• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28? In 1815 the corn laws were passed which meant any import of corn had to pay duties until the cost of British corn reached 80s a quarter. New machinery was taking the jobs form many people; this was known as the industrial revolution. Radicals (influenced by the French revolution and American war of independence) influenced the working class to protest. The economic state of the country caused unrest, by the depressions. Governments took a laissez faire approach to the unrest, and all protests ended in riots, such as the spa field riots 1819 and Peterloo massacre. ...read more.

Middle

When reforms did occur it was in the period 1822-28; this was due to the reshuffle in the Tories party thus giving them the title liberal. Trade unions are an example of the reforms made; the amending act 1825 reduced protest as it allowed negotiation of wages and hours, but still prohibited the obstruction of workers. The Corn Laws were reformed in 1927 from 80s a quarter to 73s a quarter; the Corn Laws were on a sliding scale. Protest died down during 1822-28 due to these reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Protests weren't as popular as people were happier, not just from the reforms but also the improvement in the economic situation and harvests. These factors could be seen as more important than the reforms introduced. If protest occurred early on in the period (1815) the government were probably to blame. Later in the period (1828) the government were less to blame, other factors such as hunger politics (the working class taking an interest in politics against the genuine struggle for food.) Equally the government and other factors were responsible for popular protest throughout the period 1815-28. However later on it wouldn't be the government as much as the other factors. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    It is therefore more likely that O'Connor saved the movement and turned "a pressure group into a national movement"11. However there were some ways in which the leadership contributed in the ultimate failure of the movement. The perception of O'Connor as a "physical force" Chartist and Lovett as a "moral force" Chartist cannot have aided the movement.

  2. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    politics meant that he lost sight of the objective of Indian leaders. By consistently pushing for complete independence at every possible opportunity, rather than looking for gradual concessions from the British government that would lead to independence, it could be said that Gandhi undermined his effectiveness as a political figure.

  1. A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card schemeA Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens

    CONCLUSION AND RECCOMMENDATIONS To conclude then, generally it has been felt that the majority of people have no problem with the actual principle of carrying an ID card of some description. The main objection however, appear to be the vast amount of shielded personal data that is held on the

  2. How Far Was Lord Liverpool's Government Directly Responsible for the popular unrest in the ...

    The Government had greatly increased their personal wealth at the expense of the poor. Many reactionaries of the day saw this as clear class legislation, inspiring many rallies and protests. The abolition of Income Tax and the increase of Indirect Taxes to compensate directly benefited the rich whilst severely affecting the poor.

  1. Analyse the causes of Mexico's instability in the period 1821-1855

    tried in civilian courts but only in either ecclesiastical or military courts respectively. Although the independence wars were over, the army had still not been demobilised. Both the army and the church had one thing in common, there were both privileged under the fueros and enjoyed legal immunities and exemptions from civil courts.

  2. Was the Liberal revival of the 1960's and 1970's anything more than just a ...

    World War; poll a double figure percentage vote at 11.2% in the 1964 general election. Although the party's percentage vote dropped under 10% again in the following 1966 and 1970 general elections, the percentage vote stayed in double figures for the duration of the 1970's, polling an impressive average of

  1. What was the state of Britain in 1815?

    In the cities there was also a huge population increase which caused many problems, such as lack of food. The working conditions of the poor workers were also horrendous and women and children were exploited very badly. All these things created a lot of resentment towards the rich.

  2. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    political organisations and demand a more open debate on the existing political and social system, which deprived them of their rights. Major Cartwright's, (a prominent figure in the radical movement), introduction of well over a hundred debating societies known as Hampden Clubs increased political awareness and they presented their grievances

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work