• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second chamber of the House of Lords?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Paul Ambrose A259446 What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second chamber [House of Lords]? Before presenting the arguments for and against the election of all members of the House of Lords, it is important to detail the role it plays. These functions were identified in the white paper of 19681, put forward by the labour government of the time, which proposed a reform of the upper chamber. The White paper detailed a number of purposes, the first of which was 'the provision of a forum for debate on matters of public interest'. Whilst performing a valuable role this allows for matters that political parties would find potentially damaging to their popularity to be debated by independent individuals. This independent debating forum also provides a platform for which to revise the Bills bought from the House of Commons before they are turned into law, allowing for necessary points to be altered for legal purposes and to address elements of the Bill that would be inappropriate for political figures to discuss. The initiation of Public Bills and Private Members' Bills and the consideration of delegated legislation were other purposes detailed in the white paper along with the scrutiny of the executive, being the most influential members of government. ...read more.

Middle

At present the majority government Labour have in the House of Commons is limited by the Lords. The upper chamber can make it difficult for legislation against, as they see it, the public interest to pass through immediately by delaying it. The process by which bills from the commons are revised also allows for some alterations before they are made into statute, again providing a safety net to limit the power a majority government can have. A further argument against absolute election is that members of the upper house who are responsible for the scrutiny of the executive could potentially become influenced by the parties that they would belong to. An inevitable outcome of electing the whole of the second chamber would be that individuals would ally themselves to political parties in order to gain campaign funds and promote themselves as candidates, thus removing the independence so vital to the role of the Lords. Not only would candidates have to limit their political views to the narrower spectrum that the major political parties provide for, thus as a consequence limiting the range of arguments present in debates, it would become necessary to follow the lead of the party in the commons in order to maintain the relationship. ...read more.

Conclusion

These leaders of the community would probably be absent in an entirely elected chamber and unable to perform the important role that they do. Their inclusion in the house helps tremendously when debates regarding issues involving morality and political black holes such as abortion are raised. Their independence and lack of political allegiance allows some points that may not have otherwise been brought about to be raised and then discussed. Whilst the current format of the lords is undemocratic and dated it is essential to the preservation of democracy and our political stability. It is this format that makes up for the shortcomings of representative democracy and helps maintain some of the positives of direct democracy. Whilst the case for reform may be a just one in the form of more life peers and fewer hereditary ones there is no real basis for complete election on the basis of protecting the peoples interests. "Agreement in principle amongst the sophisticated tends to be less than whole hearted and to beget new disagreements when principle is translated into detail. Real enthusiasm for Lords' reform is too often to be found among the eccentric and the na�ve, who may have little idea of the mediocre performance of second chambers in so many other countries or of the limited expectations that can be reasonably be reposed in a reconstituted British second chamber." - S. A. de Smith and R. Brazier. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    'First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives.' Discuss.

    5 star(s)

    It gives rise to a consistent parliamentary opposition. In theory, the flip side of a strong single-party government is that the opposition is also given enough seats to perform a critical checking role, and present itself as a realistic alternative to the government of the day. It gives a chance for popular independent candidates to be elected.

  2. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    idea of what would finally replace it was wrong and the House of Lords with the mix of hereditary and life peers would be more independent of the Government than a purely elected Chamber. To achieve the purpose of restricting the membership of hereditary peers, the House of Lords Bill

  1. Why Did the Liberals Experience a Constitutional Crisis in the Period 1909-1911? How Successful ...

    Labour unrest was marked by major industrial disputes between 1910 and 1912 on the railways and in the mines and docks over pay, conditions, and (for the railwaymen and Dockers)

  2. Discuss the possible changes to the membership of the house of Lords

    The House of Lords try to keep the government in check by threatening to amend the passing of suggested laws, but if the government is set on something they can over ride the amendment at a 3rd reading, which suggestively only slows down the process of the bill, and wastes time which could have been spent on other issues.

  1. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    Another point of the lords that is criticised, and again an important point in the matter of reform, is that the Law lords can both make and scrutinise the law, this is in complete contrast to the United States who have a separation of powers built into their clearly written and defined constitution (US Politics Today, E.

  2. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    As a result, an opposition is formed against the members chosen. The House of Lords can only be reformed or swamped; the elected government could reform the Lords or swamp it with newly created peers sympathetic to the policies of the government.

  1. "The present make up and powers of the House of Lords are unsatisfactory and ...

    This was a particular problem in 1945 when the new Labour Government wanted to carry out a significant program of nationalisation against the wishes of the Lords. The Commons therefore had to invoke the 1911 Act to introduce the 1949 Parliament Act, which reduced the delaying power of the Lords to one year.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    The election campaign was backed by the new Prime minister, Tony Blair, who had put this issue high on his list of priorities in his winning manifesto. The Scottish Conservative Party however, was humiliated in defeat, and has now been forced to accept devolution as a 'done deal'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work