• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Tony Blair has been criticised by some for being a Tory Prime Minister leading a Labour government." Assess how much Blair's approach to power owes to the legacy of Margaret Thatcher, both in terms of style and policy.

Extracts from this document...


6) "Tony Blair has been criticised by some for being a Tory Prime Minister leading a Labour government." Assess how much Blair's approach to power owes to the legacy of Margaret Thatcher, both in terms of style and policy. Since Labour came into power in 1997 Tony Blair has been criticised by some for being the 'son of Thatcher'. Many say that labour is now following the values and policies similar to that of a Tory government and in particular a Tory government lead by Margaret Thatcher. Before the time of Tony Blair and New Labour, the left wing party stood firm on one value and that was socialism. More on Labours old Values and policies The conservatives on the other hand have very different policies or not so different as some may argue. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher lead the conservative government from 1979-1990 and she made some very radical changes that have stuck. After the Thatcher years there was no turning back, some say that we are all Thatcherites now. "Across the world governments are almost regardless of party introducing economic reforms resembling the Thatcherite programme. This suggests that Thatcherism in Britain was a necessary adjustment to changing patterns in the world economy." Thatcher attempted to introduce historically different policies and to replace the cooperative policy style of British government. The most important changes Thatcher made were economic and these policies were three fold. ...read more.


This is very similar to Thatcher's privatisation changes but there is one main difference. Instead of the government producing a large sum of money for a new school, for example, they agree to pay a private firm an annual fee, this is to cover the cost of the entire construction, maintenance and management. One of the arguments against PFI is that this 'letting' of services could lead to actual services being taken over by private firms. For example the fear is that services such as teaching and healthcare will be in private hands. Not only is there the threat that standards will fall but this means a vast number of public-sector workers face losing employment rights. Chancellor, Gordon Brown supports PFI and thinks it is the quickest way of building new hospitals, schools etc. he also believes that PFI will help stretch the governments money in but in 2002 said "The issue is not public good, private bad -or private good public bad." From this statement we can gather that even the government agree that there are problems and a risk involved with PFI, but they obviously think that the private out-weighs public. The main question is why is labour adopting these economic changes when privatisation is a Tory idea? Blair has mimicked Thatcher which prompted many to raise the point of whether Tony Blair is a Tory Prime Minister leading a labour government. ...read more.


However some believe that the number of backbenchers revolting against Tony Blair would have been even higher if the Government had not repeatedly told MP's that this would not be their last chance of expressing opinion before going to war. The public were just as against war as Tony Blair's backbenchers. "The decision to go to war over Iraq had significant implications for Britain in terms of foreign policy. Despite the apparent internationalism of the New Labour project, Blair was prepared to act without UN approval and against the wishes of a large section of the international community" governing as new labour- policy and politics under Blair (Jim Butler) page 207 There were of course a huge amount of anti-war protests and it is thought that some members of the public no longer trust Tony Blair and the labour government Butler is correct when he says; Tony Blair's decision had 'significant implications'. This is reminisant to when Margaret Thatcher took Britain to war in the Falklands (1982) because she consulted no-one in her decision. Although there is one major difference, the Falklands Island War, or more importantly the victory of this war boosted Thatcher's popularity rather than suffering a loss of popularity like Tony Blair. Another similarity between Blair in Thatcher is there 'special relationships' with the USA and in particular the USA presidents. Tony Blair had his first meeting with Bill Clinton in May 1997 One thing that can not be ignored is the recent queen's speech. This contained one very important and much debated issue that is university tuition fees. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How Powerful is British prime minister?

    The term pluralism implies that power is divided rather than concentrated; that authority lies in various institutions and is not monopolised by just one. It is the PM who is drawn from the Commons and to the Commons that the PM is accountable.

  2. "The election of Mrs Thatcher as Prime Minister in 1979, came about more because ...

    The economy was in a mess, with the biggest balance of payment deficit since the war. Industry had suffered from years of neglect and underinvestment and productivity was low. The rising price of oil, caused by problems in the Middle East had pushed up inflation.

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    The idea that Confucianism supports authoritarianism more than Democracy has been made but the opposite argument can also be made. The latter argument, however, requires a reinterpretation of the Four Classics as well as later Confucian writing. The critics of Singapore's government highlight the human rights abuses, the limits on

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    had collected many volumes of evidence to show that the open-field system was wasteful and inefficient. If the open-field system was to go, the commune could go too; and if the commune were to be abolished, the redemption dues might as well be cancelled.

  1. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    for the Conservatives in 1924, fuelling their views that some Liberals were becoming incorporated with the right. Indeed, as Laybourn points out, the working class became evermore "attached to the political ambitions of the Labour party"5 who rapidly became the main party of the left.

  2. How far was the Tory government's reaction to the problem of the radicals justified

    The 'Game Law' was designed to stamp out the sudden increase in poaching which took place after the introduction of the 'corn laws'. Yet the 'Game laws' as stern as they seem were not effective as the Government had hoped.

  1. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    When this occurred serious problems ensued for the 1970s administrations under both Wilson and Callaghan, during this period the party had shifted more to the left, this meant that Harold Wilson the PM and James Callaghan, Wilson's future successor were opposed with the party philosophy.

  2. How Profound Were The Changes Introduced by the Labour Governments?

    However no real debate on the aims and organisation of education really took place. So the changes made in education between 1945-51 suggest that the changes of the labour government were not that profound.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work