering of the Tibetans. The Chinese should not be allowed to continue persecuting the religious practices of the Tibetans, and not following proper procedures of law (such as with Lobsang Dondrub). The US has set a precedent of military intervention to aid repressed ethnic groups, such as the Albanians and recently the Iraqis and Kurds. Intervention in Tibet however is not nearly as clear cut. First of all from a pragmatic view a war with China would be extraordinarily costly and bloody, and possibly trigger another World War. Ethically Tibetans in a few years might no longer want independence. The efforts of the Chinese to modernize and educate Tibetans may very well result in a new acceptance of Chinese rule, and in that case cutting of Tibet from China would be detrimental. The one question that is difficult to comprehend is: Why does China want to hold Tibet if the people there truly do not want to belong to a greater China? If the people resist of what benefit can China get out of the occupation? No one in history has been able to subjugate a resisting people forever, and China will certainly not be able to achieve it with the Tibetans. If the Tibetans truly want to be free then China ought to let them go for their own benefit. Occupying a hostile country is expensive, draining and a poor investment. Perhaps the Chinese will on day realize the futility of their efforts and let Tibet go. Knupp 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    They were given free rail travel so they could get to Beijing to take part in major rallies. As a result of this the Red Guards ran wild and by 1967 law and order had been broken down in many parts of China.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Finally the franchise was widened although it was still based on money qualifications, were the citizen had to possess Lm6 per annum in rent or property. Italian Refugees in Malta In 1821 after that the revolts in Italy had started, in Malta we experienced the first lot of refugees who came to shelter themselves.

  1. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    Anxious to gain territories and capture 'Constantinople', Russia allied with the Slavic peoples and declared war against the Ottomans. The war went terribly for the ottomans, and in 1878 they had to sue for peace. Under the treaty they had to free all the Balkan provinces, including Bosnia, Herzegovina and Bulgaria.

  2. When disputing over international borders of relations it is very common for history to ...

    China being the uncle and Tibet being the nephew. Therefore, China claims that the grammar of this peace pledge shows the recognized Chinese suzerainty over Tibet. However, this pledge actually defines the relationship between two "completely sovereign nations" (Tibet and Imperial China, Josef Kolmas, 1967, p.11). Tibet and China under Mongol control during the 13th and 14th centuries During

  1. Economic Changes after the 1949 Communist Revolution in China

    Other regulations provided for equal pay and maternity benefits, and for childcare at the workplace, to enable women to work outside the home. The overall aim of these changes was to break the power of the traditional male-dominated family, which had kept women in helplessness.

  2. The Kurds make up about blank% of Turkeys population

    (Pope 248-249) The Treaty of Sevres was written after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I. The treaty would section off an area for the Kurdish people called Kurdistan, along with other nations. Most of the area would be within today's modern Turkey but also parts in Syria, Iraq, Armenia, and Iran.

  1. From 1949 to the beginning of the Great Leap Forward in 1958, China went ...

    Firstly, the workers were low paid, working for long hours and under harsh discipline, which was against the Communism idea "From each according to his ability: To each according to his needs." In other words, this has gone back to the proletariat system.

  2. Public administration in China

    in the world, China has remained remarkably true to its own cultural and historical origins. That is why external reforms have been difficult to introduce in the public sector and why the bureaucracy remains paternalist and often discretionary in its relations with the public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work