• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were governments responsible for popular protest in the period 1815-28? In 1815 the corn laws were passed which meant any import of corn had to pay duties until the cost of British corn reached 80s a quarter. New machinery was taking the jobs form many people; this was known as the industrial revolution. Radicals (influenced by the French revolution and American war of independence) influenced the working class to protest. The economic state of the country caused unrest, by the depressions. Governments took a laissez faire approach to the unrest, and all protests ended in riots, such as the spa field riots 1819 and Peterloo massacre. ...read more.

Middle

When reforms did occur it was in the period 1822-28; this was due to the reshuffle in the Tories party thus giving them the title liberal. Trade unions are an example of the reforms made; the amending act 1825 reduced protest as it allowed negotiation of wages and hours, but still prohibited the obstruction of workers. The Corn Laws were reformed in 1927 from 80s a quarter to 73s a quarter; the Corn Laws were on a sliding scale. Protest died down during 1822-28 due to these reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Protests weren't as popular as people were happier, not just from the reforms but also the improvement in the economic situation and harvests. These factors could be seen as more important than the reforms introduced. If protest occurred early on in the period (1815) the government were probably to blame. Later in the period (1828) the government were less to blame, other factors such as hunger politics (the working class taking an interest in politics against the genuine struggle for food.) Equally the government and other factors were responsible for popular protest throughout the period 1815-28. However later on it wouldn't be the government as much as the other factors. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    him of others."27 Parekh adds that Gandhi overlooked the specific context the suffering he perceived was in; for example of how Nazi brutality had little effect on a German population - in other words Gandhi's views rested on an optimistic view of humanity.

  2. Was the Liberal revival of the 1960's and 1970's anything more than just a ...

    the general election results often did not convey the extend to which the Liberal party had re-established its popularity amongst the electorate. It follows then that it is also possible to argue that the Liberal revival was more than just a protest vote.

  1. Analyse the causes of Mexico's instability in the period 1821-1855

    One must note here that the colonial state just before independence had also been quite unstable and left in complete shambles, which the newly independent nation was forced to deal with. However, against such an unstable background, as well as the ideologies of the monarchical style of leadership, each different

  2. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    'as much as sign of the continued ascendancy of the landowners as was the protection of the Corn Law itself'. This obvious use of class legislation to protect the interests of the rich while oppressing the poor contributed hugely to the growing unrest, strengthening radical politics and support.

  1. To what extent was Lloyd-George responsible for his own downfall in 1922?

    As well as wasting money on 'Homes fit for heroes' LG also failed to modernise British industry. Britain was already at a loss because of the seizure of exportation during the war and with more advanced countries such as Switzerland producing cheaper raw goods like coal; it comes as no surprise that Britain lost out even more.

  2. A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card schemeA Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens

    conceal his operations, He claimed asylum with one, and used his real name when caught shoplifting by the Police" [3] However it should be mentioned that the terror threat is a very current one, and those opposing the scheme, taking into account its expected date for implementation argue that "A

  1. How Far Was Lord Liverpool's Government Directly Responsible for the popular unrest in the ...

    The Corn Laws were a measure to protect Britain's Farmers (Land owning gentry) from foreign competition, raising the price of grain. This scheme achieved its intended purpose, and until 1817 the gentry enjoyed large prices. The cost of this was that the poorer people in the country could barely afford enough food to survive.

  2. What was the state of Britain in 1815?

    In the cities there was also a huge population increase which caused many problems, such as lack of food. The working conditions of the poor workers were also horrendous and women and children were exploited very badly. All these things created a lot of resentment towards the rich.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work