• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened in the 1997 General Election and why? What impact did it have?

Extracts from this document...


What happened in the 1997 General Election and why? What impact did it have? In 1997 there was an expected swing from Conservative to Labour government. It resulted in Labour receiving 9.2% more votes, and 147 more MPs than in 1992; and with the Conservatives winning 11% less votes, and 171 less MPs than in 1992 (the Liberal Democrats won 17% of the votes about equalling the previous election, and gained 26 seats). The outcome of the election was due to various factors which had always been apparent yet commentators never predicted the severity of Labour's win and the Conservative's loss. Blatantly, the first reason for this landslide victory was the weakness of the Conservatives. Broadly put, the reasons the electorate DID NOT vote for the Conservative party were that they seemed, old, tired, divided and sleazy. This can be seen in that the average age of a Conservative MP was over 50 and 44% of over 65s voted for them, their campaigning was limited, there was internal conflict over many issues such as the Economy and Europe. ...read more.


This means that it stops the Conservatives getting seats (Labour was not worried that the Liberal Democrats may gain seats, as they were the third party and were not a threat). This may, then, account for the 100% (20 to 46) increase in Liberal Democrat seats while their % share of the vote went down 1%! The work of the Labour Party members also paid dividends. The increasing number of young members working all over the country opposed to the reduced ageing membership of the Conservatives meant Labour could campaign all over the country while the Conservatives were stretched. Finally, Labour had the media on its side, a priceless tool. While Labour could do very little wrong, The Conservatives were constantly on the front page for scandals involving Neil Hamilton and Michael Portillo. Essentially, the Labour Party capitalised on their % share of the vote. Though their huge majority in the House of Commons is due to a variety of reasons: The problems faced by the Conservatives, the reforming and repositioning of labour, electoral geography, Labour's campaign tactics, tactical voting and Labour's party membership. ...read more.


This included asylum seekers and the Euro, which were not generally important to the electorate. Whereas Labour and the Liberal Democrats concentrated on more important issues such as NHS and education. There was less than a 2% swing from Labour to Conservatives, and overall there was little change from 1997. The huge apathy in 2001, shows a trend that in 1997 it was an Anti-Tory election, and in 2001 it was Anti-any party election. This may have been mainly due to party de-alignment where they basically all have the same policies (Labour are said to be as right as the Tories). This election has shown the parties that less people are interested, and so political participation has been high on the agenda. All parties have also tried to distinguish themselves, and make promises that will actually change people's lives (they say) for the better. It has ended with more conflict in the House of Commons, and promise of reform in the future (Euro still at Tony Blair's discrepancy). Desperate to set his party apart, it could be possible that the PM thinks a victory in Iraq will improve his standings and cause less apathy with more support for his party. Chris Williams Pol 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Asylum seekers

    With 1.7 asylum seekers per 1,000 national population. The majority of asylum seekers flee to neighbouring countries. Iran hosts 1.9 million refugees and Pakistan hosts 2 million. In 2001 Britain received 72,000 asylum applications, and accepted around 50%. Earlier this year the Government presented to Parliament a White Paper, with

  2. Liberal Democrats on iraq

    � Nuclear proliferation Although Saddam had no WMD programme, since the war ended nuclear equipment has vanished in Iraq and the IAEA have warned it could lead to nuclear proliferation. Holding the Government to account In addition to voting against the decision to invade Iraq when the matter was put

  1. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    Along with this problem was the fact that the Conservative party had to now battle against a new and improved Labour government which had changed its ideology, and which was rapidly becoming the peoples party. John Major now had the problem of having to do battle with Tony Blair who

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    However, while some people (and Blair himself) call Blair a modernised socialist, what therefore should reflect the position of the New Labour, others argue that Blair with his beliefs shifted the New Labour towards Liberals' direction and the rest argue about the Tory Blair and the movement towards Conservatives on the ideological spectrum.

  1. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    Labour could now be a party for a younger Britain, it made significant long-lasting alterations in what the party represented. Blair's own intentions were to portray honesty and integrity, he wanted people to see Labour as the only natural party to govern Britain, this was not be achievable if Clause IV was to be upheld.

  2. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    proportion of tax revenue thence to be paid against sickness, elderliness and unemployment to name but three key entitlements. As a response to the housing problem, Dalton committed to building one million new homes, 80% of which were council houses to be rented cheaply to those who most needed them.

  1. The 1906 General Election saw a convincing Liberal landslide of 399 Liberal seats to ...

    Soon after the landslide victory of 1900, however, circumstances changed, and much of the Tory success was unravelled, and revealed to be little more than a thin veneer over a weak structure. Failure to conquer the Boer fighters who had resorted to guerrilla warfare raised questions of military competence on the part of the British army.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    His enthusiasm for reform won him enemies in Whitehall and when he was dismissed in 1992 by William Waldegrave, amid stories of a clash of personality, he did not receive great support from his civil service colleagues. In 1992 it was announced that the work of agencies would be reviewed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work