• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28? In 1815 the corn laws were passed which meant any import of corn had to pay duties until the cost of British corn reached 80s a quarter. New machinery was taking the jobs form many people; this was known as the industrial revolution. Radicals (influenced by the French revolution and American war of independence) influenced the working class to protest. The economic state of the country caused unrest, by the depressions. Governments took a laissez faire approach to the unrest, and all protests ended in riots, such as the spa field riots 1819 and Peterloo massacre. ...read more.

Middle

When reforms did occur it was in the period 1822-28; this was due to the reshuffle in the Tories party thus giving them the title liberal. Trade unions are an example of the reforms made; the amending act 1825 reduced protest as it allowed negotiation of wages and hours, but still prohibited the obstruction of workers. The Corn Laws were reformed in 1927 from 80s a quarter to 73s a quarter; the Corn Laws were on a sliding scale. Protest died down during 1822-28 due to these reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Protests weren't as popular as people were happier, not just from the reforms but also the improvement in the economic situation and harvests. These factors could be seen as more important than the reforms introduced. If protest occurred early on in the period (1815) the government were probably to blame. Later in the period (1828) the government were less to blame, other factors such as hunger politics (the working class taking an interest in politics against the genuine struggle for food.) Equally the government and other factors were responsible for popular protest throughout the period 1815-28. However later on it wouldn't be the government as much as the other factors. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    politics, as Parekh believes, "alienated the Muslims and rendered the partition of the country unavoidable."30 Only when Britain seemed to be losing strength in their rule did he lash out against their imperial hosts and make a bold statement of intent, for example the flawed declaration of independence shortly after the Amritsar Massacre.

  2. Analyse the causes of Mexico's instability in the period 1821-1855

    One must note here that the colonial state just before independence had also been quite unstable and left in complete shambles, which the newly independent nation was forced to deal with. However, against such an unstable background, as well as the ideologies of the monarchical style of leadership, each different

  1. How close did Britain come to revolution between 1815 and 1821?

    As retaliation for the 'massacre' at Peterloo, the Spenceans plotted to kill leading government ministers - Castlereagh and Sidmouth. Arthur Thistlewood rented a house on Cato Street to start a riot at a dinner. One of the Spencens' meeting was infiltrated by a government spy George Edwards, and so the government was ready and prepared even before the riot started.

  2. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    In 1822, Canning replaced Castlereagh as foreign secretary; and Peel replaced Sidmouth as Home secretary. In 1823, Robinson replaced Vansittart as Chancellor of the Exchequer; and Huskisson became the president of the board of trade. But although these men were new to their senior positions within the party, they were

  1. Was the Liberal revival of the 1960's and 1970's anything more than just a ...

    the general election results often did not convey the extend to which the Liberal party had re-established its popularity amongst the electorate. It follows then that it is also possible to argue that the Liberal revival was more than just a protest vote.

  2. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    The toughening of the Game Laws in 1816, making poaching an offence punishable by up to seven years' imprisonment was hugely unpopular among the working classes for whom poaching had always been considered a legitimate way of supplementing income. According to the historian E.P Thompson the new Game Laws were,

  1. How Far Was Lord Liverpool's Government Directly Responsible for the popular unrest in the ...

    Finally, the general depression of the post war years meant unemployment became more of a problem, and wages fell. This all contributed to the Civil Unrest. Lord Liverpool's Government may not have been responsible for all the factors, but in their handling of the crisis, they are without doubt at fault.

  2. To what extent was Lloyd-George responsible for his own downfall in 1922?

    be able to get money if they needed it as long as they paid into the scheme. However the war left millions needing benefits as the system was still in first years it did not have the money to provide all of the funds needed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work