• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What happened in the 1997 General Election and why? What impact did it have?

Extracts from this document...


What happened in the 1997 General Election and why? What impact did it have? In 1997 there was an expected swing from Conservative to Labour government. It resulted in Labour receiving 9.2% more votes, and 147 more MPs than in 1992; and with the Conservatives winning 11% less votes, and 171 less MPs than in 1992 (the Liberal Democrats won 17% of the votes about equalling the previous election, and gained 26 seats). The outcome of the election was due to various factors which had always been apparent yet commentators never predicted the severity of Labour's win and the Conservative's loss. Blatantly, the first reason for this landslide victory was the weakness of the Conservatives. Broadly put, the reasons the electorate DID NOT vote for the Conservative party were that they seemed, old, tired, divided and sleazy. This can be seen in that the average age of a Conservative MP was over 50 and 44% of over 65s voted for them, their campaigning was limited, there was internal conflict over many issues such as the Economy and Europe. ...read more.


This means that it stops the Conservatives getting seats (Labour was not worried that the Liberal Democrats may gain seats, as they were the third party and were not a threat). This may, then, account for the 100% (20 to 46) increase in Liberal Democrat seats while their % share of the vote went down 1%! The work of the Labour Party members also paid dividends. The increasing number of young members working all over the country opposed to the reduced ageing membership of the Conservatives meant Labour could campaign all over the country while the Conservatives were stretched. Finally, Labour had the media on its side, a priceless tool. While Labour could do very little wrong, The Conservatives were constantly on the front page for scandals involving Neil Hamilton and Michael Portillo. Essentially, the Labour Party capitalised on their % share of the vote. Though their huge majority in the House of Commons is due to a variety of reasons: The problems faced by the Conservatives, the reforming and repositioning of labour, electoral geography, Labour's campaign tactics, tactical voting and Labour's party membership. ...read more.


This included asylum seekers and the Euro, which were not generally important to the electorate. Whereas Labour and the Liberal Democrats concentrated on more important issues such as NHS and education. There was less than a 2% swing from Labour to Conservatives, and overall there was little change from 1997. The huge apathy in 2001, shows a trend that in 1997 it was an Anti-Tory election, and in 2001 it was Anti-any party election. This may have been mainly due to party de-alignment where they basically all have the same policies (Labour are said to be as right as the Tories). This election has shown the parties that less people are interested, and so political participation has been high on the agenda. All parties have also tried to distinguish themselves, and make promises that will actually change people's lives (they say) for the better. It has ended with more conflict in the House of Commons, and promise of reform in the future (Euro still at Tony Blair's discrepancy). Desperate to set his party apart, it could be possible that the PM thinks a victory in Iraq will improve his standings and cause less apathy with more support for his party. Chris Williams Pol 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Gaitskell adopted a similarly pragmatic approach to Britain's budgetary problems and kept typically socialist long-term economic planning to a minimum. Although there was some tangible degree of divisions within the party over the banality and unradical approach, with many backbenchers urging a return to the early zealousness for national change, it was not this issue which harmed the party most.

  2. Asylum seekers

    They had a strong belief that the asylum seekers would ruin their lives because they would be causing crime and were all terrorists!! They were also scared for their own safety and that of their families' safety. They were worried that they would be mugged or attacked.

  1. "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

    stack up 1000's of wasted votes. In may 1979 the Liberal Democrats needed an average of 391,393 votes to elect one candidate whereas the Conservatives only needed an average of 40,406 votes to elect one candidate. Thatcher was only voted for by 3 out of 10 people yet she had a majority of 143.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    (Source: www.parliament.co.uk, May 4, 2004) Moreover, as Tony Blair said, government spent �46 million in the North East getting the employed back to work. While the North East has 4.2% of the country's population, it has so far received 6.6% of New Deal funding, reflecting the region's special needs.

  1. The 1906 General Election saw a convincing Liberal landslide of 399 Liberal seats to ...

    Clearly the British government would have been aware of this. That they created the Bluewater Rule in 1889, by which the British government made it law that the British navy should be the same size as the next two

  2. Liberal Democrats on iraq

    There is severe and deadly rivalry for control of the state, and the violence is unabated. � Terrorism The conflict has not only placed severe strain on international relations between the Muslim world and the West, but Iraq is now a crucible of militant terrorism.

  1. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    issues concerning Europe with the left wing Conservatives wanting more involvement and integration with the European Union. This can be seen as one of the major contributors to the decline in the party, "Conservatives were now seen as "being out of touch with modern Britain" and "going on too much

  2. Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

    The changes obviously ran much deeper than just a catchy update to the party name, firstly the party made an ideological shift from the left of the political spectrum more towards the centre. Labour went from being an out and out Socialist party to having no real ideology (The Third Way).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work