• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What extent is it fair to say that 'the work of the chartist came to nothing?'

Extracts from this document...


To What extent is it fair to say that 'the work of the chartist came to nothing?' Chartism failed, but the charter didn't. I say this because by the end of a 20 year reign as the foremost supported campaign nationwide, Chartism didn't achieve a single one of its demands. Over drastic requests for the time, an unwillingness to consolidate together and a reluctance to accept middle class support, destroyed the chances of what was mostly a very reasonable charter from being accepted in its lifetime. The fact that over the next century, under much less pressure the government reformed to meet 5 out of the 6 requests of the charter shows that the violent and obtuse methods of the Chartist put the movement back up to 70 years. Indeed the methods of the chartist often repulsed their fellow members to join other causes as C. ...read more.


As pre mentioned 5 points of the charter where accepted over time, and responsibility of this must be given to among others the middle classes. As time moved on further from the bad memory of the violence and revolutionary'esq behaviour of some chartist group's, MP's became more willing to look at political reform. This climaxed in 1928 with the vote being granted to all. This proves that the people in charge of Britain are not power crazed politicians only looking after there own interests, but men who listen to the people and respond to their feelings. The simple fact is that the chartist under bad leadership and visions of grandeur, stopped Chartism from happening in there time. As Chartism peaked, economic prosperity troughed, this by no coincidence. The bad harvest in the late 1830's and early 1840's caused famines across England. ...read more.


Indeed the labour party was founded on such opinion, rather than as a direct reflection of Chartism. It is true that many chartist demands where granted and this fact has often been used by historians to prop up the case for Chartism as a success. However Chartism was no longer present when these political changes occurred, indeed during its lifetime not one amendment was made to the political system, showing an almost stubborn approach of the government to grant any desire of such people. They made sure any attempt to march on parliament or display there voice was matched in every way. At the Kennington common meeting in 1848, where a petition was planned to be taken to Westminster, the government created 90,000 special constables to oppose and persuade the masses to not enter London. In reality the petition was taken without its manned escort and once again flatly rejected. (It was later found to be full of made up names ridiculing chartist ideas) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    cause' and would 'led people to their death or glory' and his popularity grew though the weekly Northern Star. These are the foundations on which Chartism was born and subsequently The People's Charter was published by the L.W.M.A. in May 1838.

  2. How fair is it to Say that Peel betrayed his Party?

    Although his actions prevented possibly rebellions or even civil war, they were considered unforgivable by many Tories who believed that Peel had betrayed the Party. His nickname changed to 'lemon peel' and the voters of Oxford University forced him out of his parliamentary seat.

  1. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    However, for the majority change was seen as coming from within the existing system not by overthrowing it, which seemed the only possibility on the continent. Institutions such as the BPU served to reconcile the working classes to industrialisation by giving them a vested interest in society.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    ('The Civil Service since 1945', p150-151). The White Paper, 'The Civil Service : Continuity and Change', in 1994, marked something of a retreat on market testing, dropping a centrally imposed programme and allowing each department and agency to draw up annual 'efficiency plans', and to decide for themselves the best means of achieving efficiency.

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    The way they did this enticed people (especially the middle classes, who saw that gains could be made from the 1832 Reform Act7) into concentrating upon smaller grievances and therefore steadily took away support for what appeared to be hopeless goals.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    France knowing that migration was at its climax wanted Malta, as she knew its significance in the Mediterranean. On the other hand, because of the Italian Unification, Italy could have claims on Malta; in fact the upper classes were pro-Italian.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work