• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has New Labour abandoned traditional Labour values?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent has New Labour abandoned traditional Labour values? After decades of consistent defeat, the Labour party sought the need for change in the early 1980s. Although Labour started to change under the leadership of Neil Kinnock in 1983, it wasn't until 1990 that Peter Mandelson, then the party's director of communications, was able to claim that "we have now effectively completed the building of the new model party". And it wasn't until 1994 when Tony Blair was chosen to lead the Labour party that the "New Labour" project was introduced. The introduction of New Labour was aimed at getting rid of the "party of the past" image that Labour had earned to itself and also to evolve into an electable party. For this to happen, radical policy changes needed to be made. In Blair's view, "Labour needed a quantum leap to become a serious party of government again". There were however, significant constraints on the way to achieving drastic changes. ...read more.

Middle

One of the first actions that Tony Blair took as the Leader of New Labour was to bring forth a discussion of Clause IV of the Party constitution which had a history going back to 1918, addressing the main principles and beliefs of the Labour Party. After holding a special conference in Central Hall, Westminster, the same venue where Labour's 1918 Constitution was adopted, the Clause was dimineshed and a replacement was put forward. In the first Party conference after the 1997 general elections- in which Labour won with a majority greater than any other party had enjoyed since the 1940s- Tony Blair said: "Last May they (the electorate) voted for New Labour ... They wanted a new Labour Party. Not in the pocket of the trade unions. Not taxing them through the roof. Not chasing after every passing fad of the political fringe." The most radical change that New Labour had adopted was in economical policies. After admitting that Globalisation had taken away the ability to control and direct the flow of wealth centrally, New Labour decided to abandon the Party's policy ...read more.

Conclusion

New Labour is considerably pro-European and supports adopting the single currency. This would not have been the case, if Old Labour was still around. There is clearly enough evidence to claim that New Labour has adopted entirely new beliefs on certain issues, such as the economy, Trade Unions, Europe, etc. But of course, there is no need for argument on this claim since it is widely accepted by the Labour Party and Tony Blair himself that the party has changed and moved on to a new stage. He officially condemns the era in which his party refused to respond to the need for change (and preferred to lose elections rather than give up principles). He addressed his party members in Labour's latest Party conference warning them to learn the lessons of history and remember that the party was banished to the electoral wilderness for 18 years when it refused to face up to the need for change. But the question is, if a Labour Party doesn't stand for Labour values, how can it call itself the Labour Party? Well, it actually calls itself 'New' Labour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

Response to Question
A question that begins "To what extent..." invites the candidate to debate the topic of the question, and a discussion of how far New Labour has gone from traditional Labour values could have included counter-arguments, such as ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Response to Question
A question that begins "To what extent..." invites the candidate to debate the topic of the question, and a discussion of how far New Labour has gone from traditional Labour values could have included counter-arguments, such as the fact that Old Labour only began around 1980, and that the values of Attlee fall more under modern liberal. However, their examination of the ways in which Labour has moved to the right, and away from the dominant democratic socialist strand of Benn and Foot is detailed and considers a variety of ways in which the party changed as it moved towards New Labour, making for a very good response overall.

Level of analysis

Level of Analysis
The level of analysis in this essay is excellent. The candidate clearly introduces areas of policy, and then describes how they have changed from Old Labour to New Labour, with a focus on how this may be a move away from traditional socialist positions. The candidate's inclusion of extra information, such as "Tony Blair mentioned the word ‘new’ on 59 occasions- 16 of them with reference to New Labour- in the Party Conference in 1995" demonstrates a good knowledge of Blair's premiership of the party and the period of transition from Old to New Labour.

Quality of writing

Quality of Writing
Spelling and grammar are excellent, and the candidate's style of writing is very good. They write in a mature and controlled style, expressing their ideas in a clear and succinct way. There is a clear introduction and conclusion, but personally I do not like the final line (But the question is, if a Labour Party doesn’t stand for Labour values, how can it call itself the Labour Party? Well, it actually calls itself ‘New’ Labour) and I do not feel that it works well. While acknowledging the genesis of Blair's Third Way, referring to the Conservatives as "Tory", while very common in everyday life and the media, is not strictly correct terminology, and may be a point of contention for examiners.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by ecaudate 26/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The Unknown Citizen": Auden's Satire of the State"

    Policies taken out in his name prove that he was fully insured, And his Health-card shows he was once in a hospital but left it cured. Both Producers Research and High-Grade Living declare He was fully sensible to the advantages of the Installment Plan And had everything necessary to the

  2. UN (MODEL) Opening Speech - Republic of Congo - Economic Committee - Diamond Trade

    in violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of that country, just as it is today one of the main reasons for the RUF's armed rebellion in Sierra Leone and, indeed, that of UNITA in Angola. Civil war still rages the country for control of the diamond fields.

  1. To what extent is Parliament supreme?

    As Lord Hoffman said in the case R .vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms and another.(1999) : "Parliamentary Sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

  2. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    The Communist Party was losing a lot of its early popularity. So, in 1956, Mao Zedong decided to give the Chinese people an opportunity to say what they wanted about the Communist Party, its leaders and its policies. Mao said 'Let a hundred flowers bloom, which meant that free speech and arguments were healthy and should be encouraged.

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Similarly to the ACLL, the Chartists also enjoyed huge public support. This public support was also widespread, coming from all around the country.

  2. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    top military commanders as well as declaring martial law or a state of emergency. It is the president along with the Prime Minister who choose the Cabinet and the heads of the three 'power ministries', namely the ministries of defence, interior and foreign affairs.

  1. What Are The Key Elements Of Thatcherism? To What Extent Was It A Reaction ...

    Trade Unions far more in formation of policy than before the war. Secondly, the range of policies enacted - which were based to a large extent on the work of Beveridge and Keynes, with broad agreement on such issues as full employment, welfare, role of Trade Unions and Britain's international role.

  2. What factors do Prime Ministers take into account when choosing their cabinets?

    bit of legislation to be passed, and then the cabinet cannot stand in his way. A good example of this is The Millennium Dome. Many of the cabinet opposed the idea of the Dome, yet despite this Tony Blair made sure that it was given the government funding it needed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work