• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What, if anything, is socialist about the Labour party?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What, if anything, is socialist about the Labour party? Richard Wood Socialism is defined in the oxford English as a "political and economic theory of social organisation that advocates that community as a whole should own and control the means of production, distribution, and exchange." Philosophically this fitted the labour party and it's roots. When the labour party was founded in 1900 four constituent elements were instrumental in its make-up. Theses four elements were: the trade unions, the social democrat federation, the Fabians and the Independent labour party. They all needed socialism although only the Social Democrat Federation had a strong ideology. These groups produced a version of moderate evolutionary socialism with an idea of a fairer more just society. They claimed human nature was collectivist not individualist and could reach perfection. To reach this state intervention was needed to run industry- for the collective good. Labour, like all political parties, has changed and evolved over the years, it has most definitely moved away from it's roots and is by no means as socialist as it was. But is it still socialist at all? In order to find this out I will explore the context of old labour and socialism, the ideological debate, organisation and structural changes, changes in policy and policy-making, and Blair's 'New Labour' government. ...read more.

Middle

The modernisers have traditionally centred on the Parliamentary Labour party whilst the traditionalists have their strength in the extra-parliamentary elements- constituencies and other organisations (e.g. trade unions). The parliamentary wing of the party has always sought to be the alternative party to government and so has closely followed the wishes of the electorate and adapted policies. The modernisers have always seen clause IV and nationalisation as an electoral liability. The traditionalists did not want to loose sight of their roots however, nationalisation and public ownership were crucial ways to redress the class balance. During the Thatcher years socialists such as 'red' Ken Livingstone argued that labour should work locally to convince voters that socialism could work (e.g. Liverpool council). This proved an embarrassment to Labour leadership and the Conservatives. Power in the Labour party is divided between the Leader, the annual conference, constituencies and trade unions; therefore it is a federalist party. This reflects the debate as how much the extra-parliamentary wing should control the parliamentary wing has always been an important question in the Labour party. Much of the power in the Labour party was beyond the control of the part leadership because of this system and it is one of the reasons Tony Blair et al reformed the structure of the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the reasons that the Conservatives are seen as such a weak opposition is because they agree with Labour on many things (e.g. war on Iraq). Tony Blair has changed the mechanism of leadership elections, altered the bloc vote and clause IV, introduced OMOV (one member one vote), consulted members through policy forums, and reduced dependency on trade union finance. This marks a move away from socialism and into 'democratisation' of the labour party. The party under Blair now has an acceptance of a so-called 'neo-liberal agenda'. This is shown most obviously in Blair's 'Third Way' policy, it is as Macmurray states communitarianism or ethical socialism. New labour emphasise community involvement instead of equality, a society midway between state provision and the free market. Left Conservatives favour these ideas just as much as they are by the right of the labour party. In today's labour party it is difficult to see exactly where the socialist policies lay but there are some there. The Third Way may not be traditionally socialist but there are socialist components, e.g. redistribution of wealth. At the same time there is absolutely no doubt that the labour party has moved to the right significantly Aneurin Bevan or Harold Laskii would hardly recognise the party, and traditional labour MP's such as Tony Benn often speak out against their own party. Glimmers of socialism can be seen in the labour party but the main agenda is most definitely neo-liberal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How and why did Federation occur?

    By 1909 half the reserves had been taken from the Aboriginals and given to pastoralists * Aboriginals were forced to move off the land and into the towns to become dependent on Europeans. * In Victoria and Queensland also set up reserves but could decide where Aboriginals could live.

  2. "The Rise of the Labour Party between 1893-1914 was due more to the growth ...

    The Liberal Government made little effort to reverse the ruling and simply set up a Royal Commission. This event clearly angered trade unions throughout the country and forced them to back the LRC rather than the seemingly uninterested Liberals. The result of the case led to an increase in the

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    * It breaks the link between an individual MP and his or her constituency. * Constituencies would be 3-5 times larger than they are now but with 3-5 MPs. * MPs may have to spend an excessive amount of time dealing with constituency problems and neglect the broader issues.

  2. Why the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party

    Lloyd George Governments have failed - then let Labour try its hand." As the initial wartime hysteria gave way to horror as the casualties mounted up on the western front, anti-war protesters like Ramsay MacDonald, leader of the Labour Party, gained a new credibility.

  1. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    and so once again Labour was short of money, and the pound had fallen into the Dollar gap. This poor management of the economy led Labour to fall out of the public graces, this period had seen little involvement from the TUs and Labour had still managed to find its

  2. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    Some historians have argued that the cabinet of the first Labour government was chosen poorly, with many of the ministers knowing little or nothing about their departments. For example, J.H Thomas, the former railwaymen's leader, became Colonial Secretary despite knowing very little about the Empire.

  1. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    According to this, Consensus Conservatism accepted mixed economy. Moreover, only two industries (iron and steel and road haulage) were privatised in 1953. Also, when Heath's government elected in June 1970, which wanted to promote "the free market and self-reliance in place of welfarism", faced with rising unemployment from a quarter

  2. Why were the 1930's a decade of disappointment for the labour party?

    These events cost labour electorate support. With such fears already embedded in the 1920's, one thing Labour did not want to do in the 1930's was create any situation that would be reminiscent of these links with Communism. Unfortunately the activities of Sir Stafford Crips, a prominent figure among the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work