• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened in the 1997 General Election and why? What impact did it have?

Extracts from this document...


What happened in the 1997 General Election and why? What impact did it have? In 1997 there was an expected swing from Conservative to Labour government. It resulted in Labour receiving 9.2% more votes, and 147 more MPs than in 1992; and with the Conservatives winning 11% less votes, and 171 less MPs than in 1992 (the Liberal Democrats won 17% of the votes about equalling the previous election, and gained 26 seats). The outcome of the election was due to various factors which had always been apparent yet commentators never predicted the severity of Labour's win and the Conservative's loss. Blatantly, the first reason for this landslide victory was the weakness of the Conservatives. Broadly put, the reasons the electorate DID NOT vote for the Conservative party were that they seemed, old, tired, divided and sleazy. This can be seen in that the average age of a Conservative MP was over 50 and 44% of over 65s voted for them, their campaigning was limited, there was internal conflict over many issues such as the Economy and Europe. ...read more.


This means that it stops the Conservatives getting seats (Labour was not worried that the Liberal Democrats may gain seats, as they were the third party and were not a threat). This may, then, account for the 100% (20 to 46) increase in Liberal Democrat seats while their % share of the vote went down 1%! The work of the Labour Party members also paid dividends. The increasing number of young members working all over the country opposed to the reduced ageing membership of the Conservatives meant Labour could campaign all over the country while the Conservatives were stretched. Finally, Labour had the media on its side, a priceless tool. While Labour could do very little wrong, The Conservatives were constantly on the front page for scandals involving Neil Hamilton and Michael Portillo. Essentially, the Labour Party capitalised on their % share of the vote. Though their huge majority in the House of Commons is due to a variety of reasons: The problems faced by the Conservatives, the reforming and repositioning of labour, electoral geography, Labour's campaign tactics, tactical voting and Labour's party membership. ...read more.


This included asylum seekers and the Euro, which were not generally important to the electorate. Whereas Labour and the Liberal Democrats concentrated on more important issues such as NHS and education. There was less than a 2% swing from Labour to Conservatives, and overall there was little change from 1997. The huge apathy in 2001, shows a trend that in 1997 it was an Anti-Tory election, and in 2001 it was Anti-any party election. This may have been mainly due to party de-alignment where they basically all have the same policies (Labour are said to be as right as the Tories). This election has shown the parties that less people are interested, and so political participation has been high on the agenda. All parties have also tried to distinguish themselves, and make promises that will actually change people's lives (they say) for the better. It has ended with more conflict in the House of Commons, and promise of reform in the future (Euro still at Tony Blair's discrepancy). Desperate to set his party apart, it could be possible that the PM thinks a victory in Iraq will improve his standings and cause less apathy with more support for his party. Chris Williams Pol 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Just by losing a core of middle class voters, Labour lost a great many marginal contests and most particularly in the well-to-do constituencies of southern and south-eastern England. Following Cripps' resignation on grounds of ill health, Hugh Gaitskell took over as Chancellor during Attlee's second government.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Chart 1: Electoral Systems in Comparison: Common Advantages of Each System Plurality-Majoritarian (PM) Proportional Representation (PR) Semi-Proportional A simple method that also links representatives with particular geographic areas. Reduces the disparity between a party's share of the national vote and number of seats in parliament.

  1. Asylum seekers

    To try and improve the situation for the asylum seekers, the government has made many attempts to propose better facilities in a special centres for them. This would give them a comfortable safe place to stay whilst their applications were processed.

  2. The 1906 General Election saw a convincing Liberal landslide of 399 Liberal seats to ...

    War and yet ignore the poor in England had fallen on deaf ears at the time he made the comment. However, the rejection rates, the social surveys and the literature of the time (Horrible London, In Darkest England) saw the Tory opponents adopt this line of criticism.

  1. A critical analysis of selected election literature and party political broadcasts from the general ...

    I think that the aim of the leaflet is to mock the other parties and obtain votes. It does this quite successfully, but at the end of the day, your only going to vote for a party if you believe in the morals.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    Discreet, civilised and knowledgeable in the ways of the Treasury and very Oxbridge, he was very much the mandarin's mandarin. He had been immensely sceptical of George Brown's Department of Economic Affairs and National Plan and was probably as sceptical of Tory radicalism.

  1. Why did Labour win the 2001 election?

    The fact that the conservatives had a bad reputation was more important to the Labour party winning the election than the fact William Hague was a bad leader. If the conservatives had been a good party previously, they would never have been voted out and hence their mistakes had led to them not being re-elected in 2001.

  2. "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

    yet they lost to Conservatives 40% of the vote. Labour got 277 seats where as Conservatives got 345 seats. Lord Jenkins points out that FPP has marginalised the Liberal Democrats. FPP produces stable majority governments, exception of February '74 when Labour formed a minority government known as a 'hung parliament.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work