• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT WERE LLOYD GEORGE'S OWN POLICIES, RATHER THAN HIS DEPENDENCE ON THE CONSERVATIVES, RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS POLITICAL DECLINE FROM 1918 - 22? How did Lloyd George become an outdated asset in 1922 from a wartime hero in 1918 in the space of four years? Lloyd George's own policies and his dependence on the conservatives did play a part in his political decline; however this alone didn't account for his failure and fall. A range of events, issues and reactions played a pivotal part in his downfall. Before 1918 LG had long been the most dynamic Liberal minister, he injected energy into the Liberal party to show that the party wasn't doomed to decline. During the war he was made Minister of Munitions, where he was the one undoubted success of the coalition. He was dynamic and thus in due course very effective. His success as Minister of Munitions led to him becoming Prime Minister in December 1916, where he replaced Herbert Asquith. Most Liberal ministers resigned with Asquith, and about half the Liberal MPs (120) supported the old Prime Minister rather than the new. While the war continued it was said that he was 'acting more like a president than a prime minister, his leadership style, was accumulating enemies, and thus storing up trouble in the future. ...read more.


Only �64 million was pruned from the 'Geddes Axe'. Housing was an issue that had to be addressed, the housing programme by Addison was a qualified success however, and it did not live up to people's hopes or expectations. Addison had spent too much. He was unable to build 'homes fit for heroes'; instead it was now referred to 'homes only heroes would agree to live in'. Addison failed to look into the future and predict a rapid fall in prices during the slump. However he had done much to ensure that in future housing needs were looked upon as a government responsibility instead of being left to market forces. Once again the finger of blame was pointed at Lloyd George he had appointed a man who was unable to deliver a land fit for heroes the promise had been broken. Lloyd George lost many working class supporters due to his ill handling of the industrial situation after the war. The rise of unemployment after the war made him an electoral liability. Success or failure of an industry depended on the economy, and after the war the British economy suffered. There was a new militancy from the trade unions after the war, there was a sense of 'red revolution' growing in Britain leading on from the success of the Bolshevik revolution. ...read more.


The Irish question was eventually answered to but not 'solved'. On 6th December 1921 the Anglo - Irish treaty was signed, the PM in my opinion succeeded in coming to a resolution whilst the cloud of intricacies of the problem hanging over him. Some Conservatives were disgusted with the idea of partition, questions arose from this settlement, was this a sign that the British Empire disintegrating? However majority of the Conservatives voted for the treaty. The aftermath of the treaty caused outrage in Ireland, Michael Collins and many others were killed, a virtual civil war began in the new self-governing state. The finger was pointed at Lloyd George. To answer the question, to what extent were Lloyd George's own policies, rather than his dependence on the Conservatives, responsible for his political decline, it is fair to say that his fall from office was of his own making, as the years passed on he was indecisive, ineffective, and as a result confidence factor grew into the Conservatives that they could succeed without him and they could make decisions or choices must better than him. On the 19th October, Stanley Baldwin's speech did play a part as it expressed simply and clearly what many Tory MPs were thinking. At the Carlton Club meeting in 1922 the Conservatives voted to end the coalition and this ditch Lloyd George as Prime Minister. ?? ?? ?? ?? FAHIM TALUKDER U6SD ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    These short-term measures employed by the government helped to appease many people, forcing back progress made by the Chartists. This effect can be linked with a weakness of leadership, as it was perhaps an indication that Chartist demands were 'ahead of their time'.

  2. To what extent are senior British civil servants still “anonymous, permanent and politically neutral?” ...

    This was probably the first time that ministers actually named specific civil servants as being the ones on whom blame fell. Civil servants were instructed by Downing Street to leak certain information which was damaging to Michael Heseltine.

  1. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    world position, but they both became aware of the necessity to become part of that union once the British Empire had started to collapse in the 1960s. The two political parties disagreed on many policies, sometimes it was just a matter of emphasis, but on others the differences were more significant.

  2. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    he believed raised "moral issues of trust and self-respect and should be met with a moral response' had the desired effect; major cities such as Bombay and Calcutta being halted to standstill. Another meeting, held in Amritsar on April 12, 1919, however, saw an ensuing massacre on a scale not previously witnessed outside of war.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    This denotes a good system of administration. More people had to lend money and each institution had to do its work properly thus leading to money wastage from the part of the government. An interesting thing was the survey on the population of the Maltese Islands.

  2. Personalities not policies

    However in 1957, resigns due to ill health, due to the pressures of Suez. Macmillan then comes into power, from 1957, having narrowly defeated Butler in the power struggle. Macmillan proved to be a smooth political operator and established a reputation for skillful political management.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    When he presented this proposal to his cabinet in the November it became very clear to Peel the serious division within the cabinet. Only three support the repeal where the rest were either unconvinced that the Irish problem was bad or just didn't want to face the moral or political implications.

  2. The causes and the political and social consequences of the Dreyfus Affair in France

    The historians played a creditable role in the Affair. They entered on the public scene as savants, commenting the indictment of Dreyfus that was unscientific grounds. The historians finally took part in the Affair because the opened practise of their knowledge and the feeling of belonging to an intellectual community endowed them with a consciousness of citizenship.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work