• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28? In 1815 the corn laws were passed which meant any import of corn had to pay duties until the cost of British corn reached 80s a quarter. New machinery was taking the jobs form many people; this was known as the industrial revolution. Radicals (influenced by the French revolution and American war of independence) influenced the working class to protest. The economic state of the country caused unrest, by the depressions. Governments took a laissez faire approach to the unrest, and all protests ended in riots, such as the spa field riots 1819 and Peterloo massacre. ...read more.


When reforms did occur it was in the period 1822-28; this was due to the reshuffle in the Tories party thus giving them the title liberal. Trade unions are an example of the reforms made; the amending act 1825 reduced protest as it allowed negotiation of wages and hours, but still prohibited the obstruction of workers. The Corn Laws were reformed in 1927 from 80s a quarter to 73s a quarter; the Corn Laws were on a sliding scale. Protest died down during 1822-28 due to these reforms. ...read more.


Protests weren't as popular as people were happier, not just from the reforms but also the improvement in the economic situation and harvests. These factors could be seen as more important than the reforms introduced. If protest occurred early on in the period (1815) the government were probably to blame. Later in the period (1828) the government were less to blame, other factors such as hunger politics (the working class taking an interest in politics against the genuine struggle for food.) Equally the government and other factors were responsible for popular protest throughout the period 1815-28. However later on it wouldn't be the government as much as the other factors. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    If we consider an India without Gandhi, would India have still conceivably achieved independence? Whilst historians akin to Nanda has taken a biographical view of Gandhi's life and stressed his importance, it can be strongly argued that the nature of biography means he gives a bias and contorted view of Gandhi, leading to a difference in interpretation to historians (i.e.

  2. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    The government also contributed indirectly to the unrest economically, in their introduction of legislation which made the already poor working classes poorer, eg. Corn Laws and Income Tax Repeal, which strengthened radical feeling by worsening the situation. They contributed indirectly to the social and political unrest by fuelling the radical position.

  1. Analyse the causes of Mexico's instability in the period 1821-1855

    Moderates were liberal, constitutional monarchist, who identified republic with mob rule. They supported juridical equality, freedom of the press and constitutions. They opposed monopoly and state intervention in the economy and merely tolerated foreign capital. They wanted a weak state, which could not restrain the free exercise of their economic

  2. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    However, in 1824, trade unions were set up to protect the interests of the workers against exploitation by the employer. Radical MPs such as Sir Francis Burdett and Joseph Hume believed that once workers rights were reinstated there would be an improvement in the relationship between employer and employee, as a result, in 1824, the combination laws were repealed.

  1. Was the Liberal revival of the 1960's and 1970's anything more than just a ...

    the general election results often did not convey the extend to which the Liberal party had re-established its popularity amongst the electorate. It follows then that it is also possible to argue that the Liberal revival was more than just a protest vote.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    Deliberate attempts have been made to re-allocate personnel away from the South East, for example, the Benefits Agency Headquarters was moved from London to Leeds, with the intention of cutting costs. This is part of a system of reforms which aims to encourage individuals to see themselves not as part

  1. A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card schemeA Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens

    that the card would also assist the authorities in determining the authenticity of any individual's status, thus helping to tackle issues such as benefit fraud, identity theft, crime and illegal immigration, the most important of these will be discussed. 5.1.

  2. To what extent was Lloyd-George responsible for his own downfall in 1922?

    be able to get money if they needed it as long as they paid into the scheme. However the war left millions needing benefits as the system was still in first years it did not have the money to provide all of the funds needed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work