• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning?? The provisional government of Russia was established in February 1917 as a temporary replacement for Tsar Nicholas II after his abdication. Liberals of groups such as the Kadets and the Octoberisit's dominated the Provisional government. The provisional government represented mainly some nobility and middle classes. The percentage of nobility and middle classes was very small in comparison to the 80% of the population that were peasants. This shows that the provisional government did not represent the majority of people's interests in Russia. In my opinion the Provisional Government was not doomed to failure from the beginning. This is because there were many factors out of their control in 1917 that led to its downfall. In the absence of these problems the provisional government could have well survived until the elections to the constituent assembly in November 1917. These factors include the social and economic disrupt in Russia at the time, Lenin and the Bolsheviks and the dual power shared between the provisional government and the Petrograd soviet. These problems put extreme pressure on the provisional Government. Russia's wealth and land was extraordinarily unevenly distributed. 80% of the population were peasants. However 25% of land was owned by 1% of the population. This obviously meant a vast majority of the population were unhappy with their living standards and therefore with how the country was being governed. Land distribution was a major problem as there was a vast amount of land in Russia as it is a huge geographical area. ...read more.

Middle

The Bolsheviks were a political party with an extremely dedicated leader in Lenin. Lenin's main aim in life was revolution. He was extremely committed to it. Lenin's dedication to revolution was shown by his April thesis. As soon as Lenin returned from exile one of his first steps was to release a manifesto, which we call the April thesis. In this manifesto Lenin declared that he would end all cooperation with the provisional government. This bold step showed his dedication to revolution aswel as signalling a problem for the provisional government. The manifesto also included an immediate end to the war. This would of pleased many of the soldiers, as they wanted an end to the war. There was also land to be given to the peasants, soviets to take power and in the end a worldwide socialist revolution. All of these points were designed to please the majority peasants, workers and soldiers as to give them land and to end the war is what they want. Where the provisional government failed to please the majority of the population by giving them land, Lenin knew that this was one way to help gain popularity and power, as it would please the masses and unite them against the provisional government. Lenin and the Bolsheviks were also good at propaganda and offered the people of Russia an alternative leadership that would benefit them. They used slogans such as 'Bread, peace and land'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin needed to Soviets name to keep the support of the people and the soviet needed their resources and organisation. Between them they occupied key positions in the capital Petrograd aswel as arresting the provisional government. They forced the Prime Minister Kerensky to escape into exile and took power. The provisional government took over power at an extremely difficult period in Russian history. The country was in deep social and economic unrest, they were involved in the world first ever war and loosing poorly. They were also faced with a large-scale revolutionary movement that had been brewing for a very long time. The provisional governments job was to keep the country going until the elections in November. However they were unable to do this because of extreme pressure from revolutionaries such as Lenin and the Bolsheviks. This led to its demise in October to the power of the Bolsheviks and soviet. If the Provisional Government was not faced with such pressures and problems it could well have survived the 10 months it was required to however failed during the latter stage of their reign In my opinion this was not a foregone conclusion from the beginning. The provisional government showed their power by holding out from several attempted coups. They could have also taken steps to tame the revolutionary movement by giving peasants more land and catering to their needs, as they were the vast majority of the population. However they did not and the provisional government t came to an end in October and Lenin and the Bolsheviks took power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    The Provisional Government believed in a government that supported it's citizens without the use of force, basically everything the Tsar was against. The Bolsheviks believed in a strong army, and social equality. Since the Provisional Government had no immediate plans for the peasants, the Bolsheviks decided that they needed immediate action against the Provisional Government.

  2. Weimar Germany 1918-23: Was the Weimar Republic Doomed to Failure?

    A quote from 'Die Rote Fahne' or 'The Red Flag' on the 29/11/18 summarises this view of most of the communist idealists.

  1. Was the collapse of the provisional government inevitable

    While the Kadets cheered for "war until the end," the Russian army had all but disintegrated and the Bolshevik party thus had time to prepare to overthrow the provisional government and seize power. The collapse could have been avoided if the provisional government had paid more attention to the Bolsheviks

  2. The Kurds make up about blank% of Turkeys population

    In some areas the once outlawed language is now used in public schools, similar to the Native American experience. The Kurds are now even allowed to broadcast their own television station. Almost all of this is credited to the Turkish government interest in joining the European Union.

  1. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    It is true that if a government does not have control of its army it does not hold real power. What Order Number 1 made clear was that the Provisional Government did not have such power. It had, therefore, to compromise with the Soviet.

  2. To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional ...

    However, the government did acknowledge the presence of the problem but not its significance. Because of their comprehension that they were only a temporary government, they set up a committee to advise them on future policy. The committee recommended that this issue should be resolved by the Constituent Assembly.

  1. After the March revolution and the Tsar's resignation, why did the Provisional Government last ...

    Food and equipment were confiscated for the army and as a result the prices went up, living conditions were made no better. The workers in the cities were forced to work overtime for less money, and yet conditions for the soldiers were just as bad.

  2. The Revolution of 1905 in Russia

    What they had in mind was quite similar to old idea of the village commune. 3. They were against centralization and bureaucratism. They also would have nothing to do with state socialism. 4. They believed in the efficiency of political terror and propaganda (unlike the "People's Will").

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work